3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Main Menu

Heavy broadhead question

Started by SweatyTeddy, September 26, 2025, 01:39:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

wcdurand, Bluefeather, Orion, kennym, MKane, ranger1, Tim Reese, EHK, Mike Bolin, ohiodoeslayer and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

SweatyTeddy

Hey everyone!
Are any of you folks running a heavier broadhead (190-200gr.) on a standard insert? I'm new to building arrows and I see everyone running collars or heavy brass inserts. Is it uncommon to shoot a 190 grain head with a regular insert? Have I been just been duped by big FOC?
Edit: currently shooting carbons and aluminums

Mike Bolin

I let tuning/arrow flight dictate my point/broadhead weight. When I first started dropping in bow weight I had a bunch of 400 spine shafts. I played around with the point weight until they flew well. A few years later I dropped in bow weight again and changed over to a 500 spine, again playing with the point weight until I got good flight. I've never concerned myself much with FOC, more interested in total arrow weight and the best arrow flight I can get. It does seem that I usually end up with a fairly high FOC and an arrow that finishes out at 11.5-12.5 grains per pound of bow weight. It varies as to whether I achieve the necessary weight with heavier point, weighted inserts or adapters. I've used about everything that's available and it all worked. If I were hunting game bigger that a whitetail, I "might" shy away from the aluminum broadhead adapters.>>>----->
Centaur longbow 62", 43#@28"
Osage Selfbow 62", 47#@28
Compton Traditional Bowhunters

Mint

I shoot heritage 150's with 200gr broadhead with standard insert or 160 gr broadhead with 50 gr brass insert and they both fly the same and have had no issues with either set up.
The Constitution shall never be construed... to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.

Samuel Adams

NYB Life Member
NRA Life Member

EHK

As other have said, there's nothing wrong with heavier heads and stock inserts.  I think some guys (I'm one of them) prefer the idea of a smaller broadhead up front so there's less to "steer" the arrow or less for the fletching to have to overcome.  I'll take a 50 grain insert and 150 grain Magnus Stinger over a bigger 200 grain head every day.  I also only hunt whitetails and use light bows in the low 40s for what it's worth. 

Orion

I shoot about 250 grains up front on my carbon arrows, mostly with a 100 grain insert and 150 grain point/adaptor. Would have no compunction with shooting a heavier head and lighter insert. An aluminum insert isn't as strong as a heavier steel insert, but plenty strong for deer size critters. 

SweatyTeddy

Quote from: EHK on September 26, 2025, 04:05:01 PMAs other have said, there's nothing wrong with heavier heads and stock inserts.  I think some guys (I'm one of them) prefer the idea of a smaller broadhead up front so there's less to "steer" the arrow or less for the fletching to have to overcome.  I'll take a 50 grain insert and 150 grain Magnus Stinger over a bigger 200 grain head every day.  I also only hunt whitetails and use light bows in the low 40s for what it's worth.

This makes a lot of sense! Thanks


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©