3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Main Menu

Stu calculator and I

Started by PERUN, June 29, 2013, 04:32:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PERUN

Maybe I have a problem and maybe not. That's why I ask you to write your opinions.
Stu calculator and I do not agree


take a look at
   


I am satisfied with the flight arrow

picture from this morning with 27 meters
   

I would be happy to hear what you think
Perun hybrid 62" 60#@29"

Pete McMiller

I NEVER match stu's calculator unless I put in a personal form factor of around -10.  I just tuned some new arrows - bare shafted perfectly and the only way it works on his calculator is with a form factor of -10.  I have great arrow flight even with bare shafts out to 30 yds.  Use Stu's calculator to get close and then fine tune yourself.
Pete
WTA
CTAS
PBS

Charter member - Ye Old F.A.R.T.S and Elkaholics Anonymous

MOLON LABE  [mo 'lon  la 've]

"That human optimism & goodness that we put our faith in, is in no more danger than the stars in the jaws of the clouds." ............Victor Hugo

Caughtandhobble

I use Stu's for a new bow and arrow setup always. I have found that Stu's always puts me in the ball park. Stu's along with bare shaft tuning has worked very well for me.

threeunder

Stu's is pretty accurate for me.  I also find, though, that either carbons have a "sweet spot" that shows up about 8-10 lbs underspined or they are WAY more tolerant of being underspined than Stu gives them credit for.
I can't prove it, but i've seen it happen enough to believe in it.
In the end, though, go with what works for you.
Ken Adkins

Never question a man's choice in bows or the quality of an animal he kills.  He is the only one who has to be satisfied with either of those choices.

TxAg

QuoteOriginally posted by threeunder:
Stu's is pretty accurate for me.  I also find, though, that either carbons have a "sweet spot" that shows up about 8-10 lbs underspined or they are WAY more tolerant of being underspined than Stu gives them credit for.
I can't prove it, but i've seen it happen enough to believe in it.
In the end, though, go with what works for you.
x2. I love Stu's calculator. It is a great tool. My carbons consistently show 10# weak, but no biggie....i just work with it and tinker in the yard to get things perfect

PERUN

in any case i am satisfied with this setup .I think is FOC good and no worries about penetration , so .....
thanks guys
Perun hybrid 62" 60#@29"

QuoteOriginally posted by Pete McMiller:
I NEVER match stu's calculator unless I put in a personal form factor of around -10.  I just tuned some new arrows - bare shafted perfectly and the only way it works on his calculator is with a form factor of -10.  I have great arrow flight even with bare shafts out to 30 yds.  Use Stu's calculator to get close and then fine tune yourself.
I have to go to -15 on the PFF. If I leave that -15 in there all the time, then when I use the calculator for a new bow, it usually comes out real close. Never exact, but usually very close, with only minor tweaking needed.

Bisch

damascusdave

Just because you are getting good arrow flight at 27 metres does not mean you are getting good flight at 7 metres or less...that is the real test
I set out a while ago to reduce my herd of 40 bows...And I am finally down to 42

twitchstick

It's almost always dead on for me.

PERUN

bareshaft test 5m and 10m is same , this photo is taken after 10 m shooting


Perun hybrid 62" 60#@29"


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©