Tiger sharks due to the lighter poundage I shoot.

Just started shooting Simmons last season and used the non vented Interceptors and Tigersharks killed deer with both and both preformed perfect. Upped my bow poundage a little this yr and am shooting the Tree Sharks. Killed a buck with those and my broadhead switching days are over.

Tree Sharks for me.  Anytime I can get a broadhead that big, to fly that good I'll take it.

QuoteOriginally posted by joekeith:
Tree Sharks for me.  Anytime I can get a broadhead that big, to fly that good I'll take it.

X2 for my carbons.  Like the 135 gr. Tiger Shark for my woods.

I actually prefer the per simmons.

Per simmons are good but i like the glue on solid interceptors.
Perfect weight , quiet and hold a good edge.

I like the big tree sharks. When I first got them I kinda laughed thinking there was no way they would fly good. Wrong. I have only tested them on a turkey so far so I don't have a lot of real world experience with them yet.

I haven't used them hunting yet but after seeing the pics on the post on broadhead wounds I ordered some Tree Sharks.  I was also skeptical about the flight characteristics but had heard good things so I figured I'd give them a try.  I have only shot them on a few occasions since I live in the nw rainforrest but they do fly excellent as long as the bow is tuned properly.  When I shot them out of my 66# Stealth they flew like darts but my Brack which I just started to tune when the weather turned didn't do so well. They will definitely magnify any problems with the tuning of your bow.

For the Turks TREESHARK all the way.

Treesharks.

Inceptors ion the front of some straight River Cane!

Do the vents on the blades of the tigersharks create problems?Would solid blades be better?

Some people say they do,but any time mine have whistled it has been a bad release on my part any other time they are very quiet.

Right now I'm shooting 190gr interceptors but I'm leaning on trying the tree sharks next.

I have only used the land shark because they work so good I hate to switch . They cut about a 1 1/2 inch hole on the entrance , and  two and a half inch hole on the way out. None of the five big game animals that I have shot with the LandShark have made it to the 50 yard line.Three of the five I have watched fall after traveling less than 30 yards.I have also shot the longer Simmions and it fly"s just like a field point.

Safari glue on for me.

I'm not sure?  I've had great success with the interceptor, original interceptor,   safari  head, tree shark, and tiger shark not sure which I prefer best yet.   Guess I will try the land shark this year and make my final pick. Lol.  All good heads -i often times have 2 or 3 different models in my quiver and einie menie minei  mo it.

A Tree Shark worked perfectly yesterday, on this dirty pig in S. Texas!

I'm liking the Safari model. I've taken 2 deer this year with it and have been impressed.  I haven't tried other models and really don't see the need. Good penetration and short highly visible bloodtrails. And man that BH slices them open!

I have a Newfoundland moose hunt booked for the 2014 rut.  Has anyone experience shooting them at larger critters? I'm shooting 55#.

hello the gang wich one i can use to get a 150 / 170 final weight ?