3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Author Topic: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?  (Read 2513 times)

Offline Earl Jeff

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 858
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #20 on: December 05, 2009, 04:10:00 PM »
longer is smoooooooooooooooooother

Offline BRITTMAN

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1307
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2009, 06:17:00 PM »
Ive thought alot about the shorter vs longer myself . Best thing for you to do is to try diffrent bows at diffrent lengths and see what fits you the best for all types of hunting situations . For me I think its the shorter bow and 58 inches seems to be about right .
" Live long and prosper "

Online Mike Bolin

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1919
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2009, 09:19:00 PM »
I have tried out several different recurves 60" and under over the past several years and there are some definite differences between manufacturers. There is a BIG difference on some of them. Whisperstick bows in the 58" length is very smooth and shootable for me at 28" and I am sure it would be at 29"+. I have a Timberhawk t/d recurve that is 58" and it feels/seems as smooth to me as the 64" longbow I just sold. I agree with some of the other folks that you will probably lose and inch or more in draw length from your wheel bow. I went from 30" with wheels down to 28" with traditional bows. Good luck-Mike
Bodnik Quick Stick 60", 40#@28"
Osage Selfbow 62", 47#@28
Compton Traditional Bowhunters

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2009, 09:27:00 PM »
As far as people not having any problem hunting with longer bows out of tree stands, I think most of you are hunting from trees with few or no limbs on them. Some of the trees I hunt out of have several limbs on them around where I am standing. I had to actually leave my stand once after climbing into it and discovering I could hardly draw my 64" Montana LB back because of the limbs in the way. I don't have that bow anymore 'cause now I hunt with my 56" Beeler LB. It's perfect for what I want to do with it and shoots great too.
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Offline Ringneck

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 978
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2009, 11:34:00 PM »
I tried a Kodiak Magnum and hated it. For my money recurves start at 58" and I prefer 60-62. I don't want to go any shorter than 58".

Offline Dave Bulla

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1798
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #25 on: December 06, 2009, 12:13:00 PM »
Well yea, ya gotta pick a huntable tree....   :D  

I certainly like background cover in a tree and a couple branches directly behind me is a big plus but sheesh, ya need to use a little common sense.  It'd be like hunting from the ground and finding a big old deadfall with lots of branches on it where you could crawl back inside and hide real good.  But if you can't move to draw your bow, what good does it do.  Gotta break out the saw and make it usable.
Dave


I've come to believe that the keys to shooting well for me are good form, trusting the bow to do all the work, and having the confidence in the bow and myself to remain motionless and relaxed at release until the arrow hits the mark.

Offline **DONOTDELETE**

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 10441
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #26 on: December 06, 2009, 12:41:00 PM »
Now I owned a 54" Shrew ( Before passing it on ) and I have a 70" (72" T2T) long bow. There is a big difference in these bow, but I have taken deer out of a tree with both.

 As others have said, short bows can pinch if your draw is long and that they will show bad form better then a longer bow. I feel it comes down to which one you like better. Which one do You shoot better? That is more imported then anything else.

Offline Lost Arra

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1110
Re: shorter vs longer overall length advantages?
« Reply #27 on: December 06, 2009, 09:32:00 PM »
On a whim I made a jump from my usual 62-64" bow to a 54" Shrew.

My only problem with the shorty is using a bow quiver. My 30" arrows extend farther than the limb tip which makes resting the lower limb tip on my boot a problem. I like keeping my bow in an upright position during times I am sitting. This is not an insurmountable problem, but the fletching or nocks are in the way on the short bow.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©