3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Main Menu

1 pc bow VS TD bow

Started by huntnut, January 20, 2009, 08:32:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

huntnut

Which do you guys perfer? 1pc. or 3pc take down recurve or longbow.

pros and cons
Bear Grizzly 50#@28

wingnut

If given a choice I'd go for the 3 pc.  It has more mass in the handle and is better on target.  Also it travels well to alaska or around the world.

Check ours out.

Mike
Mike Westvang

Shawn Leonard

I agree with Mike, but I still prefer a one-piece. I just like the looks and feel  a whole lot better. I seem to shoot my one-piece bows better as well. Shawn
Shawn

wingnut

Shawn,

You don't have one of our 3 pc bows.

LOL

Mike
Mike Westvang

Ian johnson

I cant wait to try one of mikes 3piece bows, I have tried both and I like the three piece best
ARTAC member
53@29 sheepeater shaman recurve
52@29 66 bear grizzly
51@29 dryad orion td longbow

owlbait

I sure like my Zipper T/d's! Beautiful bows that fit and shoot great!
Advice from The Buck:"Only little girls shoot spikers!"

Dartwick

Generically recurves can be shorter if all else is equal and long bows are quieter.
3 piece bows are heavier and 1 bows piece are lighter.
Wherever you went - here you are.

Bowtie

I prefer 3-pc. (recurve & longbow) because of more mass weight. But, I do have a Leon Stewart 1-pc., 66" that I wouldn't part with.... great shooter with ample mass weight for me.
The work praises the man.

longbowben

I love the lines of a one piece,and the light mass weight.
54" Hoots 57@28
60" MOAB 60@28
Gold tip, 160gr Snuffer
TGMM Family of the Bow
USAF 90-96 69TH Bomb Squadron

DannyBows

I've been shooting both, but today I shot a new-to-me 3 pc. Pronghorn for the first time and it's the bow I've been looking for. I'll be selling most or all of my one-piece bows and getting an extra set of limbs for the Pronghorn. I'm keeping my 2 pc. McCullough as my back-up. They'll travel easy too.
"Always feel the wind, and walk just like the leaves".  ("LongBow Country"--Chad Slagle, "High, Wild, and Free").

snag

I think it's good to have both! lol If you are going to travel or want to get different weight limbs you can with the TD. Then if you are hunting around your home area you've got the one piece.
Isaiah 49:2...he made me a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver.

joe skipp

For travelling on my hunts, I prefer the 3 pc T/D. For whitetails here in NJ, NY and CT...I love the one piece recurve and longbow.
"Neal...is this heaven?" "No Piute but we are dam close". Top of the Mtn in Medicine Bow Nat Forest.

Apex Predator

Personally, I don't care for a heavy bow.  That leaves me mostly with one piece longbows.  I do like 50s style recurves, and the two piece takedown longbows.
I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat vegetables!

Curveman

I like two piece longbows and recurves with the limbs recessed into the riser (Borders, Widows, Habus, etc.). Just because of the lines/seamless look. If I didn't travel for hunting I might just go all one piece.
Compliance Officer MK,LLC
NRA Life Member

Irish Archer

One-piece longbow or recurve gets my vote. I've always been a one-piece fan. Just don't like the looks of limbs bolted to risers. However, a PL Widow, now I like that. Just don't have one.

NDTerminator

Have several of both and each has their strong points.  I guess if you pinned me down I like TDs a bit better due to their versatility.

One piece are almost always lighter & more "alive" in my hand, and to me have better lines & are more pleasing to the eye.

TD's  are handier and far more versatile.  They are easy to travel with, nice & steady due to the extra weight, the bow isn't finished if you break a limb, and limbs of varying draw weights can be used on the same riser...
"As Trad as I wanna be"

"It's all just archery, and all archery is good"

cacciatore

If you have to travel ovrsea, like I do, you only want TD, plus the versability of changing weight. If you brake something is just half the total cost
1993 PBS Regular
Compton
CBA
CSTAS

ishoot4thrills

QuoteOriginally posted by NDTerminator:
Have several of both and each has their strong points.  I guess if you pinned me down I like TDs a bit better due to their versatility.

One piece are almost always lighter & more "alive" in my hand, and to me have better lines & are more pleasing to the eye.

TD's  are handier and far more versatile.  They are easy to travel with, nice & steady due to the extra weight, the bow isn't finished if you break a limb, and limbs of varying draw weights can be used on the same riser...
Couldn't have said it any better than that. My feelings EXACTLY.    :clapper:
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

James Wrenn

I like one piece bows best but TDs are so practical many times.I try and use two piece bows in longbows for a compramise.Still looks and handles like a one piece but with just a little more weight in the hand depending on the TD joint.For recurves which I don't hunt with as much I just use a 3 piece bow.
....Quality deer management means shooting them before they get tough....

pseman

Longbows, I like one piece. Recurves, I prefer takedowns. I can shoot either if the grip fits me, neither if it doesn't.

What I need(errr want), is a takedown riser with a perfect grip that will take either recurve limbs or longbow limbs.
Mark Thornton

It doesn't matter how or what you shoot, as long as you hit your target.


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©