3Rivers Archery


The Trad Gang Digital Market












Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Alum. Arrow to replace a 600 carbon for spine

Started by SS Snuffer, December 12, 2024, 03:57:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SS Snuffer

Chuck
Kodiak Mag 52" 41 lb.
Kota Kill-Um 60" 42 lb.
Kanati 58" 38 lb.
Black Hunter Longbow 60" 40 lb.

No Guts - No Story

3dmuzzy

Put some air under it.

McDave

Depending on length and point weight either an 1816 or 1916 should work.  I shoot either .600 GT Ultralight carbons or .600 Victory Vap's in several bows.  I like to enter a trad tournament every year that requires either aluminum or wood arrows.  1816's cut to 27 3/4" with 90 grain points makes a good substitute for either carbon arrow I mentioned.  The 1816's are still heavier than the carbons, but are the lightest aluminum arrows I can find that work.  However, for a longer arrow or a heavier point, I would use 1916's.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Not all those who wander are lost, some are just looking for lost arrows.  Tolkien (in part)

Kelly

The 600 carbons I've tested are 53# spine. A 1916 is 53# spine on the same spine tester. So is a 2013 which is also lighter in grain weight.
>>>>============>

Enjoy the flight of an arrow amongst Mother Nature's Glory!

Once one opens the mind to the plausible, the unbelievable becomes possible!

>>>>============>

Yours for better bowhunting, Kelly

SS Snuffer

Chuck
Kodiak Mag 52" 41 lb.
Kota Kill-Um 60" 42 lb.
Kanati 58" 38 lb.
Black Hunter Longbow 60" 40 lb.

No Guts - No Story

Tajue17

just my opinion because I shoot 600's and aluminum's and depending on the bow I use 1916, 2016 with heavier point , 2114 for a faster flatter flying arrow...
"Us vs Them"


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©