Do you need more then #50?

Biathlonman · July 12, 2015, 11:44:00 AM

So I was thinking that I needed to start trying to work my way up a bow that's about 55@28. The more I hunt and the more I shoot I'm starting to think my fast modern 50@28, drawn 29", with skinny string would probably be just find for the bigger game. What says the experienced bunch? Just food for thought, new bow is shooting a 650 grain arrow mid-170s.

Doug_K · July 12, 2015, 11:47:00 AM

Nope.. Your arrow/broad head and shot placement matter a hell of alot more than the # of your bow.

kennym · July 12, 2015, 12:21:00 PM

^
Yep!

Pine · July 12, 2015, 12:22:00 PM

You know , I am convinced that it is more of a macho thing . When I was in my 20s I had to shoot 80# bows because most people couldn't do it .
Funny thing , the state record for the largest white tail doe in Michigan set back in the early 1960s was done by a woman with a 25# recurve .

Robert Armstrong · July 12, 2015, 12:55:00 PM

I've taken several deer with a 50# bow and 190 grain shark. Blew completly through. Complete pass through on most of them. If you want to go heavier have at it. I shoot 61 right now, just because I want to. If you do and go back to 50 you may find an increase in accuracy. If you don't try something new your not learning any thing new. EXPERINCE counts for a lot. Don't pass up a chance to grow. We all want another bow, even when the one we have works just fine. LOL.

mark Willoughby · July 12, 2015, 01:31:00 PM

Isn't that the truth Robert ! Well said

but for me I'm sticking around the 40 pound mark

trad_bowhunter1965 · July 12, 2015, 01:47:00 PM

It just boils down to shot placement and a very sharp broadhead.

Recurve7 · July 12, 2015, 01:54:00 PM

50# is most adequate! And, most likely more accurate as mentioned above. It' will be more fun to shoot also. The more you shoot the more accurate you become. It's just better!

pdk25 · July 12, 2015, 02:13:00 PM

5# difference will make very little difference in any case. Being able to shoot 55# or more will just make it that much more easy to control your 50# bow. I won't back down in poundage until I have to, but what is right for me isn't right for everyone. To answer your question, If you are actually shooting a 650 grain arrow in the mid 170's, I think you should be able to kill even the largest of hogs with proper shot placement.

Sirius Black · July 12, 2015, 02:27:00 PM

Read Don Thomas' article in the last Traditional Bowhunter issue. It's about shoulder injuries, which I've had myself. I have a 60# longbow, and a 52# (that I'm currently shooting), and I don't think I will go back to the heavier one. I want to enjoy archery for many more years to come.

K.S.TRAPPER · July 12, 2015, 03:22:00 PM

I'm with Kenny x2, #50 is a great poundage for most big game.

Nice to see a thread for once on here were someone is trying to improve there poundage not drop down.

Tracy

Charlie3 · July 12, 2015, 03:52:00 PM

650 grain arrow traveling 170 fps is actually on the higher side of the bell curve if you sampled 100 guys I think. More than ample.

Bladepeek · July 12, 2015, 03:55:00 PM

Most of my bows are what many would consider "wimp" bows - mid 40s. I'm in the process of buying/trading for a 50# Bear AuSable just because I don't have any more that heavy and want to work out with a bit more bow weight. Last year I got total penetration on a 235# pig with my 43# RER XR. I have yet to have an arrow not penetrate a deer and do not feel that I HAVE to shoot heavier.

Of course last year it would have made no difference whether I was shooting 25# or 85#. Never got a shot :(

Sam McMichael · July 12, 2015, 04:06:00 PM

There ain't enough difference between 50# and 55# to make any real difference, either in performance on game or ability to control it.

John McCreary · July 12, 2015, 05:39:00 PM

What if we are talking elk? Bear or moose?

pdk25 · July 12, 2015, 09:51:00 PM

If he is really getting that fps with that weight arrow, from everything that I have read, he would be fine. Pretty great performance.

TDHunter · July 12, 2015, 10:09:00 PM

Do you need more then 50lbs.. I think you can kill most game with 50 lbs with good flight, and a sharp broadhead.

If you can shoot a 60lb bow well, is it an advantage? absolutely. I've seen perfectly place shot out of a 50+ lb recurve get minimal penetration on Moose and Mt. Goat. Hit heavy bone, muscle or hide at a slightly perfect angle and you could get bad results.

Bottom Line is:
More weight is better as long as you don't give up arrow flight or accuracy!

People can say there's not much difference with an extra few pounds but that little bit of extra energy could be the difference between splitting bone and killing the animal and just burring in bone.

ChuckC · July 12, 2015, 10:12:00 PM

Well, seems I need one. I get antsy dropping down to 57#.
ChuckC

Coach Jones · July 12, 2015, 10:22:00 PM

My 42 lb Toelke will be with me hunting everything in North America.

http://tradgang.com/noncgi/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=112539

July 12, 2015, 10:24:00 PM

Some 50 pounders can out preform some 60 pounders. I have seen slower 60 pound Hill style bows shoot no faster with the same arrows than a faster 50 pound Hill style bow. Now if you add a curve or two to the limb design, anything can happen. After a few run ins with moose on canoe trips, I lost my desire to shoot one, but if I did ever go for a moose I would pick a faster bow and a tougher arrow. I have no trouble shooting heavy bows, but I still do most of my shooting with bows in the low to upper 50s. As a ground whitetail hunter, shot accuracy and timing and shooting versatility come first. Every so often I take out a heavier bow and shoot a few hundred arrows, being able to do so with a heavy bow makes the bows under 60 shoot better for me.