3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Author Topic: Which woods for less hand shock  (Read 939 times)

Offline dennis rice

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Which woods for less hand shock
« on: November 27, 2009, 08:30:00 PM »
Is there any difference in hand shock on a straight limb bow of the same design using different woods or bamboo
william d. rice

Offline jacobsladder

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3161
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2009, 08:36:00 PM »
i think bow design , tuning , and braceheight are critical....but i do think a heavy wood and the more mass helps absorb some of the shock....
TGMM Family of the Bow

"There's a race of men that dont fit in, A race that can't stay still; So they break the hearts of kith and kin, And they roam the world at will"  Robert Service

Offline Bjorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 8789
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2009, 08:37:00 PM »
My opinion is that hand shock is bad design, bad tiller, bad set up, or any or all three. But not wood type.

Offline dennis rice

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2009, 08:37:00 PM »
Maybe i was thinking backwards i was thinking the heaver limb wood would have more hand shock
william d. rice

Offline Pat B

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 15131
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2009, 11:18:00 PM »
Heavy limb tips will have more shock. Heavy risers will help to absorb some of the shock...but like Bjorn, design, tiller and set up have more to do with hand shock than the wood used.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2009, 08:19:00 AM »
More than  not, hand shock is in the archer and the way they shoot the bow.  I've had guys tell me their bow "loosend their fillings", and when I shot it, I thought it was a great shooting bow.

I would opt for a denser riser..(osage, phenolic, bubinga, etc.) because that would help tame some vibration.  However, you really need to learn to shoot with a soft arm...not a locked elbow, and don't grip the bow like it's a snake you are trying to kill.

Offline Roy Steele

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1087
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2009, 09:20:00 AM »
PAT has it right.I'd like to ad bad tiller when one limb gets home before the other.
DEAD IS DEAD NO MATTER HOW FAST YOUR ARROW GETS THERE
 20 YEARS LEARNING 20 YEARS DOING  20 YEARS TEACHING
  CROOKETARROW

Online Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8324
  • Contributing Member
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2009, 11:00:00 AM »
I agree with Bjorn.  However, all other things being equal, physically heavier limbs will carry a little more unused energy forward to be absorbed by the riser, bow arm, etc. than will physically lighter limbs.  Anyway, that's been my experience.  But the difference is small, and folks who learn to shoot with a soft arm, as George suggests, probably wouldn't notice it.

Offline Apex Predator

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2009, 11:54:00 AM »
The difference in limb mass will be minimal between the lighter core woods and some of the heavier core woods, because you will usually use less of the heavier wood to get the same draw weight.  The biggest factors are limb timing and removing excess weight from the outer limbs while profiling.  

If the archer can spend a couple of days with the bowyer the limb timing can be optimized for that archers draw.  This is seldom practical though, so we settle for tuning the bow to optimize it's shooting characteristics for the individual archer.
I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat vegetables!

Offline snag

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6337
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2009, 12:12:00 PM »
George you hit is on the head!..or bullseye. During a shooting clinic this past summer Rod Jenkins worked with a bunch of us on our shooting form. As we began to adopt what he was asking us to do ALL of our bows became quieter. We were finally letting the bow do what it was built to do without getting in it's way! This probably resulted in less string oscilation and torquing of the bow.
Isaiah 49:2...he made me a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver.

Offline fountain

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 377
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2009, 07:38:00 PM »
i personally think it is in the holder as well.  i have had a hill style bow and it was awful.  i like them and would like to have another, but the straight grip is just not for me.  i get bad hand shock from them everytime.  i know people that shoot them and say they feel no shock.  i like a locator grip.  that is what i am used to shooting.  after shooting my recurve for a good while now, i get some hand shot on my longbow--when others have shot it and say its the best shooting longbow they have ever shot!

its all in the way it is gripped to me--given its built with good craftsmanship.  coming from shooting compounds basically all my life until 2 years ago, the locator-high wrist- style grips are the way to go for me.

Offline RC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4450
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2009, 08:20:00 PM »
I`ve built longbows with Bamboo,hard rock maple ,zebrawood and red elm . Tillered them all for me and the boo was quieter and had less vibration.I also used coreflex for the riser.
  As someone else said tuning and tiller as well as grip play a big part. I believe with all things perfect the wrong grip will make the most difference. On Mudfeathers Wesley Special I can tell a big difference in shock by changing the amount of "hook" on the string with the bottom finger.Regardless, I love a Hill style bow....they made for killing.RC

Offline dennis rice

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2009, 09:05:00 PM »
Thanks everybody im thinking of another hill style bow and just cant make up my mind what woods to choose
william d. rice

Offline gordie

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Which woods for less hand shock
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2009, 08:24:00 PM »
hello dennis,
i agree w/ pat, george,& apex... and the bows to prove it, you are welcome to shoot'em the next time we shoot together.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©