Author Topic: Is this too radical?  (Read 6585 times)

Offline Longcruise

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2021, 06:52:18 PM »
  Cruise  -  Thats pretty much what I'm going for.

Shredd, my thoughts were to start a conversation about those type considerations.

  10-4...  I am not really familiar with that style bow but that's what I was guessing yours would look like with with 12* at the fades and 60" to 64"...

I'm looking for 60 to 62".  I redid it so the pic below shows the old rendition on the right and a newer rendition on the left.  The one on the left is more like B-JS design (thanks for putting that up).  More of a uniform arc that extends 2.25" ahead of the handle which should allow tweaking via width, frontal profile and thickness taper to behave fairly uniformly along it;s length.  That would be for starters with more tweaks later if they might prove to be beneficial.

I have an RD that is fairly mild and I'm looking to build something a bit more speedy that will have more preload.  The mild design is certainly no dog but is quick and well mannered.  This new one is looking to be a little quicker without being too ill mannered.

"Every man is the creature of the age in which he lives;  very few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of the time"     Voltaire

Shredd

  • Guest
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2021, 07:13:23 PM »
  I heard those reflexed R/D bows are supposed to be fast but did not ever see any speed numbers on them other than the wtt contest... And who knows whether those bows were just built for speed or to last and shoot well also...  If not built right I heard they can be floppy...

Offline Buemaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3182
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2021, 05:30:54 AM »
If you measure along the curve how long is one limb from end of fadeout to string notch?

Offline Longcruise

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2021, 11:12:34 AM »
If you measure along the curve how long is one limb from end of fadeout to string notch?

23.5 Inches.  Which would make about a 64" bow.  That is not the target however.  The actual target would be for a 60" bow and will call for a small adjustment to the drawing.
"Every man is the creature of the age in which he lives;  very few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of the time"     Voltaire

Online Crooked Stic

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6259
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2021, 12:05:31 PM »
You prolly need to go ahead and build one with not too much FT and let us know  :bigsmyl:
High on Archery.

Shredd

  • Guest
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2021, 12:16:40 PM »
If you want Fast, Bue makes a fast bow...  You might want to pick that guy's brain...   

  Bue...  Are you familiar with or have you made any of these R/D bows that are reflexed at brace??  What are your feelings and thoughts on them??  That question goes out to everyone else out there also...

  Kenny makes a fast bow also...  That last bow he posted looks good and has a decent bit of reflex in the limbs...  Kenny did you shoot that one through the chrony??  What are the numbers??

I wanna learn from this thread that the Cruiser posted also...  I always did like the look of the Shrew but that is a short bow and I can see how having those reflex limbs could be good for a bow that size...

Online B-JS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2021, 12:34:05 PM »
My 54" is pretty reflexed at brace.
It's fast an efficient.
Don't have numbers (because i have no Shooting Mashine to make accurate measurements), but everybody, that has one is satisfied.
But the 60" with the serious preload is even faster.

Offline Longcruise

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #27 on: February 28, 2021, 02:01:02 PM »
Is the bottom pic the 60"?
"Every man is the creature of the age in which he lives;  very few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of the time"     Voltaire

Online B-JS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #28 on: February 28, 2021, 02:07:10 PM »
No. That's both two (LH and RH) 54" Strung and unstrung.
The 60" is the bow i posted before.


Shredd

  • Guest
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #30 on: February 28, 2021, 09:00:11 PM »
 :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Offline williwaw

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 166
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #31 on: March 01, 2021, 04:44:10 AM »
what is the purpose of the deflex with a glass bow? I understand the deflex in a R/D wood design is helpful to reduce stress, but that does not seem necessary with glass.

Online B-JS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #32 on: March 01, 2021, 05:28:01 AM »
Build a bow without and you'll know.
One big issue in a design without deflex is handshock.

Offline Buemaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3182
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #33 on: March 01, 2021, 05:33:07 AM »
Many opinions on this, but you do not need the nocks to be way in front of back of handle in order to make a fast stable bow. I do not make these short RD bows with a lot of recurve at brace. They do not seem to be that fast. The one pictured is a 66 inch ntn with nocks in line with back of handle. Handle between fadeouts are 22 inches, limb lenght from tip of fades to nocks are 22 inches. Many say a 66 inch bow is too long to handle in the woods, but what the heck it is only three inches at both ends compared to a 60 inch. The last time I made this model shot trough a chrony from a shooting machine, 55 pound bow at 28 inch draw with a arrow 9,75 grain pr pound the speed was 192 feet. The one that shot 192 feet had a 3/4 inch shorter handle and the reverse taper a bit shorter at the tips. I will test this new one when I get it done. I do not hazzle with Carbon, wood and glass is good enough for me.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2021, 06:10:57 AM by Buemaker »

Offline Longcruise

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #34 on: March 01, 2021, 09:15:31 AM »
Very informative Bue.   :thumbsup:
"Every man is the creature of the age in which he lives;  very few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of the time"     Voltaire

Shredd

  • Guest
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2021, 09:35:46 AM »
Bue how wide are your limbs at the fades and the nocks?? Do you have a side view of that bow unbraced??  I suspect your bow is shooting 188 to 189 fps @10gpp...  I would like to get my r/d bow up to that speed...   I seem to hit the wall at 184 to 186...  You were talking about limb length... What are your feelings on that??

Offline Buemaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3182
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2021, 02:00:50 PM »
Shredd, here you go. Width at end of fadeout is 34mm/1,34» and a straight taper to 1/2» just before nocks. I like long risers and shorter limbs. This one have a 22» riser and 22» limbs.

Online Roy from Pa

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 20835
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2021, 02:05:57 PM »
Nice Bue and a longer riser with short limbs are faster than long limbs...

My old bear take down, the riser and limbs are pretty much the same length and it smokes arrows.


Offline williwaw

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 166
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #38 on: March 01, 2021, 03:34:47 PM »
Shredd, here you go. Width at end of fadeout is 34mm/1,34» and a straight taper to 1/2» just before nocks. I like long risers and shorter limbs. This one have a 22» riser and 22» limbs.

Bue
thanks for your observations about deflex.
Are the full draw and braced pics you posted yesterday in the "what did you do today" thread the same bow as the unbraced bow pic above?

Offline Buemaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3182
Re: Is this too radical?
« Reply #39 on: March 01, 2021, 04:11:49 PM »
Yes, the same bow.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©