3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Main Menu

52" vs 60"

Started by H-MANEOD, March 13, 2013, 07:01:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

H-MANEOD

I currently shoot a 54" recurve and I am thinking about getting a new bow.  What does anyone feel the pros/cons are for a new 52" or a 60" bow. I will be ordering it at 45#@28".
Kurt Heitman
Retired USAF EOD 1989-2009
MADDOG
FEDORA

Orion

A lot depends on your draw length (and bow design, of course) .  Folks with short draw lengths can shoot either.  Folks with longer draw lengths, more than 28 inches, often find that short bows stack more and are more unstable for them.

Gump21Bravo

I will second what Orion said

NIGEL01

I have a short draw and shoot a Kmag with no problems, course I've got a 60" Browning and the draw seems smooth as butter, so I guess it depends on your draw length and what kind of hunting you do.

Bruinbow

Short bows are beter for hunting but dont pinch yourself . With your short draw you should have no problem .

H-MANEOD

If you were just shooting for pleasure, which bow would you choose?
Kurt Heitman
Retired USAF EOD 1989-2009
MADDOG
FEDORA

Brock

as mentioned...if draw length is under 27 inches then either...if 28+ then I would worry about stacking and finger pinch.

for pleasure I would want same as for hunting without the weight...smooth, steady, natural pointing, encourages good clean release, easy to match arrows for proper flight.
Keep em sharp,

Ron Herman
Compton's Traditional Bowhunters
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers
PBS Assoc since 1988
NRA Life
USAF Retired (1984-2004)

Fletcher

If shooting for pleasure, I would definitely go with the 60".  Shorter bows are fine, but just not as stable or comfortable.  I draw 27 with a recurve and am most comfortable with 58" for a hunter and 60 or 62 for just shooting.  Find a 45 lb Martin Hunter and you will see what I mean.
Good judgement comes from experience.  Experience comes from bad judgement.

"The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing."

"An archer doesn't have to be a bowhunter, but a bowhunter should be an archer."

chanumpa

Just my own preferance here but its no contest for the longer bow.

Sharpend60

I prefer longer myself, even for hunting.

Ray Lyon

I think bow design plays a part in it. I have a 56" Super Shrew Classic Hunter and a 1971 60" Bear Super Kodiak.  I use them interchangably and last year at the 30 target 3D range I shot a couple of times each week. I would notice no significant difference in my scores between the two bows. The Super Shrew is handier in my Double Bull ground blind as I can shoot without conciously canting it to avoid the roof of the blind.
Tradgang Charter Member #35

Wheels2

A lot depends on the riser.  Short riser with longer working limb length will feel smoother than the same length if the bow has a longer riser and shorter working limb length.
Either way you can't cheat on string pinch/angle
Super Curves.....
Covert Hunter Hex9h
Morrison Max 6 ILF
Mountain Muffler strings to keep them quiet
Shoot as much weight as you can with accuracy

longrifle346

I really think it depends on the bow. I shoot a longer draw length, 29+, but I have a 1971 52" Kodiak Magnum I use for tree stands, stillhunting through thick brush, and from some ground blinds. It just barely starts to stack at anchor, nothing uncomfortable, like a "soft" wall on a compound. Normally I shoot long bows, 66", but this old KMag has become a really good friend....
If you find yourself in a fair fight? Your tactics suck!


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©