Part 5-
Feel during the draw sequence
Even though both bows have different weights written on the limbs, they both felt and drew surprisingly similar. The Cyclone felt smoother and lighter in weight at the back end of the draw with the Firefly having a very little bit of noticeable stacking as I hit anchor. This lack of stacking in the Cyclone may have been caused by the increased reflex design in the limbs and perhaps to some degree the use of bamboo cores. Shooters with LONG draws will likely really enjoy the smoothness of the Cyclone limbs at the end of their draw cycle. If you prefer a “wall” at your anchor, the Firefly with its laminated cores is the choice out of these two bows. If you like a wall as you hit anchor, I’m sure Bryce could build a little “stack” into the limb if desired. As you can see in the pictures, the Cyclone has a little extra reflex in the limb which really makes the bow feel very smooth during the draw cycle.
Perceived Sound
The Cyclone with its 2 rubber cat whiskers had a slightly higher pitched “ting” sound at the shot with a very short audible cycle.
The Firefly with the 4 small wool puffs had a low “thump” sound at the shot with a slowly fading “hum” in the string.
Again, the Cyclone had rubber cat whiskers installed and I have never found them to be as effective as properly placed wool puffs. Had I decided to install wool puff on the Cyclone, the results may have been slightly different, but other than adding a second brass nock and adjusting brace height, I did not want to alter the test bow further. I would say both bows had average to below average noise at the shot. As is common with 3 piece bows, neither were as whisper quiet as one piece longbows typically are. As is common with most bow designs, both bows were quieter shooting split finger than when shot 3 under.
Feel at the shot
I could feel a tight and FAST limb vibration sequence with a VERY short recovery time in the handle of the Cyclone after the shot.
The Firefly had a wider and slower feeling vibration pulse rate and took quite a bit longer to recover from limb vibration in comparison to the Cyclone.
The differences of the limb recovery no doubt influenced the sound each bow made at the shot. The pitch and feel of each bow could likely be changed with the replacement or deletion of a number of influencing factors, including string material, silencers, serving thickness and nock type/fit, but I will say the limbs just felt a hair better balanced on the Cyclone compared to the Firefly. Neither bow was “shocky”.
Accuracy
As with any of my bow reviews, the reports are subjective and I can only articulate what I feel and experience when comparing the test bows to the bows I have on hand. I don’t have a hooter shooter machine or a chronograph, so my mediocre shooting abilities are the only gauge I have for comparisons. What I will say, is many archers who have been shooting traditional equipment for a while seem to “KNOW” almost as soon as the first arrow is drawn and loosed if a particular bow is a going to increase or decrease the shooters accuracy potential. Although the shelf was a little low for my hands, this was one of those bows that fell into the “High Potential” category. I immediately found myself able to hit where I was focused on from the first arrow (even before I adjusted the brace height slightly and added a second nock). Since I’ve had the bow longer than anticipated, I don’t feel this was just a honeymoon experience as I’ve had a chance to shoot the bow off and on over the past few months with similar results. These two bows shot so close together group-wise and the point of aim was so similar, to declare a winner in the accuracy department would be tough. Depending on the day, I might be able to shoot one more accurately than the other, but for consistency in the grip and value to performance, I have to give the edge to the Cyclone, especially since I’ve had a few years to familiarize myself with the Firefly and only a comparatively few shooting sessions with the Cyclone. The smooth feel of the limbs during the draw sequence and the hardly perceivable post-shot limb vibrations would likely contribute to the Cyclone being a little more consistent and accurate for my shooting style over time. I shot both bows split finger and 3 under and accuracy was consistent shooting either way.
I won’t bore you with pictures of targets filled with arrows tightly clustered together, but I did want to share with you a picture of what the Cyclone would consistently do whenever I had a chance to take it outside. Here is a typical “end of the day” 3 arrow shot sequence from various unknown distances. This is how I like to wrap up my shooting sessions after working on form or something particular I’ve identified as needing more work.
Average 3 shot group at 15 yds…
