Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: BWallace10327 on December 04, 2015, 11:10:00 PM

Title: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: BWallace10327 on December 04, 2015, 11:10:00 PM
Would the majority of people prefer using a bow that they shoot well and belief is better looking, as opposed to shooting a bow exceptionally well that fails to have the same visual appeal?
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Orion on December 05, 2015, 12:34:00 PM
Of course, one doesn't need to shoot one or the other.  Most of my bows not only shoot great, they look good as well.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: pinky on December 05, 2015, 02:59:00 PM
I have had both of these recurves for quit a few years. The Hatfield is the one that i take to the woods with me.  I shoot more accurately and tighter groups with it. Maybe it is the weight difference, maybe the cut of the grip, maybe both.

  (http://i1274.photobucket.com/albums/y434/danamhay/Mobile%20Uploads/1442553740_zpsa898b710.jpg) (http://s1274.photobucket.com/user/danamhay/media/Mobile%20Uploads/1442553740_zpsa898b710.jpg.html)

Dale's "Good Medicine" is definitely easier on the eye.    :)  I love the colors and the profile. Maybe it is the idea of the inevitable character marks from going afield that has kept it at home.
  (http://i1274.photobucket.com/albums/y434/danamhay/Mobile%20Uploads/c616e838-c31a-4f80-887f-7cd395b19f7e_zps0yw5cozr.jpg) (http://s1274.photobucket.com/user/danamhay/media/Mobile%20Uploads/c616e838-c31a-4f80-887f-7cd395b19f7e_zps0yw5cozr.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: damascusdave on December 05, 2015, 03:01:00 PM
I have enough good looking bows that I shoot well not to even give it any thought

DDave
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: dbd870 on December 05, 2015, 04:48:00 PM
Have to hit, most important thing.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: YORNOC on December 05, 2015, 05:59:00 PM
Definitely one that shoots better.
With custom wood bows, I need to practice a little more than with my ugly ILF set up. Which is very easy to pick up and shoot.
I did not have my usual time to practice this year due to my job, so I opted for the ugly ILF and it once again paid off.
If I can practice, I shoot the pretty bows just as well, so I would use one of those over the ILF.
But I will NEVER sell it, I have shot so much game with it.
A good shooting bow will always win for me.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: David Mitchell on December 05, 2015, 06:15:00 PM
Looks seemed not to matter as much back in the 60s when I got into it.  Most of the time we would spray paint them in a camo pattern anyway.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: LBR on December 05, 2015, 06:40:00 PM
When I sold bows, at least 9 times out of 10 the pretty bow sold first regardless.  The "right" brand means a lot to some...saw a guy get downright mad when he found out his expensive bow was made by the same company that made cheaper bows that he snubbed.

To me, the main variable is the nut pulling the string.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Matty on December 05, 2015, 07:26:00 PM
I have definately seen the best of both worlds. (Cool subject but the way) there are many amazing bowyers out there. I believe all of them make a bow that performs well. I feel however. The shooters personal style might not match the design of the bow, making for what appears to be an errant bow,Regardless of how pretty the bow may be. Once the shooting style and bow match its awesome! I think that's the pot of gold we strive for. Great looks and great shooter.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Longtoke on December 05, 2015, 08:23:00 PM
Function over form every time
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Thumper Dunker on December 05, 2015, 08:28:00 PM
If I want something pretty for the wall I would get a picture. Bow have to shoot good.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Doc Nock on December 05, 2015, 08:30:00 PM
With the myriad of incredible custom bowyers out there with high performance bows, I don't see why anyone would HAVE to settle for a great shooting ugly bow...

Definitely, I'd rather have a great shooting bow, then a great looking, but it today's world, you can have both...

Or so I found out...
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: highlow on December 05, 2015, 08:55:00 PM
Doc Nock X2
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Stumpkiller on December 05, 2015, 10:19:00 PM
'Tis the archer that makes the bow shoot well.

And good looks are subjective.  I like the clean looks of simple one-piece bows with solid wood risers.  Knobs or bolts on a bow are like warts on a face.  Others are of different opinions.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: mangonboat on December 05, 2015, 10:29:00 PM
Back in the 70's I spray painted every new bow with green , gray, flat camo paint, and I still love that look.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Sam McMichael on December 05, 2015, 10:30:00 PM
Fortunately, we really don't need to make that choice. There are countless bows out there that shoot great and look just as great. I believe everybody can find a beautiful bow that fits his shooting style.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Hud on December 06, 2015, 02:34:00 AM
A good bow will shoot better with a well made arrow, than one made carelessly.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: Mo0se on December 06, 2015, 08:18:00 AM
My wife always says I'm good looking no matter what I shoot.  :)
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: ISP 5353 on December 06, 2015, 09:27:00 AM
It has to shoot well if it is a keeper.
Title: Re: Better Looking vs Better Shooting
Post by: stagetek on December 06, 2015, 09:56:00 AM
I've never seen an ugly bow. Some just have a bit more or less character than others.