Can someone tell me about the Muck Arctic Pro Hunting Boot. Good or Bad? Thanks, Warren...
for me bad. my feet sweat bad and my socks work down. i have never worn mine hunting for those reasons. my experience has been at work.
A lot of people I know really like them as for me I don't like them my feet sweat in them & they kill my back.
They tend to be really (REALLY) warm, even in cooler weather. I was out bird hunting in an old pair today, and I changed socs twice in 4 hours. Also, they don't seem to offer much stability- your foot can swim around a bit.
Also, the company recently received a fair amount of bad press for botched PR in a fundraising effort. It's unclear (at least to me) what exactly happened, but the company's own handling of it seemed less than honest, at best. So it makes sense, the agency that benefited is a very anti-hunting org. It seems Muck may have forgotten their customer base, for a while, at least. You can find way more info than you need on social media / Google.
I have the chore boot [don't know about the artic pro] and like it--if I'm not doing tons of hiking. To go in to stand in cool/cold wet/damp weather, they are nice.
Have a pair for the last 2 years and love them for stand hunting. Wear a pair of polypropylene socks liners under your regular socks if your feet tend to sweat and your good. I find them to be really comfortable.
I have had the Wetlands for a few years and really like them. I have a few spots where I need to cross water or take the canoe. I would imagine the artic pro's to be over kill around here. I can wear the wetlands with good socks down into the teens in comfort. For water and mud they are great. For long hikes and steep stuff I go to Danners or Keen's these days.
I have the Wetland model. Seem well made but I have not worn them much so don't know if moisture will be problem. They are heavier than my other rubber boots but probably a lot warmer. I feel clumsy in them but it may just be me. I have used them during last years snows for chores and they seem OK in the warmth dept.
I have a pair of the wetlands. Ok Boots but after I heard of Muck boots Donating to HSUS, i have lost any interest in these boots.
I know they now deny they the donation and later said it was employees acting independently. At this point they knew they were in deep crap and had evidence on their Facebook page which was still posted even after denying it. Info they came out with afterward trying to save face was incorrect and False which lessens my respect even more.
How can a Farming/Hunting company make a donation to an organization that is outspoken against such activities?
I will never Buy another pair.
I have had Arctic Pro's for two or three years. I really like them in really cold weather. I think they would be over kill if you walked a lot in them.
I have the Arctic Sport model. Very warm and comfortable.
But no good for me in the woods. The neoprene is being picked away by branches and twigs, looking pretty frayed all around. Maybe good in muddy, marshy conditions.
This will be my last pair.
I bought a pair prior to Muck Boots donations to H.S.U.S. and their cover up. Will not be buying another pair.
http://beefmagazine.com/blog/muck-boots-keeps-stepping-muck-social-media
I prefer the newer Lacrosse Aerohunter
I like the boots, very warm (wear heavy wool socks). Hate the politics.
Hmm,,,,,I never heard this about Muck boots!
If I can find proof they do or did intentially support HSUS I will burn them and go back to my Lacross which I've had for about 20yrs and with my lacross other than being a bit heavy they held up and worked like a charm,, I do remember that if you tucked in your pants it would bind them up right right where the pants settled in at and they would make a "pop" sound when you walked which annoyed me big time.
as for Mucks I won't go into why I liked them anymore until I know more about the company.
I'm with JMG. I have a pair of Muck Woody Max boots. Have lasted quite well. Of course they're heavily insulated, but that's what I want for the cold weather in Northern Wisconsin during November. You wouldn't need an insulated model in Arkansas.
All this being said, there are other good rubber bottom, neoprene top boots out there, LaCross and Boggs, to name a few. I won't buy another pair of Mucks.
I didn't know about Mucks and the HSUS thing. I will certainly take my business elsewhere with this information.
Too bad, because they make a good boot, but I don't need to spend my money on those who support anti hunters.
Thanks for the info, I hadn't heard. Timberland lost my business many years ago when they withdrew their sponsorship of the Iditarod because it was cruel to the dogs! You've got to wonder who works in these companies PR depts.!!
I have had a pair of Woody Max for 5 years. I will by another pair when they wear out. I use Lacrosse for my non-insulated boots but Muck for when it's cold. I personally think the HS thing was blown way out of proportion.
They were very good when they first came out, and they were a good value then, too. The last pair I bought were pretty high, but I haven't bought a pair in at least two years, so I don't know what's going on with them these days.
The first boot I reach for now If I'm not hiking in a long ways. They're warm and if I want more support I can wear ankle braces inside them. I wore mine for 10 days straight while on snowshoes and they were the perfect choice. They seem to be good to about -10C if you're moving they're good way below that.
I have a pair of the Woody Max and really like them. I only wear them when temps are freezing or below. Very warm and comfortable. Not sure what I'll buy when they wear out, but they look like they've got some years left.
I looked for the link, but couldn't find it. Muck donated to a local humane shelter in memory of one of their employees parents that had passed away. The Muck Boots website ran an explanation of what happened. Their explanation seemed legit.
I agree with Mike. As someone already said, it would make no sense whatsoever for a company that relies primarily on farmers and hunters to donate to ARA organization. The HSUS has fooled more than a few people acting like they are part of the Humane Society.
I use the Woody and like it. My wife has several pairs, from the garden shoes to mid-calf boots. She loves hers.
I have the arctic sport and the chore boot, love them both.
Mine are the Forester(?) I think. They are a discontinued style so I got them on discount. They work for me, a little heavy but fit well with thick socks.
The last pair I bought was the chore boot, I believe. They are better for warmer weather and less muddy conditions. I also have the Woody Max, I think, which is very warm, but I don't use them much down here any more. I've been thinking about going to something like the Bean boot. I definitely think Muck has gotten pretty proud of their boots, based on the last price I saw for them.
I want to thank everybody for the Info. I am a diabetic, and I have poor circulation in my feet. I understand when someone say you don't need them in Arkansas. But it is cold and wet here. Are hunting season ends in late Feb. So I have to find the right boot for the cold. Thanks again, Warren...
I also have issues with cold feet, mucks do the best job, esp if stand hunting .
I forget who makes them, but there are some remote controlled insoles to keep your feet warm. A buddy of mine has them and loves them.
warren, Im diabetic not on med just watch my diet.I bought mucks 3 yrs ago standared wetlands i believe.
only boot that keep my feet warm i love mucks buy a pair for everyday soon. they are pricy especialy kids i just bought my 7 yr old a pair for i believe 90 dollors. i wish the uppers were a little tuffer though.
Muck makes the most comfortable rubber boot I've ever worn. I hunt public land, and regularly hike in 1.5 to 2 miles in my Muck boots. I find the boot to be true to size and perfect for the weather conditions in Texas and Oklahoma. I have not owned or even seen the Muck boot being considered but the lower level boot I own is perfect for my needs. Good luck in your search. As for the politics mentioned, to each his own. I find it difficult to condemn a company or individual for a one time error in judgement. :campfire:
Thanks Dink and you are right Bill.
The following is from Muck.
Donation to a local Humane Society
This entry was posted on August 6, 2014 by Muck Boot Store.
The Muck Boot Store is the oldest, independent online retailer of The Original Muck Boot Company Muck Boots and we were saddened to see that The Original Muck Boot Company announced a donation to the Humane Society of the United States on their facebook page.
Thankfully, we have since learned that the donation never happened. The Original Muck Boot Company, like many people, was duped into thinking their local Humane Society was the same as HSUS when they communicated their donation. Several of their employees collected money for the Humane Society of Rhode Island, which is a local animal shelter. They were proud of this and wanted to share the news on Facebook. The controversy started when whoever posted the information did not know the difference between the two organizations and mistakenly said the donation was for HSUS. They have since clarified what happened.
Who a company supports says a lot about their values. At The Muck Boot Store, we are major supporters of farmers, hunters, and the military-- that is what got us into this business. Every year we choose a charity that is important to us to give back. The charity we raised money for this year was the Fallen Patriot Fund which supports the families of US military personnel who were killed or seriously injured during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
We believe The Original Muck Boot Company also shares our values. They made a stupid mistake and confused two organizations that they shouldn't have. But the fact is they made a donation to a local animal shelter and in no way are supporting an anti-hunting and anti-farming organization. They are bad communicators but they do not have bad values.
The Muck Boot Store would like to thank everyone who was rightly upset about this mistake. You have helped bring attention to HSUS's agenda and misleading tactics. Fewer people will be tricked into supporting HSUS because of the attention you brought to this issue.
...what about the Humane Society of Rhode Island stating they NEVER received any money from Muck Boot Company and has no idea what they are talking about?
My reason for stating so is below:
http://oregonoutdoorcouncil.org/the-original-muck-boot-controversy-what-every-company-should-learn-from-it/
From Sean O'Brien on Aug 7th on their Facebook page.
A few days ago we made a series of mistakes here and on our other social media channels. Words can't express how sorry we are that we've caused so much disappointment in our brand. There's been a lot of speculation as to what happened, and clearly our initial statement caused even more confusion.
While we've been quiet here, please know that we've been reading every one of your comments and I want to personally address your concerns.
Here's exactly what happened...we suffered the loss of a colleague a few months ago. Our colleague had a long fight with cancer and had a cat that was by his side until the very end. Because of that, his family requested that -- in lieu of flowers -- donations by employees, not the company, be made to a local animal shelter in his honor. The Humane Association of Northwestern Rhode Island (HANRI) was identified as our local shelter; it's about ten miles from our office in Smithfield, Rhode Island.
Here are the mistakes we made: first, we posted photos on our Facebook page and on Instagram of an employee-sponsored collection effort in our warehouse, which was disrespectful to our colleague and completely inappropriate. Despite our good intent, we should never have used these corporate channels for what was a private matter. Then, we incorrectly tagged Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) in the posts, when the money was actually intended for our local animal shelter. And finally, when the statement went up in an attempt to clarify the events, the money hadn't yet been delivered, because the funds were still being collected. Cash and personal checks were hand-delivered yesterday by the same employees who raised the funds.
Needless to say, our entire team has learned some hard lessons this week.
We know it is you, our customers, who have helped build the Muck Boot brand to what it is today. We would never intentionally alienate you, and we sincerely apologize if we have done so this past week. We've worked hard over the years to build quality footwear and to build a brand that is broadly trusted – we hope that you'll give us a chance to earn back that trust.
Farmers, outdoor enthusiasts and sportsmen are among our most loyal customers and at the core of what we do and why we do it. You can continue to count on us for the very best footwear and to never forget who we work for – you, our customers.
— Sean O'Brien, director of footwear, Muck Boots.
****he later replies******
The Original Muck Boot Company We've seen the question in this string. We've stated publicly....no, The Original Muck Boot Company has not contributed to Humane Society of United States (HSUS). We appreciate and understand your concerns over this but assure you, we'd never support any organization that is so polarizing and undermines the livelihoods of you, our core customers.
_____________
They goofed and appear to have tried to correct the miscommunication.
I just went to the swamps of SC in my new Mucks. They beat Bass Pro's boots all day long.
I still prefer Lacrosse - no confusion on where they stand. And the new aerohunter boots are the bomb
My last pair of Mucks lasted only 3 years before cracking. I've since gone back to Lacrosse boots.
I had a pair of the arctic boots. I walked a lot in the winter with them. The bottoms were stiff for hunting for me, and they only lasted a couple of years before cracking and leaking. I have had much better luck ,and foot stability in LaCrosse boots.
I had a pair of the arctic boots. I walked a lot in the winter with them. The bottoms were stiff for hunting for me, and they only lasted a couple of years before cracking and leaking. I have had much better luck ,and foot stability in LaCrosse boots.
I love mine, I have cold feet and these boots keep them warm. I live in the artic north though.
I'm on my second pair of the Woody Max model. The original pair lasted 7 or 8 years. I love them. Best rubber boot I've ever had.
I have a pair of Lacrosse for mild weather and a pair of Mucks for when it gets cold.
You won't find a pair of boots that are easier to get on and off then Mucks!
Good Hunting,
Craig
For me, the last 7 years of Lacrosse are not that good. And it is hard to find them in green.
Muck donated funds to PETA and made a big deal out of it....
I don't buy anything from Muck
i like mine...warm for setting
QUOTE] Muck donated funds to PETA and made a big deal out of it.... [/QUOTE]
First I've heard of that. When did it happen?
*edit* Did a search, couldn't find anything on it other than the supposed HSUS donation that turned out to be false.
It was not false....they did it in the name of one of their employees, then when the poop hit the fan they did some fancy PR backpeddling but it did happen. HSUS and PETA are one and the same.
Love mine, very comfortable for whitetail hunting.
I just tried both on and went with Lacrosse this past weekend. No regrets yet and were dramatically more comfortable then the mucks.
I agree HSUS and PETA support each other. The donation was made to the Humane Society of Rhode Island. The HSUS obviously chose that name to fool people into thinking they were associated with their local Humane Societies.
Not that I trust a CEO I don't know. Common sense tells me it makes no financial sense to donate to an organization that is against 99% of their customers.
I prefer the LaCross Alpha Burlys myself.
I will be living in mine for the best part of November.