Went stumpin today plus some scouting and shed hunting. I took some new arrows I just made and mounted the broad head horizonal. Its a Stos 160. Flew a foot high at 20 yds. Better off to go vertical mount or?
When I had my arrows cut to come almost back to the shelf I liked them vertical,but I now have them longer and don't really care how they end up on there. I don't think it should have affected how you arrow flew though.
Been mounting mine horizontal for many many years, with fewer issues than vertical. I feel less potential for deflection due to air resistance, and less visual "interference" by having the blade up in my line of sight.
I like mine horizontal. Like the above post, mainly to keep it out of my line of sight.
I make sure my arrow spin true once the stos is glued on. I don't care how they end up vertical or horizontal. I find no difference in how they shoot.
I do mine at an angle so that when canted at full draw, they are horizontal. It has nothing to do with flight characteristics or tuning, but rather just so my sight picture is the same every time I pull the string back.
Sounds like you may have a tuning issue to deal with, maybe???
Bisch
Might be a tune issue Bisch. Its a new bow to me and I just started making arrows. These are my first set. I ordered 65-70 lb spine ash shafts. Didnt notice till later that that was for a 125 gr.point. Im shooting 70lbs and according to a website I looked at I should have bought 80-85 with a 160 tip. I may have to buy Alum shafts but really wanted to shoot wood for this season. 3 Rivers is out of 80lb ash shafts as of last week. Maybe some Doug Fir?
Doug Fir is an excellent choice for wood shafts. There are some sponsors here that may have what you are looking for who will get you what you need.
Horizontal. Vertical is just weird. :)
I mount mine horizontal as well. Don't like vertical as I see the top blade
I mount mine with the top blade at about the 2:00 position. This hides the blades behind the riser and the sight picture looks the same as when I shoot field tips.
I mount mine on a 45* angle so the blades are out of my sight picture. This also allows the back of the broadhead to contact a knuckle on my drawing hand, which I use as a draw check.
Horizontal, as I figure that way they are slicing through the wobbles of paradox recovery rather than swimming side to side like a fish.
No idea if it truly makes any difference; but with anything that shoots consistancy is the first step to accuracy.
It does allow for easier fletching clearance when putting them in a bow quiver. You can alternate the cock feather easily if it's always in the same relationship with the two-blade heads.
QuoteOriginally posted by Bisch:
I do mine at an angle so that when canted at full draw, they are horizontal. It has nothing to do with flight characteristics or tuning, but rather just so my sight picture is the same every time I pull the string back.
Sounds like you may have a tuning issue to deal with, maybe???
Bisch
Same...mine are horizontal when I'm at full draw with my NORMAL cant.
QuoteOriginally posted by Bisch:
I do mine at an angle so that when canted at full draw, they are horizontal. It has nothing to do with flight characteristics or tuning, but rather just so my sight picture is the same every time I pull the string back.
Sounds like you may have a tuning issue to deal with, maybe???
Bisch
3X on this one
When I did a bunch of internet searches last year and spoke with old timers I know I came to the conclusion that there was no single, big advantage which anyone could point to regarding Horizontal vs. Vertical.
I shoot with my BH's horizontal as it feels more natural to me. (Sight Picture)
Others mileage may vary...
Fred Bear did verticle however he was in the business to sell Razorheads and he wanted you to get a good look at them at full draw.
To each his own, I'd try them both ways and see which you shoot better with. I prefer them oriented vertically coinciding with my slight cant(1:00 to 7:00), as I'm less prone to pick up anything in my peripheral vision with the possible exception of the ferrule, which isn't much different in perceived length than the long field points I shoot. I happen to believe that most folks are very aware of the end of the arrow in their peripheral site picture, although no truly "instinctive" shooter would ever admit to such blasphemy, lol! I would think horizontal would subconsciously make the arrow look two inches longer. Just my 2 cents!