I'm seriously thinking about purchasing a new SK and I'm torn between the regular SK and the Grayling Green. Has anyone shot both? I'm assuming the regular SK may be a bit heavier due to the Dymondwood, but any feedback comparing the 2 would be appreciated. Also, I draw 29.5 so feedback on the 60 vs the 64" would be helpful.
Thanks...
I would go with the new green look....retro style for sure!
Also, I too draw about thirty inches, and prefer the 60" bows.
I would go with the new green look....retro style for sure!
Also, I too draw about thirty inches, and prefer the 60" bows. I have been shooting a 64" longbow for this hunting season, and for me, even though it is just a bit more length, I find it to be a bit of an inconvenience!
If I had a a 28" draw or longer left hand, I would use the 64". Even at my short draw the 64" could pack in really tight groups. Just roll it over when shooting down out of a tree stand. I am a big fan of the SKs, not the fastest recurve on the market, but none of the deer that I shot with them knew that.
I have the 64'' and draw 29.5 and it is smooth drawing and very accurate.Any one with longer than a 28'' draw praises this bow.
Go GREEN!!!!!
Green!
I agree green!
I would be looking for an original Grayling Super K, 64 inches...prices have dropped considerably lately...the Grayling bows are the best Bear ever made in my opinion
DDave
Don't know what draw weight you need, but there's a 2012 grayling green in the classifieds right now. 60" 60@28. I think the guy is asking $300 but there is a chip on one of the quiver mounts.