Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Xavier on June 28, 2013, 06:01:00 PM

Title: Easton 1916 - legacy vs. camo hunter superlite
Post by: Xavier on June 28, 2013, 06:01:00 PM
What is the main difference between Legacy 1916 and Camo Hunter 1916 superlite??

I shoot both - once dialed in - the legacy IS heavier and uses heavier field points than the superlites.

What is the actual difference.

FWIW - the Camo Hunter superlites seem slightly under spined and make some contact with the outer edge of the arrow rest (off the shelf). Both types of arows are the same length. Only difference in set-up is point weight. Legacy uses 150 grain and Camo Hunter uses 75grain.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Easton 1916 - legacy vs. camo hunter superlite
Post by: cbCrow on June 28, 2013, 06:52:00 PM
I had both here and they both weigh the same approx 10grs/in. Went to easton they confirm both weigh the same,however the difference is in the nock end. Legacy uses glue on nock approx 10.3grs for mine, the CH uses bushing 7grs, and X nock at 9.6grs other than that they are the same.
Title: Re: Easton 1916 - legacy vs. camo hunter superlite
Post by: Xavier on July 06, 2013, 03:16:00 AM
Ok thank you for that info!
Title: Re: Easton 1916 - legacy vs. camo hunter superlite
Post by: JamesKerr on July 07, 2013, 07:45:00 AM
I don't know what the difference is but I have always found the Legacy's to be the toughest of all the aluminum shafts for me.