Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: H-MANEOD on March 13, 2013, 07:01:00 PM

Title: 52" vs 60"
Post by: H-MANEOD on March 13, 2013, 07:01:00 PM
I currently shoot a 54" recurve and I am thinking about getting a new bow.  What does anyone feel the pros/cons are for a new 52" or a 60" bow. I will be ordering it at 45#@28".
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Orion on March 13, 2013, 07:07:00 PM
A lot depends on your draw length (and bow design, of course) .  Folks with short draw lengths can shoot either.  Folks with longer draw lengths, more than 28 inches, often find that short bows stack more and are more unstable for them.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Gump21Bravo on March 13, 2013, 07:40:00 PM
I will second what Orion said
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: NIGEL01 on March 13, 2013, 08:06:00 PM
I have a short draw and shoot a Kmag with no problems, course I've got a 60" Browning and the draw seems smooth as butter, so I guess it depends on your draw length and what kind of hunting you do.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Bruinbow on March 13, 2013, 08:42:00 PM
Short bows are beter for hunting but dont pinch yourself . With your short draw you should have no problem .
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: H-MANEOD on March 13, 2013, 09:11:00 PM
If you were just shooting for pleasure, which bow would you choose?
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Brock on March 13, 2013, 09:33:00 PM
as mentioned...if draw length is under 27 inches then either...if 28+ then I would worry about stacking and finger pinch.

for pleasure I would want same as for hunting without the weight...smooth, steady, natural pointing, encourages good clean release, easy to match arrows for proper flight.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Fletcher on March 13, 2013, 09:44:00 PM
If shooting for pleasure, I would definitely go with the 60".  Shorter bows are fine, but just not as stable or comfortable.  I draw 27 with a recurve and am most comfortable with 58" for a hunter and 60 or 62 for just shooting.  Find a 45 lb Martin Hunter and you will see what I mean.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: chanumpa on March 13, 2013, 10:35:00 PM
Just my own preferance here but its no contest for the longer bow.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Sharpend60 on March 13, 2013, 11:00:00 PM
I prefer longer myself, even for hunting.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Ray Lyon on March 14, 2013, 01:21:00 PM
I think bow design plays a part in it. I have a 56" Super Shrew Classic Hunter and a 1971 60" Bear Super Kodiak.  I use them interchangably and last year at the 30 target 3D range I shot a couple of times each week. I would notice no significant difference in my scores between the two bows. The Super Shrew is handier in my Double Bull ground blind as I can shoot without conciously canting it to avoid the roof of the blind.
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: Wheels2 on March 14, 2013, 01:47:00 PM
A lot depends on the riser.  Short riser with longer working limb length will feel smoother than the same length if the bow has a longer riser and shorter working limb length.
Either way you can't cheat on string pinch/angle
Title: Re: 52" vs 60"
Post by: longrifle346 on March 14, 2013, 02:04:00 PM
I really think it depends on the bow. I shoot a longer draw length, 29+, but I have a 1971 52" Kodiak Magnum I use for tree stands, stillhunting through thick brush, and from some ground blinds. It just barely starts to stack at anchor, nothing uncomfortable, like a "soft" wall on a compound. Normally I shoot long bows, 66", but this old KMag has become a really good friend....