Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Mudd on February 23, 2012, 08:38:00 PM

Title: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Mudd on February 23, 2012, 08:38:00 PM
I wanted to see if anyone else can tell the difference between these bows.

 (http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc158/mudd57/Training%20photos/th_MOV02002-1.jpg) (http://s218.photobucket.com/albums/cc158/mudd57/Training%20photos/?action=view¤t=MOV02002-1.mp4)

God bless,Mudd
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: on February 23, 2012, 09:04:00 PM
the volume was pretty hard to here, but from what i could tell.
quietest-selfbow,sinew backed
next quietest-bamboo backed osage
noisiest-glass osage

maybe try it a little closer to camera for more volume.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Bob B. on February 23, 2012, 09:04:00 PM
Hey Mudd,

Cool video buddy.  Too bad you do not have a decimeter.  That would give you difinative data.  However, going form the speakers on my puter, I believe the quietest  bow you shot was the middle one, your sinew backed selfbow you recently rediscovered.

Bob.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: ron w on February 23, 2012, 09:15:00 PM
All sounded pretty close to me......with wool puffs they would most likely be almost silent! IMHO!
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: on February 23, 2012, 09:21:00 PM
Mudd,
Even a deaf guy like me can tell your non-glass bows are much quieter.  

Thanks for the vid brother!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: magnus on February 23, 2012, 09:23:00 PM
I had my head phones on and the sinew backed Osage seemed the quietest to me followed by the Hill then the bamboo backed Osage. Like Ron said all 3 would be be silent with some silencers.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Mike Vines on February 23, 2012, 09:27:00 PM
I'm with Matt.  Sinew backed seemed quieter to me as well.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: LA Trapper on February 23, 2012, 10:30:00 PM
Second bow was the quietest.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: mwosborn on February 23, 2012, 10:35:00 PM
Mudd - All 3 sounded pretty quiet on my computer.  Hard to tell though.  What do you say?
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Zradix on February 23, 2012, 10:46:00 PM
Sinew backed had the least string noise .
It however seemed to have a bit of noise from the arrow hitting the shelf or side. Fix that and it would be the quietest.

The first bow seemed quiet till I heard the second bow. Quite a swish and hum from the string.

Third bow had some string noise but also seemed to have a bit of a "knock" after the shot when the limbs stopped.

Thanks for a chance to see some nice bows being shot.
  :thumbsup:    :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Thumper Dunker on February 23, 2012, 10:47:00 PM
The one in the middle. They all sounded pretty good. What ron w said also.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Mudd on February 23, 2012, 10:50:00 PM
I thought all 3 were loud.

I will try using arrows that each bow likes as well as putting the regular string back on the Osage Royale and re-test.

God bless,Mudd
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Michigan Mark on February 23, 2012, 10:53:00 PM
In my opinion (with my ears)the sinew backed Osage seemed quieter but slower or sounded like a longer stroke to me. The Bamboo backed Osage sounded just a couple of hairs louder and faster. The least quiet the glass backed Osage. Would like to hear the difference with some hair or wool silencers.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: stujay on February 24, 2012, 02:41:00 AM
#2 bow the sinew backed was the quietest followed by the bamboo backed and the the 1st bow the glass bow. Enjoyed the video also. Look forward to test #2.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: waknstak IL on February 24, 2012, 09:49:00 AM
Sinew backed was quietest hands down. Bamboo next best and the glass seemed noticeably louder than the other 2
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Ragnarok Forge on February 24, 2012, 10:31:00 AM
Mudd you can buy a decimeter for $29 at Radio Shack.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Mudd on February 24, 2012, 10:55:00 AM
Thanks Matt.  

Now all I need is an extra 29 bucks....lol

I think if I had the extra money I'd spend it on something truly archery related and continue to trust my senses to let me know what's quiet enough.

God bless,Mudd

PS: I have to wait for the weather to get better before I can continue testing.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: stickbowmaniac on February 25, 2012, 07:46:00 AM
2nd bow was the quietest in my opinion
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Night Wing on February 25, 2012, 08:02:00 AM
To my ears, bow #2 was the quietest.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: koops4 on February 25, 2012, 08:03:00 AM
I would agree that the second bow (sinew) was the quietest followed by the bamboo backed.  However the difference was next to nothing IMO.  Thanks for sharing.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Uncle Buck on February 25, 2012, 08:58:00 AM
I agree with Zradix, The second bow was the quietest and the noise seemed more from the rest/side plate than from the string. A quiter rest and that bow would be silent.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: drewsbow on February 25, 2012, 09:20:00 AM
sinew
bamboo
glass
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: SaltyDawg on February 25, 2012, 09:26:00 AM
I could hear either arrow slap, arm guard slap, or both on all three, which made it tough to distinguish between them.

Other than the slap/click, they all sounded pretty quiet.

Rick
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Horne Shooter on February 25, 2012, 09:31:00 AM
For bows with no string silencers, I thought they all did well.  The second was probably best but with some silencers they would really be whisper quiet.  What was the weight of the arrows?
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Red Tailed Hawk on February 25, 2012, 10:45:00 AM
I honestly didnt hear a whole bunch of difference. They all sounded pretty darn quiet to me, I think your safe to leave the string silencers off any one of those bows.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: flint kemper on February 25, 2012, 11:18:00 AM
Mudd, the next time I am in town for a couple of days we can get together and I have access to a high dollar decimeter and we can find out for sure.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Maxx Black on February 25, 2012, 12:03:00 PM
Mudd! I turned the speakers up on the iPad ,then turned the speakers up on my decimeters(hearing aids) and my thoughts are for bow #2 to being the quietest.  Great job on the vedio! Maxx
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Longbow917 on February 25, 2012, 12:19:00 PM
What Drewsbow said!  Purtiest one too!!
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: jsweka on February 25, 2012, 01:41:00 PM
Mudd - I think the sinew/osage bow was easily the quietest.

Maybe I'm full of it here, but it looked like sinew/osage bow had a shorter length and higher brace height.  Am I wrong?  That could be the reason why the sinew/osage is quieter.  

On the bows I've built, higher brace = quieter and shorter length + higher brace = quietest.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Ric O'Shay on February 25, 2012, 02:32:00 PM
Second one.......   :)
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: swampthing on February 25, 2012, 05:36:00 PM
Glass bow had a noticeable "twang." The 2 wood bows are where it's at.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: SpikeMaster on February 25, 2012, 05:48:00 PM
The sinew backed bow was the quietest, followed by the bamboo backed bow and the glass backed one came in last. The glass backed bow wasn't bad, especially since it didn't have string silencers.
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: Brad_Gentry on February 25, 2012, 08:55:00 PM
Roy I didn't hear a whole lot of difference between the three. I'm going to agree with Rick in that I think what you can hear on the video is coming from either your armguard or the arrow going across the strike plate/rest.

Brad
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: wulf on March 10, 2012, 12:42:00 AM
Exactly what Zradix said.  Thanks for letting us see those fine bows!

wulf
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: al221 on March 10, 2012, 02:28:00 AM
That was tough to tell. I'm interested, those bows sure are nice!!
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: awbowman on March 10, 2012, 08:19:00 AM
Sinew backed quiet but like someone said, with silencers and tuned arrows all would be DEADLY quiet
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: JohnnyWayne on March 10, 2012, 10:23:00 AM
2nd was quietest for sure  ;)
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: elkken on March 10, 2012, 02:06:00 PM
#2 sinew backed  ... then #1, and last is #3
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: GMASIUK on March 10, 2012, 02:41:00 PM
Nice video Mudd, the Osage royal sounded the quietest to me then the sinew backed.

I vote you get rid of the trash barrel bow holder.

I cringed, and I just knew as soon as I saw it that one of your bows would end up on the ground. Cool video none the less. Glen
Title: Re: Quietness comparison/test
Post by: JamesKerr on March 10, 2012, 06:42:00 PM
They are all very quiet. That said the sinew backed osage bow was definately the quietest, with the glass bow and bamboo backed osage bow just about tying for second.