I have an older Bear Kodiak Hunter, 45# 60"AMO, and and older Bear Grizzly, 50# 58"AMO and have a question about their different shooting characteristics. The Hunter seems to be a very smooth and pleasant shooter, while the Grizzly seems stiffer. Do you think it is the difference in draw weights or the different AMO lengths, or both? I'm dreaming about a new recurve (50 or 55#) and wondering if I should look at a longer AMO length. Or, do you think it is mostly draw weight and I just need to get used to it?
The length of any bow will make a difference in how the bow performs. Typically a longer bow is easier to shoot than a shorter one. Also it could be the way the bows are made as all Grizzlies I have ever seen only have 1 lamination besides the fiberglass while a Kodiak hunter has 2 lamination which should make it feel smoother.
Believe it or not, at least to me 5# will make a big diference IF YOU ARE NOT USED TO IT. If you are used to shooting 60# and then go back to the 45# then the 50# you probably will not notice much difference. But if you are used to shooting a specific weight and then move up 5# you will notice a significant difference. At least for me.
The difference in bow design I'm sure will make a difference but I'll bet for you right now the 5# increase is what you are noticing the most. John
Many variables to Bear in mind.
I have never been impressed with the mid 60's and later Grizzlys.. Like you I always felt they were a bit rough and a lot of hand shock.. On the other hand I have never really messed with one to try and tune it either..
The Hunter and the Mag both have felt smoother and less hock, but that's just me..
A lot of people really love the Griz