Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: whirl on March 31, 2005, 09:03:00 AM

Title: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: whirl on March 31, 2005, 09:03:00 AM
Wasnt sure where to post this but here it goes.


So.. Me and my friend are thinking of starting to hunt with bows. Weve been thinking of recurves just for the looks of em and it feels more suitable to us    ;)  

We have just listened some advices and form tips from the shop we visited the other day. We held some recurves (cant remember the names though)

Thats about my experience on bows but Ive been reading all sort of things including these boards.

I think that I should buy a good bow right away so that wouldnt kill my enthusiasm for the sport Im feeling right now.

Ive heard that these Martin bows are quite good and I personally like the looks too. And so I think its going to be Mamba or Hunter but the only problem is.. Whats the difference between em? For my untrained eye there arent many differences but I was hoping if you guys could enlighten me on this. And tell me some general things concerning these bows. I mean Ups and Downs kind of things.

Im open to new suggestions too as long as they fall in to the same price catagory    :)  

Thanks mates!
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Bill Carlsen on April 02, 2005, 09:58:00 AM
The Mamba is 58" long and the Hunter is 62" long. I believe the Mamba is the fastest shooter of the two, If I were  going to by a Martin I would like the Mamba because of it's length and its quickness.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: whirl on April 03, 2005, 06:50:00 AM
Thanks for the info!

I guess its going to be Mamba then.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: SCATTERSHOT on April 03, 2005, 08:41:00 PM
I'm sure if you took this to the PowWow section you would get a bunch of info.

JMHO
Gene
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: buckracks7 on April 09, 2005, 05:54:00 PM
Prefer the Mamba.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: joe skipp on April 10, 2005, 03:53:00 AM
If you have a shorter draw length 27-28" then the 58" Mamba would be perfect. The 62" Hunter would be smoother for longer draw lengths. Both bows are excellent choices but for me personally, I prefer the shorter bows. More compact, easy to manuever, better suited for ground hunting. I also believe both bows sell for about the same price.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: mambashooter on September 16, 2010, 11:01:00 PM
Martin Mamba shoots hard, fast and accurate...  :archer2:
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: turtle927 on September 16, 2010, 11:20:00 PM
E B A Y  got some good prices on these bows. in fact im looking right now. type in martin recurve they have one buy it now for 410.00.
                         good luck to you
                            jason
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: MikeM on September 18, 2010, 06:10:00 PM
Because I have a long draw (30")I would go with the longer Hunter over the Mamba
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: turtle927 on September 24, 2010, 08:15:00 AM
which one did u end up getting?im thinking about geting the mamba or the venom longbow!!!
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Rattus58 on October 22, 2010, 12:51:00 PM
I've had the Mamba, the Hunter, and just about every other martin bow out there. The ones that lasted were the warthog (I think it was... I donated to fund raiser) and then wound up with a Hatfield... Heavy and sweet.

The traditional bows all in my case blew up on me and who knows why (31" draw)but Martin is the greatest to work with in fixin things up.

I shoot only the longbows now and have the Viper as a go to bow now. The Venom should be just like it... pretty quick and very stable.

Much Aloha...  :cool:
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Bobaru on October 26, 2010, 09:30:00 AM
Which bow you would buy may depend on your draw length.  I wouldn't be to concerned about which bow shoots "harder hitting, faster" or anything like that.  At 40# draw or about, they will both have complete pass throughs with arrows.  The question for hunting then would be which bow would be smoother and easy to draw.  

I'm 6" 5" with a longer draw.  So, I bought the hunter.  It doesn't stack for me, which I like.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: MikeM on October 26, 2010, 09:40:00 AM
I have a 30" draw and would go with the hunter. Also it has been my experience that the weight marked on the bow is often lighter than the actual draw weight with Martins.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Achilles1 on December 03, 2011, 12:44:00 AM
(http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n578/achilles112/IMGP0003.jpg)

My Damon Howatt Hunter
LH 62" 50# @ 28"

Hard to put down.
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Rob DiStefano on December 06, 2011, 04:55:00 PM
IMAGE TOO DANG LARGE!!!

My Damon Howatt Hunter
LH 62" 50# @ 28"

Hard to put down. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Smithhammer on December 06, 2011, 05:23:00 PM
Love my Mamba, but as others have said,, your draw length might determine which you prefer. I draw 27."
Title: Re: First bow ever. Martin Mamba or Hunter.
Post by: Bernie B. on December 06, 2011, 08:07:00 PM
I haven't had a Mamba, but I sure love my Hunter.  I have a 30" draw, and the bow is smooth as silk.

Bernie Bjorklund

NC Iowa/jSW Wisconsin