Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: PastorSteveHill on July 12, 2007, 01:08:00 PM

Title: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 12, 2007, 01:08:00 PM
Hi guys. I am wondering why we don't shoot 4 blade heads for hunting? I am new to this traditional stuff and just curious. I did speak to the owner of "SLick Trick Broadheads" he said they work fine out of traditional gear? Blessings
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: xia_emperor on July 12, 2007, 01:11:00 PM
you can use what ever you like, there are many people that use two, three and four blade Broadheads. I like two blads since they are easy to sharpen.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: BobW on July 12, 2007, 01:14:00 PM
Its just like razors for shaving.  I know some who still use a single fixed blade and, I think, the marketing folks are somewhere up to 4 or 5.....

A well placed shot doesn't rely on blade count.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: longbowman on July 12, 2007, 01:22:00 PM
I've killed deer with 2,3,4 & 6 blade heads and they all died.  That being said, if they still made the old glue on Bear Razorhead it would be all that I would use.  Since they don't I shoot the 200 gr. Ace heads and get the same results as the others mentioned...the deer still die.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: nevada cody on July 12, 2007, 01:25:00 PM
some people do shoot 2 blade heads with bleader blades it then makes it a 4 blader it will in most cases penetrate better than a 3 blader a 3blader has to break a bone in 3 planes 2 blader only 1 plane and a 4 blader in 2 planes iff you push the heads through a piece off paper youl se what i mean i shoot only 2 blade heads because i know that a bad hit in bone is alot more likely to punch through in to the vitals  did some penetration testing on some deer with a friend we shoot both 3 blade and 2 blade heads in the shoulder blades the 2 blades went straight through and some times even through the shoulderblade on the other side to. the 3 blades did not they got stuck in first shoulderblade arrows used beman mfx 340 250 grains upp front total arrow weight ca 640 grains bw plv 62#@29 cheers cody
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: Woodduck on July 12, 2007, 01:47:00 PM
Buy some old Bear heads w/ bleeder blades if they match your field point weight.
They have worked for a long time, now.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: JoeK on July 12, 2007, 02:11:00 PM
If you are concerned about penetration, nothing comes close to two blades.  That's been proven many times.  Read the extensive research reports by Dr. Ashby on this site.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: Orion on July 12, 2007, 05:33:00 PM
I've been shooting 4-blade Zwickeys for more than 30 years.  Used them on everything from rabbits to bear and moose.  They work just fine. Lately I tend to use two blades when I'm hunting out of tree stands, because I think it's a little more likely to make it through a shoulder blade if I make a bad shot and shoot too far forward.
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 12, 2007, 08:12:00 PM
what do you all think of the slick tricks?
What about the trophy ridge bunker busters?
I think the Trophy ridge are 3 blade heads...
Title: Re: Why Not a 4 BLade Head?
Post by: Mr.Magoo on July 12, 2007, 09:20:00 PM
Heads like the "slick tricks" and "bunker busters" are geared toward compound shooters.  Not the best choices for recurves and longbows.