Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: OBIOU HUNTER on March 31, 2011, 07:59:00 PM

Title: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: OBIOU HUNTER on March 31, 2011, 07:59:00 PM
Hi,

I had 3 BW in the past and I loved their smoothness, but I sold them. Now I'd like to buy a new one but I also like the habu bows ( but I don't know how smooth they are )...

So could someone tell me more about Habu bows... Are they less or more smooth than the BW ?

Thanks

               Chris
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: L82HUNT on April 01, 2011, 10:47:00 AM
This is my take having shoot both.  

 The Habu with longbow limbs compared to a Widow PL.  The PL has more thump in your hand at release but it is also lighter.  The PL is faster by a few fps when I put a chrono side by side.

  The Widow PSA vs. Habu Curve.  I really believe these to bows are very close as far as feel.  Both are Smooth and I could tell zero differance, the bows where within 3 lbs.  Both bows you dont feel a thing when you release.  The Widow had more mass which I liked.  
  Everyone's differant but I feel most people who shoot a Widow and dont care for them wont like a Habu and vice versa.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: 1screagle on April 01, 2011, 02:56:00 PM
Good summary L82HUNT. The difference in price is hard to justify the Habu. Both very good bows. I had the best of all the Habu models and have had a few Black Widows. In the end it comes down to what you like. One of a kind or mass produced doesn't matter to some. High price and a 2 year wait for a Habu I hear. As far as more or less smooth, they are so close. If the bows were priced the same I would choose the Habu. At something around 2000.00 and a 2 year wait I would take the Black Widow, but that's just me. As a shooter or perception of smooth you couldn't make a wrong choice.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Friend on April 01, 2011, 03:14:00 PM
Have owned or own a PSA and a Vyperkahn w/triple carbon limbs. Have shot them side by side. To me personally, there are some very significant differences.

Bow designs can be quite personal. Do what you can to get your hands on a Habu to give it a qualified evaluation. Only then will you be fully satisfied with your decision.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: 1screagle on April 01, 2011, 06:27:00 PM
Can't fault that thinking Friend. Mine were not triple carbon limbs, on any of my Habu bows, just bamboo cores. Apples for apples to the Widows I owned.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: stevewills on April 01, 2011, 06:43:00 PM
if i wanted a bow that looked like a widow,id probaly buy the widow..
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: wtpops on April 01, 2011, 06:50:00 PM
X2 with Friend

I have not shot a Habu but one differance is see is 12 weeks for a BW and 3 years for a Habu, that is new of course not if you buy used, Now if i really wanted a Habu and was about 10 to 15 years younger i might just wait the 3 years.

I would like to try one my self just have not had the chance.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: McDave on April 01, 2011, 07:01:00 PM
I bought a used Habu Death Adder about a year ago, and didn't feel that it shot as well for me as a comparable Widow.  I sold the Habu after a few months, and got all my money back out of it.  One thing, people are curious enough about a Habu that they are fairly easy to re-sell.  People like me want to try them out, but don't want to fork over all the money or wait all that time for a new one.

Just because I didn't like it as much as my Widows doesn't mean anything.  As others have said, it's a very personal thing.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: LoneWolf73 on April 01, 2011, 07:18:00 PM
I have been shooting Habu Mamushi Recurve lately. They do not make them any more but in comparing it to a PTF or TF recurve the Habu is quieter and a little more consistant shooter "for me".
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Bowwild on April 01, 2011, 08:15:00 PM
I have never laid eyes on a Habu. I am on the 2-year waiting list though. I own a PSAIII that is 58" and 46#@26". I have exactly the same specs in a PAX, which is the one piece.  The PSAIII is a fine bow but I would buy the PAX three times before the PSAIII.  I love the graceful lines of the PAX. They don't shoot any different though.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: mparks on April 01, 2011, 08:18:00 PM
The grip is quite a bit different IMO with the Habu be more of a low-wrist style than the standard BW.  BW is has much more of a palm swell.  Limbs of the Habu are narrower.  I have a PSA and a Viperkhan hicurve.  Bought them both used for about the same $$$.  I've still not been able to decide which I like better.  Pretty fond of both!
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: 684Kevin on April 01, 2011, 08:39:00 PM
I have both Widows and and have had a HABU recurve and also a HABU with hybrid longbow limbs.  I really liked the HABU three piece longbow.  It was very smooth, no vibration and quiet.  Hard to compare to the Widow 3 piece bows since they don't have them with longbow limbs, but I prefer the feel and shot provided by the HABU longbow limbs any day over the recurve limbs.  Since then, I have discovered the Zipper's risers and grips on their 3 piece bows fit my shooting style better.  I have them with 62" & 64" longbow limbs and most likely will never go back to a 3 piece bow with a recurve limbs.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: overbo on April 01, 2011, 08:55:00 PM
I've owned 3 widows(MA's) and 6 habus.The vyperkahn w/ triple carbon longbow is very quick,stable,and quiet bow.It's 60'' and would think it's not as smooth drawing as a recurve widow of the same legnth.I also have a set of 60'' glass and boo hycurve limbs that are very smooth and enjoyable to shoot.I've had both the standard and Asbell grip on the widow and preferred the Asbell grip but prefer the habu's grip to the widows.
Is there that much difference to warrant the extra money for the habu?Not really
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: FBB on April 01, 2011, 09:54:00 PM
If you want a Blackwidow with something more than just the standard wood you have to go to the X series which runs $1,200.00 so we're talking about a diffrence of $600.00 compared to a Habu not that much in the over all scheme of things. I have one Widow and have purchased 2 Habu's since December but I bought used on all of them my days of paying top dollar for any bow are over plus I hate the wait no matter how long. I find that the Habu is quieter than the Widow and shoots better for me. At this point I will continue to look and buy used Habu's maybe because it's the $1,800.00 2 year wait mystique that makes me want these bows.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: FBB on April 01, 2011, 09:56:00 PM
BTW that deer I'm pictured with ( my biggest) was shot with a Widow.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: elksticker on April 01, 2011, 10:16:00 PM
I've only compared one B.W. to one "death adder". but I thought the B.W. was considerably faster. It was an early model so maybe he has improved them since.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Steelhead on April 01, 2011, 10:54:00 PM
I dont think you can compare the older Habus to the the newer Viper Khans with double and tripple carbon limbs and newer limb designs.The risers have changed as well and the grips have been modified.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: L. E. Carroll on April 02, 2011, 03:24:00 AM
I too really like bows with reversed mounted limbs... I have had 3 MA and PMA's and one really fancy "skinned" Death Adder.. I shot the MA's considerably better than the habu, but liked the weight of the Habu better, as the riser is lighter...

That said, I discovered Jack Kemp's Kwyk Styks  :eek:    :wavey:
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: habujohn on April 02, 2011, 12:18:00 PM
I enjoyed this thread, always intesting to see what other thoughts are on my brothers bows(habu).  After 40 plus years in archery things have not changed much, we all like what we like. I for one am glad that there is a variety to choose from.
habu john
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Sixby on April 02, 2011, 06:18:00 PM
If we are going to talk options the throw EagleWing Talon into the mix. As the Quik Styk is it is a static reverse mount./
God Bless you all, Steve
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Brock on April 02, 2011, 08:20:00 PM
Have shot BW MA II and MA III back in 90s....bought a second Habu recurve in 90s as well after not liking gray color of first and going for one similar in color to BW Autumn Oak.

I LOVE my Habu Chris built for me in '99...and glad it was recommended for me to try by Roger R. at a bear camp in Sask a while earlier.  Great bow, great quality, very forgiving, good cast and will plumb throw an arrow downrange.

The bows are very similar with not much difference I could tell in drawing bow and shooting but I know there are some bigger differences in design and tolerances as Chris is pretty anal about that stuff...or used to be.

They did feel different in hand but not sure what it was as both have substantial risers and mass.  I think the Habu might have been a little smoother nearing full draw....but thought they shot similar and both liked stiff heavy arrows.

I bought the Habu as I just liked it better after shooting for a while...it seemed like lighter draw weight but no way of proving it.

That being said....if you can find a nice Habu recurve from mid to late 90s....buy one!!!  If not then go with a Black Widow MA II/III used from same period....I think they are the best of both makers bows and while the newer models are nice...I think these represent the best of their past and current bows for looks, shootability, price and bang for the buck.

I cant justify nor offer a need for a Habu now with a 3 yr wait and the price Chris is requiring....a USED Habu or BW is the way I would go.  They show up every now and then...unless you want a newer model then the BW for sure because of wait and price.

keep em sharp,

ron herman
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Swamp Yankee on April 02, 2011, 08:41:00 PM
With a 3 year wait you might have to explain the cost of a Habu to more than your current wife!
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: maxwell on April 02, 2011, 08:52:00 PM
I have had both and still have the Habu Hycurve- I like the Habu more, just fits me better and shoots as well or better than the widow. As far as craftsmanship the Habu is flawless amazing how well limbs fit from one bow to another, also his bow quiver is an excellent design. Just my opinion.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: TaterHill Archer on April 02, 2011, 10:20:00 PM
I have had 2 BWs and 4 or 5 Habus.  I sold an old Habu take down that I wish I had back.  smoothest bow I've ever shot.  Comparing the new Habus to the BWs, I'd say the main difference (other than limb design) is the Habu is "prettier". They just look good.  Will they outperform the BW.  Nope.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Andy Cooper on April 02, 2011, 10:23:00 PM
I second Sixby's recommendation to add the Talon into the mix. I have both a Vyperkahn and a Talon. Even though the Talon is 15# heavier, I shoot it better than I shoot the Habu. Another advantage with the Talon that you can't get with Habu, and that costs extra with the Widows, is that Steve will build the grip to fit your hand...which is, to me, a huge deal. If I don't like the way a bow feels in my bow hand, I don't shoot it, and it winds up getting listed for sale.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: jonsimoneau on July 08, 2011, 03:20:00 PM
Some of these posts have surprised me a bit.  I have a 53lb. Habu recurve from the laters years of habu recurves...and a 57lb. Habu Vyperkhan with tripple carbon longbow limbs.  I just shot both of them side by side and I can tell you this.  The vyperkhan with longbow limbs is noticably smoother than the recurve!  It's higher poundage...and it's longbow limbs!.  Also...the Vyperkhan has less vibration after the shot...even though it is lighter in mass weight!  My favorite recurve is still the habu recurve...but the vyperkhan is even better.  Not only that...but I shoot both bows well.  But no matter how hard I try...I cannot shoot the recurve better than the vyperkhan.  Chris told me that this would be impossible...since the vyperkhan simply shoots better.  He said that if it did not shoot better...he would still be making the older recurve model.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Warden609 on July 08, 2011, 04:29:00 PM
I owned a Death Adder and a Viper Kahn. I really liked both of the bows but would say my favorite was the VK... The Widows I owned were great shooters but between the two (habu/widow) for me I would go with the Habu. Like to shoot one of those tripple carbon bows one day  :archer2:
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Bowwild on July 08, 2011, 06:05:00 PM
I'm comparing a Habu hycurve with triple carbon limbs these days to several bows including Widows. So far the Habu is top on my list to hunt this year. I'll know more in a couple days. To me the Habu is as different from my PSA, PCH, and PAX as my Silvertip and a Tall Tines.

I most love the Habu grip.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Lee Robinson . on July 08, 2011, 07:46:00 PM
In the late 90's-and early 200X's I owned several Habu bows. Awesome in terms of accuracy. His longbows back then had handshock, but his recurves were completely dead in the hand, had good speed, and most importantly in terms of stability and accuracy they were as good as any bow I ever shot. The ONLY complaints I personally had with his recurves were for ME they were heavy in the hand (a lot of mass with a bowquiver and coming off HH bows and Sentman bows, I was used to bows that were very light in the hand)...and they were a bit noisy. They were not loud, but they weren't quiet. But back to shootability. In that area, again flawless. I tried one of his vyperkahns and I can't say it worked for me as well. For this reason I liked his old bow design better. The bottom line though is Chris, IMO, is one of the best bowyers in the world. I think the money he is getting for a bow is insane, bt with a 3 year waiting list it OBVIOUSLY doesn't matter what I think. People want his bows for a reason.

BW is certainly a fine bow too.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Danny Rowan on July 08, 2011, 08:28:00 PM
I owned as BW PCHX, LOUD! could not get it quiet, sold it. I now have a Habu recurve I bought from Chris's brother John. Have not shot it yet so cannot compare, but I will in a day or two.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Friend on July 09, 2011, 10:19:00 AM
We all have our own personal preferances and personal needs. I definately have my own and this comparison will continue.

One factual difference is that if you desire a bow shorter than 60", then the Black Widow would be the choice. Habu does not make a shorter bow.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Danny Rowan on July 10, 2011, 06:38:00 PM
Got my Habu recurve in the mail a couple of days ago and shot it today. For me, it is a great bow, much quieter than the pchx I had very smooth on the draw and hits where I look with authority. It will not be going anywhere anytime soon.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Festivus on July 11, 2011, 04:29:00 AM
Is Habu a sponsor here?

They sure seem to be getting a lot of free press and advertisement over the years.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Recurve Amigo on June 03, 2015, 10:56:00 PM
I can usually pick up a bow and shoot it. I have 4 widows, 2 recurves and 2 longbows. I can pick up any of those bows put a cant and shoot instinctively. Most bows I can do that but the carbon limb habu didn't shoot like that for me. It was very fast buy it's grip is not conducive to my shooting style. That day I shot all brands
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Recurve Amigo on June 03, 2015, 10:57:00 PM
I can usually pick up a bow and shoot it. I have 4 widows, 2 recurves and 2 longbows. I can pick up any of those bows put a cant and shoot instinctively. Most bows I can do that but the carbon limb habu didn't shoot like that for me. It was very fast buy it's grip is not conducive to my shooting style. That day I shot a lot of brands
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: overbo on June 04, 2015, 05:01:00 PM
My Vyperkahn is now 6 years old. The last 5 of those 6 years, I've been shooting and hunting w/ other makers, Silvertip, Zipper, Tall Tines, and Stalker. Every so often I'll shoot that Habu and it still amazes me. IMO, It's an extremely well designed and built bow.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Sixby on June 06, 2015, 01:45:00 AM
I had a ViperKahn here to skin. It had one of the most comfortable grips I have ever felt. Except for an EagleWing. LOL. sorry Just had to say that.
Seriously though the grip on the bow is simply great. Credit goes to whom it is due.

God bless, Steve
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: pamike on June 06, 2015, 09:15:00 PM
there is really no comparison from BW to habu.  The BW is a good bow, but much more vibration and noise.  i have tried numerous BW and they are just not a habu vyperkahn.  The grip is incredible and the bow is so repeatable - i have had them all and all i can say it try one if you can find one!

I must also add that if you want something that compares to the vyperkahn (and one that you can get a lot faster) talk to steve about a talon.  excellent grips and great shooting bows - Talon!  i have an awesome talon and i cannot tell you how much i wish it was a little lighter in weight.  Love the bow but just can pull it any more.

mike
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: trasher on June 08, 2015, 09:50:00 AM
I would not interfere but have you ever thought about a Timber Ghost static recurve or hybrid longbow?
I've never shot a Habu but some Black Widows and yes there are quite good!
But if I would  prefer the Black Widow for hunting and looking around for something new
which gives you the smoothness drawing, consistency and quietness of the widow, I would choose
a "Thimberghost Bow" because he includes all positive features of the widow but he is much faster and quieter and ablolutly no handshock.
The timberghost static recurve is the quietest recurve i'v ever shot.
Also I think the design is outstanding and much better, but this is only my fact.

Check out the review     http://tradgang.com/noncgi/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=143641;p=2    
There are more reviws at Tradgang just search!
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: JohnV on June 09, 2015, 12:06:00 PM
"Is Habu a sponsor here? They sure seem to be getting a lot of free press and advertisement over the years."

Last time I checked Bear Archery was not a sponsor on this website either.  How much free press and advertisement have they received over the years?  Are we only permitted to talk about those products manufactured by sponsors of this website?
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: Brock on June 09, 2015, 12:13:00 PM
I shot my first Habu in 1997 after getting that recommendation from Roger Rothhaar....he shot BW but I asked him what he would shoot if BW did not give him that bow.  he told me HABU!

I ordered a new one in 1999....and never looked back.  It is steady and smooth.  I dont shoot it much anymore but it is a great recurve.  He does not make the Bushmaster model any longer if I am correct...but I feel it was his best all around bow even compared to current models.  Just my opinion.  Great bow if you can handle the wait and price...
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: danbow on June 09, 2015, 01:09:00 PM
I can't handle either so I will stick with my BW.
Title: Re: Habu Vs Black Widow
Post by: trasher on June 11, 2015, 05:56:00 AM
Brock wrote:

  I shot my first Habu in 1997 after getting that recommendation from Roger Rothhaar....he shot BW but I asked him what he would shoot if BW did not give him that bow. he told me HABU!  

Yes, that true.
It was the time he didn't notice the timberghost.

sorry, just kidding..
 
cu
Andy