I would like to have your opinions about how they compare with the recurve limbs.
I believe the A is a 14" riser and the B is a 16" riser.I have had and shot both A & B riser Shawnee bows,they both shot fine.I feel the longer riser gave me a better sight window with it's longer length.It's more of a personal preference,do you want a longer sight window or would like a shorter bow.
Well actually I have a Shawnee 58" A riser with C limbs for a 29" DL;I was thinking that maybe more mass on the riser was a tad better.I like the way it feels,just to find out some different feelings.
I agree with your thoughts on the B riser. I like the A for it's compactness but it is not my preference. Experience has taught me that I shoot better with the larger sight window and a little more mass. For me the B Cheyenne riser is about perfect. Wish I had one now :banghead:
I'll 3rd the larger site window... I loose concentration if there is something between me and the target visually.
I'm now shooting the longbow carbon/foam limbs (D)on the Cheyenne B riser...makes for a long(er) bow than the D recurve limbs, but already it just feels "right".
I did like the B riser alittle more then the shorter A riser.It may have alittle more mass weight being longer but it wasn't enough to feel.I guess it would also depend on riser material for a heavier riser.
I have had a few A and B Shawnee and Cheyenne risers.If I personally was gonna have one or the other I would get the B riser.For the reasons sighted above.
It will have a little more mass weight and allow you to bave a longer bow if you prefer that paired with the D limbs.If you wanna go shorter you can always get the C limbs.
I had an A sized all phenolic riser that added some mass and weighed about the same as an all wood B riser if you wanted some extra heft in the A sized riser.That was a solid riser that I really liked.
If you like a more compact riser with a tad less mass weight the A riser is the way to go.Paired with a bowquiver you are gonna have a solid feeling bow.
For sure go with the B riser, i once bought the A riser and couldn't even see the target unless i canted the bow a lot which i prefer not to.
I know Bob loves the A riser so its just a matter of your shooting style i guess.
Wow, different strokes! I prefer the A riser, and have no problem seeing the target.
I have shot all three and prefer a C riser my self.Bob's B risers seem to be like everyone else's A risers.There seems to be a current trend now towards smaller sight windows.I myself don't care for a short sight window at all.
TTT
I have ILF risers but I like the 18" riser. The limbs are smoother on it. I also have a 20" and that is a nice riser but is heavy. But it is great for indoor target. My 16 is better with E or longer limbs. I haven't even tried my new D recurve limbs on the 16, they shoot so well off a 18". The recurve limbs are probably the fastest limbs I have of any brand.
Not to drag this post off in the bushes, but I've got a 60" Cheyenne & Shawnee. Both are A riser/ D limbs. The shorter site window doesn't bother me at all, because I cant. I might like additional mass, but outside that would there be any significant performance diffences in a 60" B-riser bow of identical poundage?
Have a Cheyenne with B riser/B oldstyle limbs for a 58" bow. Very nice bow and very fast but a little short for my draw length. Have come close to selling the bow on several occasions but it's a looker so still have it. The B riser does make a nice compromise for changing limbs, though. Have tried C and D limbs as well, the B riser is simply a very 'versatile' size.
I like small risers....so I favor the A.....and the sweetest shooting limbs to me are the Ds
I currently have a Shawnee with E longbow limbs -- 62 inches. I prefer shorter risers regardless of the builder, but I think Bob's Shawnee riser is just about perfect. Excellent combination of size (small) and mass (plenty IMO). I do cant slightly when I shoot so sight window size is not an issue for me. For those who shoot with the bow vertically, the longer riser with its longer sight window would probably work better.