Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: 59Alaskan on April 20, 2010, 07:31:00 PM

Title: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: 59Alaskan on April 20, 2010, 07:31:00 PM
Hello,
Seeking out opinions from folks who have shot 1970's models of both a Browning Nomad Stalker (or other 52" Browning model) and a Kodiak Magnum as to which is the better shooting bow.  
Thank you!
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: BBK41ND on April 20, 2010, 07:51:00 PM
Hi,I took this years turkey with my 1965 Kodiak Magnum and it shoots like a dream for such a short AMO.Love it!
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: Killdeer on April 20, 2010, 07:58:00 PM
Having shot the Cobra 1 and K-Mags, I found the Browning to be a tad more sluggish. The wide limbs just didn't have the snap of the Bear bows.

That being said, I have not shot the Nomad Stalker, and the Cobra 1 was 50".
Killdeer
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: JRY309 on April 20, 2010, 07:59:00 PM
I have had both bows and think they are both fine shooting bows.I think the old Brownings are an underated bow,maybe not as popular as a Bear K-Mag.I also bought me nephew a Browning Wasp 34#@28 when he was 12 years old.I don't know what his draw length was or the arrow weight,but it shot some 5/16" POC through a chrony at 135 fps. I thought that was pretty fast for a young guy and the bow is a sweet shooting bow.A couple of years later I picked him up a Browning Nomad Stalker 45#@28.I like both the older Bears and Browning's.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: koger on April 20, 2010, 09:41:00 PM
I had both at the same time 2 years ago, same poundage. Bears are more popular, but the Browning I had was much smoother, did not stack, and was a hhhaaammmer! Both of my bows were #55, and the bear stacked badly last 2 inches of draw. I could shoot the Browing with 3 under and do well. Just my 2 cents worth.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: arrowslinger22 on April 20, 2010, 10:14:00 PM
I've had both as well.  Sold the Browning's and still have the Bears.  I love the kmag grip and at my 27" draw, no stacking.  When it comes to vintage 52" bows, I like the Bears and Wing Hunters.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: 59Alaskan on April 21, 2010, 06:19:00 AM
Thank you for the feedback.  It's all good and interesting information.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: 4runr on April 21, 2010, 06:38:00 AM
Excuse me ,Sir, does your wife know you're straying???


Just asking!!
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: Hatrick on April 21, 2010, 07:15:00 AM
Better yet, get yourself a 1960's or early 1970's 54" Howatt Hi Speed.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: carlo1404 on April 21, 2010, 10:08:00 AM
I have a Magnum 52" and sold time ago one S-Mag 48" from my little Bear bows collection .... I know  that Bear make his model without Draw Limits and for my 30" draw this is very important. A friend of mine have one 52" Browning bow and IMHO I don't change my Magnum with another 52" bow.
Bye from Italy
Carlo
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: mnbwhtr on April 21, 2010, 12:26:00 PM
What Koger said browning was much smoother no stack
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: mahantango on April 21, 2010, 04:59:00 PM
Second the 54" Hi-Speed.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: 59Alaskan on April 21, 2010, 07:44:00 PM
Kenny, I think anyone even remotely connected with contaminating our house of Bear will have to face serious consequences.  It may be worth it to me to do just that one day.  It would have to be one fine bow though.
Title: Re: Browning vs. Bear Short bow
Post by: bigbadjon on April 21, 2010, 09:16:00 PM
I have a specimen of both from the 70's. The Browning Nomad is no doubt smoother. The Bear K Mag is faster and has a more comfortable, less bulky grip but isn't as sweet shooting. Both are good bows though.