Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Soilarch on March 31, 2010, 10:19:00 PM

Title: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Soilarch on March 31, 2010, 10:19:00 PM
Knife guys like to debate bevel (what we call double bevel), chisel (what we call single bevel) and a convex edge.

I don't want a debate, just want to know if anybody has tried a convex on their BHs?
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: StanM on March 31, 2010, 11:31:00 PM
Just to clarify for me, when you say convex do you mean the bevel is rounded out, like the opposite of a hollow grind?  I guess like an axe would be a good way to describe it.

I do not do this, I'm a single beveler.  Interested to hear what others have to say.
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: FerretWYO on March 31, 2010, 11:40:00 PM
Silver Flames are I believe.
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Soilarch on March 31, 2010, 11:51:00 PM
Yes, like a very very acute angled axe.

I'm getting setup to sharpen the very expensive hairdresser scissors with that have a "convex" edge.

They can be done and maintained by sandpaper laid on top of a mousepad.  (I used that for a long time on knives)
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Ragnarok Forge on April 01, 2010, 12:05:00 AM
I haven't done it. I gave it some serious thought and figured it would actually decrease penetration.  It works great on an axe or sword since it helps part what you are cutting into.  With a broadhead the tissue you being cut is moving along the edge instead of perpendicular to it. I don't think that kind of edge would be as effective as a razor sharp double bevel or single bevel edge
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Soilarch on April 01, 2010, 12:17:00 AM
EDIT:  Dag-nabbit.  I didn't want a debate and here I am being the first to turn it into one...   "[dntthnk]"

It would be every bit as sharp as any other BH.

Convexs are used in Japanese swords...and are very popular in knife cutting competitions. (Apparently we can turn anything into a competition.)  


That's what got my curiosity rolling.
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Old York on April 01, 2010, 12:29:00 AM
Do you folks mean a  compound  bevel?
  :confused:


(Like on an iron plane)
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: fido dog on April 01, 2010, 12:43:00 AM
My hair shears are damn near $400 (yes I can cut hair also). I sure would be interested in the sharpening process to save me 35 bucks...LOL!

I'm sure with a super fine edge that they would slice right through tissue and bone just fine. Maybe even hold that edge just a bit more? You may be on to something here.
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Soilarch on April 01, 2010, 12:48:00 AM
No, not really.  (Glad someone else likes the old hand planes though!)

Here's is what we typically put on a single bevel BH     (http://easiercutting.com/images/ff68_1_sbl.JPG)

Here's what I'm wondering about
    (http://easiercutting.com/images/b98c_1_sbl.JPG)


....$35!!!     :scared:
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: tippit on April 01, 2010, 07:38:00 AM
A couple reasons for the convex edge on a knife, is to taper the bevel away from the edge so when re-sharpening all you are sharpening is the very edge.  Thus quicker and easier to re-sharpen.  It will cut easier without all drag/resistance of having to pull a wedged edge.

They are more difficult to do in that you have to grind and round the back of the edge away from the final edge...but you end up with a very fine edge.

Most broadheads have very thin steel to begin with thus the convex/taper would be very minimal and weaker IMO.  Also they tend to be tempered softer than a knife. Being softer they are easier to sharpen (remove steel) but they will have more tendency for the edge to roll.  Remember they only need to cut once as apposed to a knife that you want an edge to hold as long as possible.

For me anyway, it wouldn't be worth the extra effort to grind a convex edge which would reduce the strength of a softer edge.  That is unless you actually made the broadhead harder more like a knife (Silver Flames for one).  I will do that on my own forged broadheads.  JMHO...tippit

Convex single bevel edge on my forged broadhead that is tempered harder than most commercial broadbroads.  

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v110/tippit/Broadheads/TeamTippitBroadheads0312.jpg)

Woody Blackwell's convex edge...by design of the maker & the material having to be rounded  :)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v110/tippit/Broadheads/WoodysLesson2.jpg)
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Soilarch on April 02, 2010, 10:12:00 PM
tippit, I agree with the points you've brought up.  I had planned to play with Grizzlys to begin with, since they are what I have on hand.  Instead of doing the Ashby proscribed 25*  I thought I'd try more along the lines of 30* to compensate for less material directly behind the edge.

I know Ashby didn't arrive at 25* by accident, but I cant help wondering if reducing the CUTTING edge angle (to 25*) is more, or less, important than increasing the "back angle" to 155* where the bevel ends.  We know 30* can be just as sharp...and by going convex, we don't give up any strength, in essence remove that 155* angle that I'm sure eats up some of your KE/Momentum.

Needless to say, I'm going to have to try it if I buy the machine.
Title: Re: Anybody put a Convex bevel on their BHs?
Post by: Butch Speer on April 03, 2010, 08:55:00 AM
One of my hobbies is wood carving. All gouges are single bevel. Some very good tools have a very slight compound angle edge. These tools cut as good as those without the compound bevel but, are much stronger. These tools are tempered 60-60 Rockwell Y are sharper than any tool you can imagine. The second bevel really strengthens the edge without compromising it's sharpness & makes for a very strong edge. It's also a lot easier to do than a convex cause it doesn't need any tools more than you already have. Not saying anything bad about the convex. JMO