Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Buckwheaties on March 16, 2010, 06:59:00 PM

Title: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Buckwheaties on March 16, 2010, 06:59:00 PM
By Stu's calculator I want to use the Vapor 3000's BUT Gold Tip bought them out and I can't find the equivalent. Can anyone recommend a shaft, maybe even a better one at a 300 spine around 8gr/"?
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Cherokee Scout on March 16, 2010, 07:23:00 PM
Try Big Jim's 229-344-1616
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: JRY309 on March 16, 2010, 07:41:00 PM
The old Blackhawk Vapor 3000 has a spine of .400 which is equal to a GT 55/75.The equal in the new GT Vapor's is the Vapor 400.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Guru on March 16, 2010, 07:43:00 PM
Yes, What john said...the 3000 are .400
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Richie Nell on March 16, 2010, 10:15:00 PM
GT Ultralight 300 is .300" deflection and 8.5gr./in.

I use these for my 71@31 Widow and get 34.0% FOC.


Love the GT Ultralight line of arrows.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: mark land on March 17, 2010, 10:34:00 AM
I shot the Carbonwood 3000's for a few years before switching to the Beman MFX shaft but what I found is the 3000 spine was in between the GT 55/75 and 35/55, slightly weaker then a 55/75 and just a little stiffer then a 35/55 almost like right in between those 2.  I bareshaft all my arrows and could shoot the 3000's at 29in with a 100gr insert and 125gr tip.  With a GT 55/75 I had to shoot them at least 30-31in with same tip weight and the 35/55 at 28in were too weak for my bow.  My spine tested shows the same difference as well.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Robert Honaker on March 17, 2010, 10:42:00 AM
I found the BH 3000's weaker than GT 55/75 also. Much weaker even though they are both supposed to be .400 deflection.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: lt-m-grow on March 17, 2010, 05:32:00 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by Robert Honaker:
I found the BH 3000's weaker than GT 55/75 also. Much weaker even though they are both supposed to be .400 deflection.
that makes sense as the old carbonwood 4000s are close in spine to the GT 55/75
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: LostNation_Larry on March 17, 2010, 09:30:00 PM
I still have one dozen of the Vapor Carbonwoods in 3000 and I've been getting $45 per dozen, nocks and inserts included.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: kadbow on March 17, 2010, 11:27:00 PM
Vapor Carbonwood 3000 says 45/60 spine right on it.
Title: Re: BH Vapor 3000?
Post by: Jimscol on March 17, 2010, 11:47:00 PM
Larry:  If you still have those shafts I will buy them. Jim