Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: treestandbutt on February 24, 2010, 05:02:00 PM

Title: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: treestandbutt on February 24, 2010, 05:02:00 PM
Looking to buy some ASAT wool and looking for experiences of both. The First Lite looks like it is significanlty lighter wool (14oz or so), while the Day One is reportadly 24oz. If I bought the Day One, it would be with the windstopper lining, something I don't think First Lite comes with.

I have owned a set of Gray Wolf for years and love it, just want some ASAT wool.

Thanks.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: GMMAT on February 24, 2010, 05:39:00 PM
The ASAT first lite is pretty light.  I have the vest (so far), and I plan to add a few more items, this year.

Not familiar with the other brand.  Are you familiar with Filson vests?  I have the mackinaw wool vests....and they're WAY heavier than the first lite.

I hope this helps....."some".  I was actually really surprised how lite the ASAT wool was/is.  Not that it's a bad thing.....just surprised.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Bonecracker on February 24, 2010, 05:49:00 PM
Do not mean to highjack this thread but  where can you purchase the ASAT First Light?
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: GMMAT on February 24, 2010, 05:56:00 PM
ASAT's site.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Oregon Okie on February 24, 2010, 06:51:00 PM
I don't have but have looked at the First Lite stuff. The base layers are very light but it's merino so it should be a little warm. The pants are super lite and definately don't have a wool feel to them. They seem like good pants but are more the weight of a pure rip stop type nylon pant. Don't know how they would be after washing if they would soften up or what. Pretty cool product but i would say very different than what I think of as a traditional wool pant. Don't know about the jacket / vest / camp shirt style.
Just adding my 2 cents.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: stickhorse on February 24, 2010, 07:07:00 PM
I have the first Lite and Day one. the first lite is as rip stop type nylon. the shirt is a little thicker.  even on warm days in colo. 50-70 deg. would need a little extra under them. Day one is much thicker and i wear them with nothing else extra.    Bonecracker-www.Firstlitewool.com
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: pitbull on February 24, 2010, 07:18:00 PM
I own both and have used them extensively for hunting. The first lite is fine on its own above 60 degrees as it is light weight. When it gets colder I layer under it or use it as a base layer. The day one for me is below 50 degree and I don't layer under it until it gets sub 40. Both are very good gear.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: joe skipp on February 24, 2010, 07:20:00 PM
Day One is quality. Not cheap but their ASAT Wool is some fine stuff.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Hackbow on February 24, 2010, 07:55:00 PM
Just went to both Day One and Firstlite sites. ASAT stuff looked to be exactly same stuff as far as construction goes. Prices nearly the same.

Edited: Like a dunce I went to First Lite's and ASAT's sites. They were promoting the same pieces. Day One's stuff is heavier....like everyone else stated.  :knothead:
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on February 24, 2010, 08:34:00 PM
I also have both.
The First Lite Chama is a very comfortable warm layering garmet in cold weather. Also, pretty good stand alone in temps in the high 40's and up. I wore my Chama on a colorado deer hunt in 09 for 9 straight days (next to my skin). I stunk pretty bad, but the shirt did not! The shirt dries fairly quickly. Wicks moisture very well, and when it is damp, I stay warm. No cool clamy feeling.
I also have the Day One ASAT wool pants with wind liner. These are heavy, stand alone pants.
I only wear these when temps drop into the teens and below. I have the pants with the high waist. Incredibly warm, and surprising, not too bulky. Great pants for treestand hunting. I personally would not wear them on a mountian or backpack type hunt. Just too bulky to pack for that. (unless the hunt area was going to be very cold). For a backpack hunt/mountian hunt I would look closely at the First Lite Gila pants.

chris <><
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Nate Fikkert on February 24, 2010, 09:19:00 PM
I am looking pretty hard at trying some of the firstlite stuff as a baselayer or by itself for elk hunting this fall.  Seems ideal, plus I like the potential of less "stink" from the natural fibers than some of the synthetics.  Pricey, but I am pretty sure it will last a long time.  Would you guys who have experience with it go with the Llano or the Chama for september in the mountains.  I really like the zip-T style of the Chama, but it is a bit heavier weight.  Any thoughts?

Nathan
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on February 24, 2010, 09:37:00 PM
Nathan,
As I said above I have the Chama. You would be surprised on how thin this shirt is.
I personally think it would be perfect for elk hunting. If the temp gets a little warm, you can unzip to vent and/or push the sleeves up. I have worn my Chama in mid 60 degree weather comfortably.
I have worn some of the synthetics with there "anti-stink" they do not compare to merino wool.
Give the owners of First Lite a call, (I think his name is Kenton), I have called him a number of times, and he is knowledgeable on his product along with competitors. He is a great guy, who is willing to answer any question you would have.
He can be hard to reach, however, everytime I have left a message he has called me back within a few days.
 

chris <><
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Nate Fikkert on February 25, 2010, 06:49:00 AM
Chris,

Thanks, that is the info I needed. I will see what the company thinks.  I agree, the stank of synthetics can be unbearable after a few days.  

Nathan
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: treestandbutt on February 25, 2010, 10:11:00 AM
Would the First Lite be comperable to Sitka gear?
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: kadbow on February 25, 2010, 10:14:00 AM
I think you are looking at apples and oranges.  The firstlite is "lite" for base layers or maybe a mid layer.  The Day One, which I have is a heavy wool like Grey Wolf.  I have the unlined Day One pants and jacket and like them a lot.  They are pretty versatile for a good range of temps with the appropriate layering.  I also agree that wool makes a great base layer that minimizes stink.    (http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b229/kadbow/IMG_0780.jpg)
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: PSUBowhunter on February 25, 2010, 10:49:00 AM
I have two different items from firstlite and love them both. I have the Llano, which is a base layer. I used this shirt last year on a 7 day mule deer hunt and it worked great. I wore it for 7 days straight and the shirt never began to smell at all. Since I had such good luck with the base layer,I bought the next shirt up(1/4 zip, cant remember the name) and its seems awesome as well. I would own everything they make if it wasnt so expensive.

I have never owned the Day One, but it looks like good stuff.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: BrianH on February 25, 2010, 01:55:00 PM
I just got one of First Lite button down shirts at Scheels on clearance.  Regular $169 for 49.99, what a steal.  They had some other base layer shirts, I might go back and stock up.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on February 25, 2010, 09:57:00 PM
WOW! Brian that is a smoking deal!
I would go back and stock up! Wish I lived near Moorhead!!

chris <><
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: beachbowhunter on February 26, 2010, 06:02:00 PM
FirstLite base layer is phenominal...equal or better than SitkaGear.  Day one shirt and pants - also great but a little thin and for me, too big.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: BrianH on February 26, 2010, 08:21:00 PM
Chris,  You read my mind.  I went back yesterday and bought the light shirt with zip down collar for $39.  Oh, and I also got the vest for $39 also.  I almost feel guilty about it, naw.  I only wish they would have had some pants.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on February 26, 2010, 08:32:00 PM
Good for you Brian. I am sure you will enjoy it all!
I actually found out the number to the store in Fargo, and ordered the vest, 1/4 zip and full zip sweater. I got them all with shipping for $130!! Retail price would have been around $400!!

chris <><
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Jimscol on February 26, 2010, 09:38:00 PM
I have the same Day One wool that Mark (Kadbow) has.  I don't wear it in Colorado much but I really like it for November whitetails in the Midwest. Jim

 (http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd313/jimscol/hunting/ksdeer6cweb.jpg)
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Steve O on February 26, 2010, 09:40:00 PM
Man, that picture says it all   :campfire:
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: BrianH on February 26, 2010, 10:05:00 PM
Chris,  Thats awesome.  Good thinking, hope you enjoy them.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on February 27, 2010, 09:28:00 AM
Great Pic Jim!
I have the same Dayone coat and pants. Great stuff!

chris <><
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Nate Fikkert on February 27, 2010, 10:09:00 AM
I just called Fargo this morning and they are all out.  A day late again.

Nathan
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: sinistral on February 27, 2010, 10:16:00 AM
Wool is the the way to go, but firstlite is lite. You will need to layer with them. They also have no wind stop ability. They would be great for warmer climes etc., and lower elevations.
Title: Re: First Lite Wool vs. Day One Wool
Post by: Onions on March 01, 2010, 07:19:00 AM
Nathan,
Did you try any of the other Scheel's?
I think the store in Iowa City carried the First Lite stuff.

chris <><