Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: bigcountry on August 19, 2009, 11:37:00 AM

Title: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: bigcountry on August 19, 2009, 11:37:00 AM
Do you guys think 2" really make a difference?  I shoot 29" and I have had 3 60" bows and I could shoot them just fine, but my mechanics had to be perfect.  I was usually great first 5 shots.  I had a tendency to pluck the string, (maybe because of string angle) my grip had to be just right or the bottom limb would kick up or movement after the shot cause the shelf to hit the arrow and appear stiff.

But I have also had a bunch of 62-64" recurves, not had much of an issue.  Its just so hard for me to believe that 2-4" makes that much of a difference.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Rick Perry on August 19, 2009, 11:49:00 AM
I dont think so either ......... however longer bows do FEEL smoother.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: jcar315 on August 19, 2009, 11:50:00 AM
I seem to shoot the 62" better too.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: jonsimoneau on August 19, 2009, 12:10:00 PM
I prefer longer recurves.  I don't really know why though.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: LimbLover on August 19, 2009, 01:07:00 PM
If you have a 30" draw it makes a huge difference in string pinch.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Jeremy on August 19, 2009, 01:10:00 PM
I have an honest 30" draw.  60" is the bare minumum I can shoot comfortably.  I prefer 62-64" bows.  The finger pinch on the shorter bows leads to me inconsistently short drawing by either not coming to anchor or bending my bow arm.

2-4" makes a big difference to me.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: joevan125 on August 19, 2009, 01:13:00 PM
I have a 30in draw and i can shoot a 60in bow ok but my 62-64in bows are a lot smoother to me.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Straitshot on August 19, 2009, 01:15:00 PM
I have had both and used to think the 60" was the optimum bow for a 28" draw. In recent years I have changed my mind to the 62". Still like both but prefer the 62".
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: BobW on August 19, 2009, 01:17:00 PM
You mean I can use the length of the bow as an excuse???????   :banghead:
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: LimbLover on August 19, 2009, 02:00:00 PM
I wish more bowyers made a 64".
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: wtpops on August 19, 2009, 02:10:00 PM
i know it makes a differance with me
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Three Arrows on August 19, 2009, 02:17:00 PM
I am of the opinion that the bare minimum for 30 inch draws on recurves should be 60 inches and 64 to 66 as ideal for both longbows and recurves with that draw length.  I personally prefer 62 inches on recurves and 64 inches on longbows.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: CaptJack on August 19, 2009, 05:59:00 PM
what Bob Lee has been teaching us since he started Wing Archery in the early 60s

(http://i29.tinypic.com/mj1gy8.jpg)

I have a 30½" draw and only shoot 64" bows
I hate a bow that's too short and stacks
a bow that's too short and stacks is like high water pants
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: George D. Stout on August 19, 2009, 06:10:00 PM
I think you answered your own question 8^).
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: CaptJack on August 19, 2009, 06:19:00 PM
there's an old standard about stacking and string pinch
once the string reaches 90° to the limb at draw, anything after that will cause stacking and string pinch

have someone take a photo of you at full draw from the side and look at the angle of the string to the limbs
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Killdeer on August 19, 2009, 06:31:00 PM
It is easier to find a parking space with the 60" one.

Killdeer
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: vtmtnman on August 19, 2009, 07:55:00 PM
I draw 28" and prefer a 60".I can shoot a 58 good but the 60 just feels better.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: bigcountry on August 20, 2009, 11:06:00 AM
Ok, I guess I should think about 64".  I have had a few 60" bows, and all required a high amount of concentration to shoot.  

One was a dream bow a 58" PSR, another a 60" zipper extreme.  Bill Dunn warned me that 60" extreme was too much for my draw. He was right. He said it would be like a 31" draw on std riser bow.  

I also shoot a 60" std zipper great. But its 61lbs, and I bet I am not getting to my full draw as I will a 48lb bow.  Litterly no problems.   Just hard to believe 2" makes that much a difference.  But it does.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: DesertDude on August 20, 2009, 11:46:00 AM
Hey Big,  I started with a 66" recurve about 20+ years ago. The only place you get into any trouble with it is in some blinds...I draw 29.5 and find I shoot my 64" & 66" bows the best.  I really love shooting my 66" curve.....
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Snowdog on August 20, 2009, 11:23:00 PM
On a 60" bow I pull with 3 fingers and hold with two. Easier on the finger pinch but takes a while to get used to.

I pull 29.5 and 62" is what works for amin. for me for comfort. I have shot upto a 66" and that was smooth as silk.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Tom on August 21, 2009, 05:53:00 AM
29" draw and 62" bows work best for me also. Have one 60" curve but we are still in the getting acquainted stage.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: buckeye_hunter on August 21, 2009, 07:39:00 AM
I wanted to get my new recurve in 64 inches, but the bowyer recommended 62 for my 29 inch draw length.

Don't know why bowyers are recommending a 62 vs 64in recurve for a 29 inch draw. Olympic archers use longer recurves than that.

Oh well, I ordered mine at 62 so it is a done deal. I wouldn't have even thought to order it at 60 inches. Just wouldn't have been comfortable at 29in draw for me personally.

-Charlie
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Don Stokes on August 21, 2009, 11:28:00 AM
Dan Quillian sold only one bow shorter than 62" that I am aware of, and it was a 60" youth/ladies longbow designed for a 26" draw. I have the prototype. His long-draw longbow, the Gull, was 72". For his 62" TD recurve, he offered a longer riser that made it 66". He believed that short bows are just too critical for most folks, unless you have a short draw to match. My draw is 28", and I haven't found a recurve under 58" that I could shoot worth a flip. Just can't make 'em work for me. I had a 60" Grizzly that I could shoot well, but my current recurves are all 62".
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: bigcountry on August 21, 2009, 12:17:00 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by buckeye_hunter:
I wanted to get my new recurve in 64 inches, but the bowyer recommended 62 for my 29 inch draw length.

Don't know why bowyers are recommending a 62 vs 64in recurve for a 29 inch draw. Olympic archers use longer recurves than that.

Oh well, I ordered mine at 62 so it is a done deal. I wouldn't have even thought to order it at 60 inches. Just wouldn't have been comfortable at 29in draw for me personally.

-Charlie
That is rather odd.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: Rick Perry on August 21, 2009, 12:56:00 PM
I draw an honest 31".......... I shoot 60" recurves with no issues  .......... I do shoot 2 fingers under tho 8^)
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: BobW on August 21, 2009, 03:15:00 PM
I draw an honest 32", and have bows of 68" (LB), 64" (LB), 62" (RC) and 56" (LB).  Shoot 3-under, so that reduces/rules out finger pinch.  It is all dependent on the bow geometry if the bow can handle the draw.  I will say that I'm a heck of a lot better with longer length bows.  Favorite right now is 64".  Maight be mass, or the length, or both..... The short bow is an outstanding performer, but man do you have to be on your game...

I really think a short recurve and a long draw is an accident waiting to happen.  The liklihood of getting to perpendicular with the string and the tip is really possible.  I think that is why I folded (blew up) a Red Wing a few years ago at full draw.
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: buckeye_hunter on August 21, 2009, 07:55:00 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by BobW:
The short bow is an outstanding performer, but man do you have to be on your game...


I really think a short recurve and a long draw is an accident waiting to happen.  The liklihood of getting to perpendicular with the string and the tip is really possible.  I think that is why I folded (blew up) a Red Wing a few years ago at full draw. [/QB]
Couldn't agree more about the short bow. As far as the second part of your quote  :scared:
Title: Re: 60" recurve vs. 62" recurve
Post by: elbow on August 21, 2009, 08:35:00 PM
I must tell ya, I shoot a 60" Jaguar [elburg] and I also have a 64". Both shoot well at my 31" draw, maybe it is in way the bow is built.