Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Lost Arra on May 25, 2009, 02:20:00 PM

Title: comparable carbons
Post by: Lost Arra on May 25, 2009, 02:20:00 PM
What Easton arrow is comparable in spine to the CE Heritage 90-150-250?

If I can't shoot like the Koreans I might as well shoot American arrows.
Title: Re: comparable carbons
Post by: amar911 on May 25, 2009, 02:23:00 PM
I think you shoot pretty darn well Bob! How about an AD Lite that is made one state away in Kansas?

Allan
Title: Re: comparable carbons
Post by: Lost Arra on May 25, 2009, 02:36:00 PM
After our discussion about shooting a hodge podge of arrows I decided to get a dozen that actually match.

I'll look into the AD shafts. Aren't they similar in designation to the ce heritage shafts?
Title: Re: comparable carbons
Post by: JRY309 on May 25, 2009, 03:16:00 PM
Well a CE 90 has a .531 spine so a close Easton/Beman would be a 500(.500 spine),a CE 150 has a spine of .487 so a Easton/Beman 500 would be close also depending on length how much weight up front,a CE 250 has a spine of .373 so a 400(.400 spine) these would be close but may tune alittle different.Ad's are good shafts also,an AD Trad Lite says it spines at .350 and the Trads spine at .300.But I find these spec's don't compare to parallel carbons.I mean the Trads spine at .300 and they are not as stiff as my Axis 300's(.300 spine).AD's are a tapered carbon which seems to help them work for alot of bows.
Title: Re: comparable carbons
Post by: amar911 on May 26, 2009, 12:12:00 AM
Bob,

The AD Trad Lites will fly well out of your bows. The Trad "Heavies" probably would too, but you don't need to go that heavy for most of the hunting or shooting you would do.

Allan
Title: Re: comparable carbons
Post by: Cupcake on May 26, 2009, 03:53:00 PM
CE90 is .531, a 2016 is .531 (same as the black GG 500)

CE150 is .487, closest aluminum is 2115 at .461

CE250 is .373, closest aluminum is 2216 at .376