Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: beaver#1 on March 16, 2009, 10:52:00 PM

Title: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 16, 2009, 10:52:00 PM
i just got my first heavey long bow. i call it heavey its just 65# but that is heavier than anything i have shot.  great northern critter gitter.   my question is would be a good wood arrow/broad head setup to get it over 700gr?
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 16, 2009, 11:07:00 PM
ttt
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Broken Arrow 1 on March 16, 2009, 11:21:00 PM
I Like lam birch for heavy arrows. I have had lam birch finished arrows weigh in at 685 with a 145 eclipse up front.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 16, 2009, 11:22:00 PM
are they pretty tough? i am rough on stuff.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Broken Arrow 1 on March 16, 2009, 11:27:00 PM
They are one of the toughest wood arrows Ive shot.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 16, 2009, 11:29:00 PM
thanks
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on March 17, 2009, 12:00:00 AM
A 160 grain broadhead and Douglas fir shaft should get you over 700 grains. I highly recommend these shafts from  www.surewoodshafts.com (http://www.surewoodshafts.com)  . They also have the stiffness required, whereas other shafts don't.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 17, 2009, 12:03:00 AM
thanks ben. i am wanting at least 700 grns. with these.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on March 17, 2009, 05:19:00 AM
No worries, mate. You'll be fine with Douglas fir.

My set-up is a 30" arrow wearing a 160 grain broadhead / tip, and each one weighs a total of 775 grains. The spine I use is 105# (I shoot about 83# of cut-past-centre Schafer Silvertip recurve).

My mate has some 95# spine Douglas fir, and with a 160 grain head, and at 29", they weigh 740 grains.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 17, 2009, 09:15:00 AM
this bow is not cut to center but i figure if i put enough weight up front it will take care of that.  is my thinking right here
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Orion on March 17, 2009, 10:32:00 AM
Great Northerns are amazingly forgiving re spine.  A 75# spine in an 11/32 shaft with 160 grain head should work well if you're drawing 28 inches.  May be able to drop down to 70# in 23/64.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: straitera on March 17, 2009, 11:08:00 AM
Great options above. The fun is discovering your own setup IMO. Any woods spined to your weight will work especially with heavier heads. JMO, try making your own. Can't beat cedars in 11/32 if your peak weight isn't excessive.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Terry Green on March 17, 2009, 11:09:00 AM
Compressed Maples....now there's a 700 plus grain train wreck.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Frank V on March 17, 2009, 12:24:00 PM
I get my hex shafts & arrows form Bob Burton  www.whisperingwindarrows.com (http://www.whisperingwindarrows.com)  They can be had in very heavy weights & are very tough. Frank
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: frassettor on March 17, 2009, 12:32:00 PM
Tapered Hickory worked for me, with a 160 gr magnus 1
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: ron w on March 17, 2009, 02:27:00 PM
All the ones mentioned in the posts above are good ones, I would look for the best deal on any of those shafts. I shoot Lam birch at 31" 125gr head I get 725gr. 60-65 spine from a 51# bow.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 17, 2009, 07:18:00 PM
i shoot a 31# arrow so i will look around and see what i find
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Fletcher on March 17, 2009, 10:42:00 PM
Beaver, assuming you mean a 31 inch arrow, lam birch will put you well over the 700 gr mark.  I have 26.5" x 21/64" 55-60 lam birch that go 700 w/ a 160 point.  Braveheart Archery has the Surewood Fir and you will be able to get that weight.

Congrats on the Critter Gitter, Great Bow!!    :thumbsup:
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Steertalker on March 18, 2009, 12:13:00 PM
If you want tough....why not carbons???
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: beaver#1 on March 18, 2009, 01:25:00 PM
carbons cost way too much on my small budget.  plus i like shooting wood soo much better.  it might be just me but they seem to hit harder for some reason.  it does not make me cry when i shoot a wood arrow into the brush like it does when i shoot a 20 dollar carbon.
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Steertalker on March 18, 2009, 02:15:00 PM
I used to shoot wood but they break too easy and the amount of work you have to put into a set wasn't worth it too me.  Carbons are tough and in the long run are way cheaper (cost) than woods.  Unless you loose one or just plain shoot them into a brick wall, a carbon arrow will last indefinitely and shoot way better than anything else.  Oh well...to each his own.

Brett
Title: Re: first "heavy" bow
Post by: Horne Shooter on March 18, 2009, 03:18:00 PM
Beaver, I have to concur with Steertalker.  Carbons are initially expensive but I have some Carbon Express 250's that are so old I can't remember how many times I've refletched them.  As well as being super tough they are also resistant to moisture.  Now if you shoot wood because well,it's wood....that's cool.  I like the thought of shooting wood for all of the noramal tradional reasons but I don't think saving money is one of them.