Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Divinecedar on September 28, 2008, 04:08:00 PM

Title: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Divinecedar on September 28, 2008, 04:08:00 PM
I was thinking about putting a pair of limbsavers on my longbow, but realized that they may detract from the aesthetics a bit. My bow isn't loud, but I really would like to quiet it down some, and I am not a great fan of string silencers. Does anyone have any limbsavers on their bows?
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: BobW on September 28, 2008, 04:28:00 PM
I'm assuming you mean the "mushrooms", and not string Leaches...

I use them... look into the "mini" models - sold to wheelie guys to quiet accessories.  

My bows they are on:  Shrew Classic Hunter & ChekMate Crusader - slender limbs - so the mini one look "best".

I also have a full sized set on my Chekmate Hunter II.

Yeah, they work.  Keep in mind, you won't be able to use a slip-on quiver....

As to string products - it doesn't get aqny better than the Bow Hush & Hush Puppies.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: zipper bowss on September 28, 2008, 05:55:00 PM
I have used the mushrooms and they do work well.
Bill
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: heydeerman on September 28, 2008, 06:10:00 PM
Tey made a big difference on my PSAV
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Bill Carlsen on September 28, 2008, 06:14:00 PM
My wife and I each shoot DAS bows. They came with Limbsavers. Last month I had to get a new set of limbs for my wife's bow. We got the bow all tuned and shooting very quietly without the Limbsavers. I am not certain how much they affect performance or actually dampen sound based on my wife's new limbs. After this season I am going to take them off my bow and see what, if any, difference there is.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Shawn Leonard on September 28, 2008, 06:27:00 PM
Ugly, they may work but ya can get your bow just as quiet using other methods. Shawn
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on September 28, 2008, 06:35:00 PM
Ugly, in my opinion, for my bows. My mate uses them on his high-tech recurve, and that's fine, but there's no way I'd want to spoil the lines of a lovely Silvertip, Black Widow or Howard Hill by putting them on - and the animals have never had a problem with the small amount of sound my bows make.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Curveman on September 28, 2008, 06:58:00 PM
I'm with Shawn and Ben. I am shooting my longbow this year which is whisper quiet but I have taken many game with my noisier recurve.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: SHOOTO8S on September 28, 2008, 07:04:00 PM
I think Limbsavers are indeed ugly on a bow...that said, I have them on every bow I shoot, even on my target bow's that don't need to be quiet.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: SilverTip on September 28, 2008, 07:17:00 PM
I use them, they work

 Billy
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: DeerSpotter on September 28, 2008, 07:22:00 PM
The best method for quieting your bow is getting your right brace ht, and the proper arrow weight.  And don't forget about sliding your cat whiskers, or string silencers to the right place, sometimes you need to put a pair(2) on the bottom limb.

The most effective limb savers are the quads.


Pastor Carl
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: Buckeye Trad Hunter on September 28, 2008, 07:43:00 PM
I use them on my Hummingbird recurve as well as my Striker longbow.  I agree they do take from the looks some but are very effective.  Along with quieting your bow they will also help to absorb some hand shock if your bow has any.  You can pick up the mini limb savers from 3-rivers.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: James Wrenn on September 28, 2008, 09:01:00 PM
Well I think they dress up a bow real nice.I use them on any bow I plan on shooting light arrows from.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: jeff w on September 28, 2008, 09:21:00 PM
For me, it depended on the individual bow as to how well they worked.   On some bows they made a bigger difference than on other bows.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: GrnMtnTradNut on September 29, 2008, 07:31:00 AM
I use them they work great, I put them at the end of the fade outs, the quiter the bow the better I use them in conjunction with my hushpuppy's and bow hush
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: mooseman76 on September 29, 2008, 08:54:00 AM
Just how much vibration do these things soak up?  I remember reading that some put them on their limbs in case of an accidental dry fire.  The theory was that the limbsavers would soak up enough vibration to possibly protect the limbs.  Is this true?  Could these little mushrooms possibly save your limbs in a worst case scenario?  May be something I should look into...Mike
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: indianalongbowshooter on September 29, 2008, 09:07:00 AM
No matter how quiet you get your bow theyll make it quieter plus they take out any residual vibration thats left...they also protect your bow against a dry fire..not pretty but very functional, on all my bows..
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: John3 on September 29, 2008, 12:01:00 PM
Ugly is not the best description in my opinion. Sure they do not add anything to the aesthetics of a bow, esp a longbow. I would call them "modern"...

Due to the fact that they fail the "trad test" of my personal trad scale (LOL) I've never thought about using them.

If they help your bow to be quiet.. Go ahead and try/shoot them.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: bbairborne on September 29, 2008, 12:15:00 PM
They work GREAT!!!  Really effective (noticeable) when you drop to a lighter arrow weight.  Hunting setup is 530 - 540 for Elk then I drop to 480-490 for Deer and I can really hear a difference. I don't think they look all that bad either.  Good Luck.
------------------
Trad Rag | com | Giveaways
Stick & String or Cap & Ball
Longbow: ACS-CX 58#@28. Arrow: GT5575 Traditional, 100gr. Brass insert, 125 gr. Magnus 2-blade: 530 gr. total.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: BD on September 29, 2008, 03:07:00 PM
I noticed a difference on my Hoyt GM, but no difference whatsoever on my palmer or habu.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: jrstegner on September 29, 2008, 05:22:00 PM
I put them on a Static tip recurve I was having trouble quieting. The difference was amazing. At first I was offended by the appearance. Now I wouldn't have a recurve without installing them.
Title: Re: Limbsavers - Good, Bad or Ugly?
Post by: SteveB on September 29, 2008, 05:57:00 PM
I think a bow looks incomplete without them.  :bigsmyl:  

Steve