Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: snag on July 22, 2008, 07:10:00 PM

Title: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: snag on July 22, 2008, 07:10:00 PM
For those of you who have shot both Morrison bows how would you compare them? Which do you feel is smoother drawing and less hand shock?
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: MRD on July 22, 2008, 07:27:00 PM
If you are asking about the recurve limbs on both, I prefer the the Cheyenne.  Not as much preload as the Shawnee, and the deflexed riser is more forgiving for me.  Wouldn't worry about handshock on either.  Nor speed, but I think the Shawnee may be a wee bit faster.     Both great bows.  The ILF is my favorite Morrison bow, though...and I've had a few.   :D
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Danny Rowan on July 22, 2008, 08:29:00 PM
David,

For me the Cheyenne. I have both but shoot the Cheyenne the best, it feels heavier in the hand than the Shawnee which is what I like. I need the mass weight to shoot well. Just came in from shooting my 56",63#@28" macasser beauty. Have not shot it in a while cause I have been in love with the Brack and Dale Dye. Dead on with it like always.

Danny
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: leatherneck on July 23, 2008, 09:49:00 AM
WOW! Tough question. I think the Shawnee is smoother only because of the new foam core limbs. My Cheyenne was boo core not foam. Now I believe Bob is putting foam in the Cheyenne limbs now.  Given the same limb material I might change my mind. Shock-don't have any in neither. Speed-once again, foam cores get a slight edge. I like the look of the Shawnee better but throw in some antler bolts on the Cheyenne and that changes. I know, I'm not helping you any. Both are awesome bows.

Mike
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Terry Green on July 23, 2008, 11:44:00 AM
I have both....love both....shoot both well.  

They Cheyenne is of a more forgiving design as far as shootability with the deflexed riser....and 'seems' more pointable.

Other than that....all else is pretty equal.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Chris Surtees on July 23, 2008, 03:24:00 PM
I'm with Terry on this one. Have both and just love them.

It would be a hard choice to pick which one I like best as both are smooth drawing with no hand shock. Plus I shoot both equally well. IMO you can not go wrong with either.

I will say that the Shawnee with Dakota limbs is more appealing to the eye IMO but I have always liked the looks of longbows over recurves.

CS
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: kadbow on July 23, 2008, 06:54:00 PM
They are both performers.  It comes down to personal preference.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Jedimaster on July 23, 2008, 07:41:00 PM
I've had both with foam core limbs.  For what it is worth, I don't feel there is a nickel's worth of difference in performance (but I do not chrono).  Both were incredibly smooth, dead in the hand, quiet, and very quick.  I did prefer the Cheyenne riser for exactly the reasons given above.  Additional stability due to mass and pointability and forgiveness were better with the deflexed riser.

Bottom line: I'd love to own another Cheyenne someday.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: larry on July 23, 2008, 09:25:00 PM
I've had both with foam core limbs, sold the Cheyenne, kept the Shawnee. "B" riser with "D" dakota limbs, oh boy is it a sweet shooter.

larry
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Shawn Leonard on July 23, 2008, 09:46:00 PM
I have owned both and I prefered the Cheyenne, it was much more forgiving of my less than perfect release. Shawn
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: DEAN on July 23, 2008, 11:27:00 PM
SHAWNEE ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SMOOTH AS GLASS
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: limbow on July 24, 2008, 12:11:00 AM
I second the Shawnee. Make SURE you try all of Bob's grip offerings. By dumb luck, I have learned I prefer and shoot well: The locator grip option. Just my 2 cents.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Nakohe on July 24, 2008, 01:04:00 AM
I am with Terry and Chris. I have both with boo limbs and shoot both equally well. I went from 64" limbs to 58" on the Shawnee and like it much better at that length.

Donald
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: Irish on July 24, 2008, 12:48:00 PM
I have shot both, but own the Cheyenne.   I like the deflexed riser, more forgiving.  Both are very quick, well made bows.  Bob does some great work, and is a class act.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: TexasTrad on July 24, 2008, 02:31:00 PM
I own and like both the Cheyenne (bamboo core) and a Shawnee (foam core).  For me the Cheyenne is a little smoother on the draw.  However, they are both really great bows.

MRD -- I am interested in your comment about the ILF.  I have not shot one -- why is it your favorite out of the three?   There is a really great looking ILF riser in the stock bow section on the Morrison website.  I was tempted to buy it but was unsure about the ILF system.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: MRD on July 24, 2008, 04:38:00 PM
TexasTrad

I really like the ability to adjust preload to get a comfortable and smooth draw that feels good to me.  I can adjust weight by about 5 lbs., too. Tiller can be easily adjusted, but I don't have a lot of knowledge on that aspect.   I've only shot Morrison limbs on my two risers, but there are a lot of very good and inexpensive limbs readily available.  

All in all, maybe it's just more room to tweak and tinker, LOL!

BTW, is it the mesquite/macassar riser you were eyeing?  That one surely caught my eye!
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: TexasTrad on July 24, 2008, 07:58:00 PM
MRD -- I was looking at the Zebrawood and Ebony riser -- just checked and it is still out there.  That is one of the best looking wood combinations I have seen.
Title: Re: Cheyenne or Shawnee?
Post by: MRD on July 25, 2008, 09:56:00 AM
I know what you mean.  I have on that I am really happy with.

(http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g291/MarkDrayer/IMG_1097.jpg)
(http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g291/MarkDrayer/IMG_1091.jpg)