Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: SouthMDShooter on June 27, 2008, 05:32:00 PM

Title: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: SouthMDShooter on June 27, 2008, 05:32:00 PM
Well as some of you can see im looking to buy a 3 blade bh for this fall and now im stuck on what to get.

What do you guys prefer a snuffer or WW? what are your experinces with them? pros cons? any input is much appreciated. Thanks
-Curtis
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: SouthMDShooter on June 27, 2008, 05:33:00 PM
oh these will be flinging out of my 53lb longbow
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: BigRonHuntAlot on June 27, 2008, 05:46:00 PM
Well, I havent had any game animals complain a bit after putting a WW through them. They didnt say anything at all when I took them to the truck. I cannot offer any advice on the Snuffer as I have not hunted with them yet.  I do Like the Razorcaps better though. More Durable and easily tuned with the different ferrules. Can get them SHARP too.

Good Luck in your endeavors!
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Bowhunter4life on June 27, 2008, 05:59:00 PM
Well I'd have a bunch of questions before I could give a sound answer.

53# @ what draw length?  What kind of bow? I know you said longbow, but a Hill style longbow or a R/D hybrid?  There's a difference. What weight arrow are you planning on shooting?  What are you planning on shooting?  Which Snuffer are you planning on shooting?  The heavier they are the wider they are, and the more "umph" it will need to get through the goodies.  

The Woodsman would be the safe choice in my book, and a good one at that, but I would maybe be able to recommend you go with a Snuffer too.  Depending on your answers to the above.  For example sake: there is a big difference in a HH Wesley 53# @ 26" and an ACS-CX 53# @ 30".
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 27, 2008, 06:21:00 PM
out of my 51(red oak board bow) & 52 (shrew)pound bows Snuffers fly great...
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: SouthMDShooter on June 27, 2008, 06:36:00 PM
Im shooting 53#@ 28 inches out of a northern mist baraga which has a slight R/D deisgn in it.

Im shooting GT 3555 with 150 up front

And i will be shooting deer
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: VA Bowbender on June 27, 2008, 06:58:00 PM
I used Snuffer 125's last season on GT 5575's,
@ 30", from a 54# Pittsley Predator.  I shot a nice 8 pt buck at approx 15 yds.  It should have been a double lunger but I only got about 6-7" penatration.  This season I'm putting 125gr up front plus a 125 Snuffer (250grs).  I would suggest you add more weight on either WW or Snuffer's.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: joe skipp on June 27, 2008, 08:47:00 PM
Can't go wrong with either head. Snuffer cuts a larger hole, WW with its 3:1 design probably will penetrate a tad better. Personally, I prefer the larger 160 grain Snuffer.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: BigRonHuntAlot on June 27, 2008, 08:50:00 PM
SHOT PLACEMENT !! ... and a tuned setup.  Nuff Said.  ;)
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: J-dog on June 27, 2008, 08:53:00 PM
Yeah shoot what flies good for ya, keep it sharp. no experience with either head but 53# should drive it through and through.

J
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Izzy on June 27, 2008, 08:53:00 PM
Ive had pass throughs on both of the deer I shot with 125 Snuffers.One was a little gal but it hit spine from a tree stand and still poked right through.The other was a clear pass through, high lung in, behind the shoulder out.She was about 140 lb's.I leave them with very fine serrations and they are nasty.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: robtattoo on June 27, 2008, 09:13:00 PM
My only experiences with either were in Texas last year.

Round 1) 125gn Snuffer vs. Goat = snuffer bounced off from a shoulder hit.

Round 2) 125gn WW vs. Goat = Really dead goat. Complete passthrough including 1 severed rib & a shattered scapula.

To be fair to the Snuffer, I don't think I really had it sharpened as well as it should've been, but I've kinda mis-trusted them since. I know others swear by them, but my confidence in 'em took a knock that I'm struggling to shake.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: WidowEater on June 27, 2008, 09:22:00 PM
the only thing i can say is get the Snuffer SS.  The quality control on these is much better than either the regular snuffer or the ww.  Other than that I can say there is no significant difference between them from the animals and targets ive hit them with.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: HARL on June 27, 2008, 09:40:00 PM
My snuffers always passed through the animals and could be used again.When I shot the woodsman the tip curled.I gave the rest of the woodsman away.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on June 27, 2008, 09:58:00 PM
Well, I've used both, but only from heavy bows. With the WW I've collected an experience that could be used to criticise them, but I've also collected two great experiences with which to praise them. With Snuffers, I had four pass-throughs on four goats. Obviously I don't have anything like a definitive study on them. They obviously work fairly well (just look at all the game taken with both). Something that bothers me, though, is the advertising nonsense that 3Rivers (and I love 3Rivers; they provide excellent service to Australia) uses to promote the WW, saying that no big game animal is safe from them, that they have more penetrating power than any other broadhead, etc. Anyone who tries to use a WW on a water buffalo or elephant is running huge risks, going against common sense, and needs to give himself an uppercut. Other game, no worries (with enough bow and arrow). I have a heap of heavies just freshly made-up wearing WWs. But they are not for buffalo.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on June 27, 2008, 10:01:00 PM
Harl, if you snip a mm off the tip with side cutters, it strengthens it greatly.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Morning Star on June 27, 2008, 10:04:00 PM
For me, my 53lb @ 27" Widows with a 615gr carbons = 36lbs of KE.

Snuffer 160's had penetration issues, BUT dead deer none the less. Just couldn't push them out the opposite chest wall.

Woodsman have serious problems with sticking in the dirt after they blow through the chest. It's annoying having to clean the dirt out of the vents.  They also have problems with all that blood on the ground. A disturbing crime scene.    ;)    

My setup and experiences with 20+ woodsman killed deer......woodsman is the best head for me.

I've had a couple tip curls, but not sure if it was from the deer or they hit a rock underground.     :)  
Everyone has there own experiences, those are mine.  Lately, I do file the tip slightly. Doesn't hurt a thing and with all the complaints out there about factory angle tip problems...why not.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Zbone on June 27, 2008, 10:57:00 PM
Been shooting Woodsmans since they came out and they performed great, although I clip the tips, there's a bunch of posts about that.

My woodsman supply was getting low, and with all the recent hoopla of extreme FOC, decided to try the 160gr Snuffers this year and recently purchase a couple dozen. They fly good but haven't shot anything with them yet. This season, hope to see one of the colossal blood trails everyone talks about...8^)
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: SouthMDShooter on June 28, 2008, 02:04:00 AM
Ive heard the WW are hard to sharpen is this true?
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: tradtusker on June 28, 2008, 04:50:00 AM
they are a bit tricky to sharpen mate but only because they have not payed close attention in the grinding process and there is a slight low spot about 2/3 of the way up the head so it needs a bit of work to get them perfectly flat, once they are though you can get them very sharp easily.
lots of threads on here about sharpening the WW

they are a good head!
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: longbawl on June 28, 2008, 05:05:00 AM
There not hard to sharpen. They are a little hard to get the blades flat.But i heard they fixed that. I tried snuffers they didnt work for me. I shot them out of a 50@28 curve an a 57@28 R/D long bow. I also had penetration issues.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Rob DiStefano on June 28, 2008, 06:35:00 AM
My 55# longbow I had an experience with a 585gr Snuffered arra and a hog that still haunts me to this day, so I'm back to WW's for good.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v82/rfdee/archery/snuff1.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v82/rfdee/archery/snuff2.jpg)
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Mr.Magoo on June 28, 2008, 07:46:00 AM
Shot a deer last year with a 53@29 longbow and a 160 snuffer (total arrow about 550gr.).  Hit lungs, ribs, liver and the arrow never even slowed down.  I've also had bad penetration with a 145 snuffer when the deer spun around and ran at the shot.  Hit him angling down into the kidneys.  Never found any blood, but saw the deer later in the season so he was okay.

The moral is, make good shots and you'll be fine with the snuffer.  The Woodsmans I ordered a year or so ago had such quality control issues that I won't bother with them again.
Title: Re: W.W. vs Snuffer
Post by: Curveman on June 28, 2008, 08:07:00 AM
I shoot WW but I don't think you can go wrong with either. I shot Snuffers sucessfully before I switched. Thy're all good. If I ever get to hunt a cape then I will revisit that.