Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: buckeyebowhunter on October 31, 2020, 07:10:27 PM

Title: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on October 31, 2020, 07:10:27 PM
There's a lot of buzz right now about heavy arrows and single bevel heads. And while I've always shot heavy arrows I figured I'd give the heavy single bevels a shot this fall. I will leave out brand names as I don't want to turn this into a product bash.

So far I've managed to arrow two does and my father arrowed a stud buck with a very similar arrow setup as mine with his compound. All 3 shots were in my opinion good shots on broadside deer with one slightly quartering to. 2 were pass through with the quartering shot maybe getting 18 inches of penetration. Long story short the deer were not recovered so maybe the shots were not as good as we'd thought but none the less this brings me to my point.

The blood trails from all 3 shots were so minimal that the tracking was a nightmare. Basically drops from impact until drying up several hundred yards later.

I've never experienced this shooting my old Zwickey deltas or snuffers so therefore I will be switching back for the remainder of the season to hopefully save face. I will not say that I've never lost deer using my old heads but I never experienced such minimal blood trails.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Possum Head on October 31, 2020, 09:39:38 PM
Never felt compelled to try a single but provided they are sharp they should cause equal bleeding I would think.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: ed lash on October 31, 2020, 10:10:13 PM
In my experience, these broadheads can really penetrate bone and cause humerus fractures. Shot my biggest buck (over 205"after deduct) with one of these. Was never pleased with my sharpening and I studied up on best ways, methods, etc. Not impressed with the blood trails either. Quit using them and have had better luck. Sorry for the lost deer..that hurts like crazy.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: 1Arrow1Kill on October 31, 2020, 10:18:08 PM
Dang!  I considered switching to single bevel and am now glad I procrastinated.  I'll learn from your lesson and stick with my current setup.  Sorry for your loss . . .
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on October 31, 2020, 10:28:57 PM
I will say they are easy to sharpen. One thing I really did like about them. But I am simply baffled by the lack of blood. I've heard a lot of people say that they're great because you don't have to track "the animals rarely run out of sight". Which sounds great until they do and you have no blood trail. Trying to track a deer with no blood may be one of the worst feeling you can experience as a hunter in my opinion. And the hills here in southeastern Ohio don't really lend themselves to allowing you to watch a deer after the shot for very long.

Once again I'm not trying to bash SB and I really was confident in shooting them but I'm really losing confidence quickly. If I have to track a deer I need to be able to see some blood.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on October 31, 2020, 10:32:34 PM
I bought some early in my traditional experience and I found the same thing with blood trails.  I also found out they don't penetrate a boars shield and better than my other heads and it really hurts to see that $30 head run off in a pig.
That said I have more experience now and am a better shooter so my intention is to give them another try.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Gun on October 31, 2020, 11:49:43 PM
I think there’s more involved here than just the broad head. I shot a big bull moose first year I tried them and had the best blood trail ever w a two blade.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 01, 2020, 05:07:58 AM
Gun, I believe there is probably a lot of variables to simply blame it on the broadhead as well. I am simply comparing my initial results to my older wider double bevel heads.
Also correct me if I'm wrong but I think comparing a large animal like a bull moose to a whitetail is quite different also as their vitals, arteries, etc are huge and would result in more blood produced if severed.
I'm no biologist so my theory may have no merit.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Jon Stewart on November 01, 2020, 07:01:49 AM
Every other year someone comes out with something new and improved. Just a sales gimmick as far as I am concerned.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: PICKNGRIN on November 01, 2020, 07:17:09 AM
A buddy of mine has used them and he too was very disappointed in blood trails on well hit deer.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Anyminutenow on November 01, 2020, 08:04:54 AM
Great topic/question. Starting this traditional addiction later in my life. SB broadhead are the only thing I’ve put through game. I wondered if my lack of blood trails was just due to my own poor tracking. Be it lack of woodsmanship or lack of experience.

So, I purchased a kme broadhead kit after reading on here about them. I wasn’t doing a good enough job before. The difference for me was night and day. It’s no substitute for shot placement. However, it’s helped me get 2 holes (entry/exit), better blood, and shorter recoveries. I recently arrowed my largest whitetail, and couldn’t have been happier with the results. Lots of luck.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Kevin Dill on November 01, 2020, 10:33:40 AM
I’ve shot SBBs exclusively for 10 years. My experience has been that I get better penetration and better bloodtrails than any other heads I’ve used....period. Additionally, I’ve noticed a much greater percentage of the animals I’ve killed have gone down in sight and didn’t even require trailing. But it’s not only about having one bevel. It’s also about broadhead shape and design, sharpness, weight, and accuracy of the shot. The best broadhead will get poor bloodtrails if the shot isn’t on the money.



This doe was killed 2 weeks ago. The arrow flashed through her and lodged solidly into the ground. She bounded 20 yards....paused and went down. She lost her lights in less than 5 seconds. There was so much blood through the tall weeds I had to avoid walking where she ran.

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

I have watched my last 7 or 8 deer go down before getting out of sight. Same with a couple bears and multiple moose. I don’t ever try to convince anyone to use them, but I definitely know how effectively they work for me and a number of my friends.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Gun on November 01, 2020, 10:35:33 AM
Guys, look up Ranch Fairy on YouTube.
I’ll only add that make sure they’re SCARY sharp. This years bull arrow hit opposite shoulder w a Zwickey Delta. He only went about 20 yds. I just wanted to try them. Didn’t bleed a bit.
My best bull a few years back was complete pass thru back lungs going in. Tight behind leg coming out. Steady blood for 100 yds
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 01, 2020, 11:22:17 AM
I've watched Ranch Fairy's stuff and I like his videos very informative and I believe what he says. Like I said I've always shot heavy arrows, shot aluminums for years and then switched to heavy carbons. Penetration has never been an issue, and ranch fairy is part of the reason I went to using these heads but golly I would've thought that at least one of the 3 deer so far this fall would've bled. Like said shot placement is critical but I did not believe these shots were poor. Perhaps it is design of particular broadhead we've been using (all 3 hits with same head)

Kevin what brand of SB are you shooting?

Thanks for all the replies.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 01, 2020, 11:30:36 AM
I understand the sharpness factor too, but geesh if you can get a head shaving sharp and blowing through deer, how much sharper can you realistically get?
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Kevin Dill on November 01, 2020, 12:49:38 PM
bbh.....

I’ve been shooting the Abowyer Wapiti 175 gr the past decade. I’ve never ruined one, but I’ve lost a few from arrows that flew through animals and disappeared.

I really want to be clear that I’m not a SBB junkie. I started shooting them after studying every bit of data and physics I could find. I wanted a big SOLID piece of quality steel. I had to prove to myself they could be made as sharp as my other heads. I also needed to see that the final cutting edge held up and didn’t ‘roll’ as is often brought up. After so many years I haven’t ever found a single negative.

Maybe the biggest negative is the hype, which they don’t warrant. They aren’t the holy grail of heads. To me they are a percent type of thing....maybe offering an improvement in certain situations (but not all) and having no perceivable negatives in performance on game.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: mec lineman on November 01, 2020, 01:07:10 PM
I have tried single bevel heads. Mainly Grizzlies. Can really get them sharp. If your arrow strays and hits bone, this is where I personally saw them shine. I only hunt white tails, black bear and Turkey. It is my opinion on those game animals I listed, I think it is an advantage to shoot the widest broadhead  possible.  I'm not saying everyone has to shoot Tree Sharks. But a Tiger Shark doesn't hurt or a Snuffer!
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: SuperK on November 01, 2020, 01:56:12 PM
My first doe this year was shot with a single bevel Grizzly.  I did not find a single drop of blood.  I used a rechargeable spotlight and looked until the light went dead.  As I was heading back to my truck, I found the deer in the edge of the field.  My arrow entered back of the last rib at midline and exited slightly above midline just back of the shoulder blade.  (I was hunting from a ground blind)  A large wad of gut was poking out of the entrance wound (about the size of an orange) and had sealed it off.  She didn't go 60 yards.   Would a different broadhead have produced a bloodtrail?   :dunno:    Fact is, most of my single bevel Grizzly kills on deer have had very good bloodtrails.   
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Kevin Dill on November 01, 2020, 02:21:54 PM
My experience has been that any hit involving the abdomen (as in any area behind the diaphragm) is a potential wild card. That’s because the abdomen is basically a positive pressure capsule, anything that penetrates it produces the effect of a hernia. The abdominal contents tend to push outward and plug the wound. I’ve seen it many, many times.

Meanwhile the chest (thorax) is essentially a negative pressure area. The negative pressure on inspiration is what helps the lungs expand. The diaphragm is the device which keeps both areas functioning correctly. Punching through it internally can also produce a gut herniation into the wound toward the chest.

What all this means for a bloodtrail is inconclusive at best, but it does indicate a lot of potential for variables and outcomes.  Great topic.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 01, 2020, 02:40:35 PM
If a two blade head is made of a decent steel I can sharpen it.  I get excellent blood trails from the relatively inexpensive wide cut head I shoot.  So the not sharp enough line doesn't apply to me.  Plus, if you've actually dropped the coin on a half dozen Grizzlies you know they come scary sharp.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: SuperK on November 01, 2020, 03:11:15 PM
Wasn't there a long thread a few years ago that was titled "single bevels and the missing bloodtrail " or something like that?
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 01, 2020, 03:20:34 PM
Wasn't there a long thread a few years ago that was titled "single bevels and the missing bloodtrail " or something like that?
Yep, I read through it for the first time last night after making this post. Seems a lot of different opinions and some controversy surrounding single bevel.

I don't doubt those who say they are happy with them. But I'm just not a good enough shot or tracker  I guess to not get blood trails. And the woods around here are so thick and hilly that you might lose sight of a deer after 40 yards or so.  I know blood trails aren't everything but they sure do help me out
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: BAK on November 01, 2020, 04:03:40 PM
Well, if you have a blade 3 inches long and 1 inch wide, with equally sharp edges, what scientific premise is going to inhibit blood flow from one and not the other.    :banghead:
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 01, 2020, 04:23:30 PM
Well I've got the stitches and the scars to prove how just a straight wide slice will bleed ya. :knothead: :biglaugh:
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 01, 2020, 04:27:04 PM
I'm going to take the Grizzlies on a hunt this coming weekend.   Only a whitetail doe hunt but I should get shot opportunities.  I will be in some rocky areas so the decision to shoot them will be based on opportunity for destruction of a $30 broadhead but if not I'll have them in my quiver at the ranch and pigs or deer will get to taste them.
I'll post back up if I do and the results.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: mec lineman on November 01, 2020, 04:44:27 PM
When did Grizzlies become so expensive. The ones I shot were the most economical broadhead to date.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: IndaTimber on November 01, 2020, 08:20:29 PM
When did Grizzlies become so expensive. The ones I shot were the most economical broadhead to date.

Me too. Just bought 6 for $48 and based on the previous comment about scary sharp out of the package makes me think he has a different head.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Bowwild on November 01, 2020, 08:29:40 PM
I've been using Strickland Helix SBB for several years. Every since I watched the video of a deer his wife Shirley shot as it ran off (on video) pumping blood as it ran. It has an unusual shape, and I'll admit, if I didn't know and trust the maker personally, I would probably not have tried it.

While I've been quite pleased with it. I think there are many great broadheads on the market these days, not like the late 70's and 80's.   I have a few Grizz and VPA but I haven't hunted with them. 

The Helix is the only broadhead I've ever sharpened with the roller wheels Tim recommends.  Very easy and fast to touch up.  I've always trusted angled ceramic rods in the past. The ceramic rods don't work (for me) with these broadheads.

Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 01, 2020, 11:12:12 PM
When did Grizzlies become so expensive. The ones I shot were the most economical broadhead to date.

Me too. Just bought 6 for $48 and based on the previous comment about scary sharp out of the package makes me think he has a different head.
The older German made heads were $90 for three.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: TwistedHollow on November 02, 2020, 01:35:22 AM
I shot a buck this year with a 175 grain Eclipse werewolf single bevel. Penetration was excellent went through both shoulder blades. My draw weight I’m
Shooting is 50lbs. Was definitely impressed with penetration but From what I seen too bold trail was horrible. Now this is the only time I’ve used
 single bevel but just was I observed also for a trail.

On a side note if your thinking of using these heads customer service is A++ great company to deal with.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 02, 2020, 07:00:58 AM
When did Grizzlies become so expensive. The ones I shot were the most economical broadhead to date.

Me too. Just bought 6 for $48 and based on the previous comment about scary sharp out of the package makes me think he has a different head.
Apparently I am.  I apologize.   Please excuse my ignorance.
https://www.grizzlystik.com/mobile/Single-Bevel-Broadheads-C15.aspx
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Cory Mattson on November 02, 2020, 08:00:37 AM
Interesting posts ALL. Buckeye lets take a step back a minute. The evidence you cite tells me none of these were good hits. If we agree a "good hit" starts with finding an arrow that passed through covered stem to stern with blood.

minimal blood sign drying up HUNDREDS of Yards ?! - Hundreds is a Long way. You mention two are pass throughs. Passed through what? If the arrow passed through guts no tracking should have been done that day but I don't want to get side tracked here. Not trying to be overly optimistic but I have no reason to think these deer are dead. And of course you can't find deer that aren't dead. 

<><
<------------------<<<<<
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 02, 2020, 10:25:00 AM
Cory this is from my doe on Saturday. Complete pass through stuck in ground. My mind's eye told me it was a perfect shot behind the arm pit but just above the brisket or bottom of deer. Of course our minds eye isn't always correct. But this is my arrow. Nothing tells me this isn't a heart shot deer. Once again i could be wrong.   [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

The other two shots I describe were both marginal BUT they were 100% not ponch hits or even back for that matter.

Once again I have no objective evidence that the shots were amazing. BUT my point is I thought these heads were supposed to shine on marginal or shots that we thought were perhaps a little off as long as they weren't in fact gut shots.

Nothing about these heads 1 and 1/8 single bevel 250 grains. Have shown me that they would do more than a Zwickey Delta on a whitetail. And as some have said the heads that I am shooting are also near $25 a piece.

I suppose my overall conclusion with making this post is to maybe keep some people from spending their cash on heads that may not be so much better than our traditional 2 blade heads.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Cory Mattson on November 02, 2020, 11:06:58 AM
Yes Buckeye that arrow looks good thanks
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Ryan Rothhaar on November 02, 2020, 12:54:00 PM
After a decade of dog tracking, and going on more deer trailing expeditions than most guys will go on in a lifetime, with all kinds of broadheads, traditional and modern, I've only been able to correlate one thing....In my experience, on average, the bigger the broadhead, the more blood on the ground.  We rarely got called on "good" hits, but only on ones where they couldn't find the deer themselves.

Never saw a single vs double bevel correlation to blood amount, just broadhead size.  ALL broadhead performance info is simply anecdotal, there is no way to do scientific correlation, too many variables at play (no matter what some folks claim...I dont want to get off topic but I can argue science...its what I've done as a career for over 20 years :biglaugh:). This is just my personal anecdotal observation after 100's of tracks, the majority of which were "poorly hit" deer.  You hit em perfect...likely doesn't matter.

R
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: ozy clint on November 02, 2020, 02:57:41 PM
have to agree with Ryan.
blood trails are in my experience, short and profuse or long and protracted often with nothing at the end of it.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 02, 2020, 03:33:02 PM
If a deer is shot through the heart or both lungs with a reasonably sharp broadhead then it should be found dead in under 150 yards.  Many times under 50.  Even the vaunted big boar hog will expire quickly when double lunged by a razor sharp broadhead. 
Often what is thought to be double lung is only one lung.  Maybe back of a lung and liver.
But still, should be a dead animal.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: tzolk on November 03, 2020, 11:48:56 AM
The first deer I shot was with a VPA 2 blade. Never found a blood trail but went looking for him a little bit after I hit him and lucky found him 100 yards in the willows. Sure wasn't razor sharp either but it got him.

My last 2 deer I used Abowyers. One was a Bonehead and the other a Grizzly. Weird thing, and I really can't complain but when I shot these two deer, one was 15 yards and may have got his heart, it was right where you want to hit em and after the arrow struck, the arrow must have went upward behind his neck and hit the spinal cord because he dropped when he stood and died within a minute.

My third buck with the Abowyer Grizzly, I hit him from about 12 feet away, right in the bread box and he dropped right where he stood too. Both were ground shots with me standing. Weirdest thing! I wonder if both of those arrows were redirected upward into the spinal cord. I heard a loud thwack on the last one but he was only like 12 feet away so he got the full power of the bow. No pass throughs on the last two. Was lucky enough to not have to need a blood trail.
Now I'm shooting vpa 3 blades. My buddy shot 2 blades and we never could find his deer. Plenty of blood though. I'm sure that was his shot placement error though, from a tree stand.
Switching to 3 blades will hopefully give me more chance for a blood trail now that we are back in michigan with a lot less wild land to roam.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Mike Bolin on November 03, 2020, 01:45:33 PM
I have shot three deer with single bevel heads. On the first two deer, I had a complete pass thru with what I would  call a very minimal blood trail and in the case of the second deer it was more like non-existent. after the hit both ran less that 50 yards and dropped in sight. The third deer was hit quartering away, hitting what appeared to be liver and lung. Knowing that I'd hit liver and thinking only one lung, I backed out and waited 6 hours.
My wife (who sees blood better than anyone I know), a good friend (who is an excellent tracker) and I went to the sight of the hit and found one tiny drop of blood. This was expected as the arrow didn't penetrate completely. Rather than wander around the woods aimlessly I brought in a guy with a Lab that had found wounded deer before. Found nothing.
Overall, my experience with single bevel heads has been mixed. I am shooting 3 blades again. Had a hard quartering away shot on a doe last Saturday with a similar hit as on the deer I lost. She ran 20 yards or less from the site of the hit, stood for a few seconds and dropped over dead. VPA 3 blade with a complete pass thru and arrow stuck in the ground.
There are so many variables when it comes to blood trails and what what we "think" we see. Deer can react so quickly that it doesn't even register to us. If I were to hunt BIG game (Moose) I would probably opt for a 2 blade again just to try to insure maximum penetration. For deer sized game I plan to stick with the VPA/Woodsmen type 3 blade.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Kelly on November 03, 2020, 03:00:16 PM
3 blade creates a hole, two blade a slit. The latter can be closed over by muscle tissue/skin from the movement of the deer.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: JohnV on November 03, 2020, 04:29:06 PM
I have killed a lot of deer with 2 blade double bevel, 3 blade, and 2 blade single bevel. In general, penetration and blood trails are better with my single bevel Abowyer Wapiti broadheads. Are your broadheads shaving sharp? What about shot placement?
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 03, 2020, 04:40:52 PM
3 blade creates a hole, two blade a slit. The latter can be closed over by muscle tissue/skin from the movement of the deer.
Maybe but a three blade makes a little hole.  A wide cut two blade makes a gaping gash.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Sam McMichael on November 03, 2020, 04:58:40 PM
I readily admit that I do not understand the science behind the cutting ability of one broadhead as compared to another, but I have a pretty fair understanding of sharp. How is it that a head that is shaving sharp does not seem to cut as well as another head that is also shaving sharp? A slice is a slice, isn't it? Hopefully, somebody can explain why there seems to be a more effective cut from the double bevel than the single bevel. I have no experience with the single edge broadheads, so this thread fascinates me. I'll stay with my Magnus and Razorheads.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: JohnV on November 03, 2020, 05:34:10 PM
Yes, I have an explanation. The broad heads did not hit in the same location. Both double and single bevel broadheads will perform well if they hit the heart -lung area.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Doug in MN on November 03, 2020, 06:35:33 PM
Have used Grizzly's off and on for a long time have had them leave profuse blood trails, have had them leave iffy blood trails, with good hits heart lung area.
I will only use them now if build some Hog arrows. I really like 3 blade BH's and am back to Snuffers they have never left anything other than, a crap don't slip in all that, kind of a blood trail for me. They are short blood trails as well, short blood trails are good blood trails sooner to the pan.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Bisch on November 03, 2020, 10:49:02 PM
Idk what causes it, but sometimes blood trail just suck for inexplicable reasons. I shot this doe:



last Sunday morning. The shot was a complete passthru with perfect placement. You can see the entrance hole in that pic. Exit hole was in the other side in exactly the same place. The broadhead was a 1.5” wide German Kinetic 2-blade(double bevel), and I never found a single drop of blood between where she was shot and where she piled up. She only went about 40yds, so was easy to find.

As far as single bevels go, I don’t care for them because I can’t sharpen them well. For that reason, I have no actual hunting experience with them.

Bisch

Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: SlowBowinMO on November 09, 2020, 12:09:23 PM
I prefer single bevels on my two blades simply because I can get them sharper than anything else.  Blood trails have been slightly better than double bevel two blades from what I can remember.  I'd suspect the lack of blood trails experienced by some is simply due to dumb bad luck.  Some can't sharpen a single bevel either and shouldn't use one if they can't.

The single bevel advantage really doesn't come into play unless you are talking about heavy game or you intend to shoot whitetails in the shoulder.  :saywhat:  I mostly shoot 3 blades at whitetails these days as a result.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Overspined on November 11, 2020, 10:25:13 AM
Get em scalpel sharp...pic is worth a 1000 words. I’ve never had a problem with blood trails once they’re correctly sharp. Not trying to start an argument but I’ve shot all my deer for 30 years with them. I usually don’t need to even track em. From my first deer at 15 years old with a 44# longbow at 1/2 draw to deer dressing 240# in Illinois.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Overspined on November 11, 2020, 10:42:22 AM
I readily admit that I do not understand the science behind the cutting ability of one broadhead as compared to another, but I have a pretty fair understanding of sharp. How is it that a head that is shaving sharp does not seem to cut as well as another head that is also shaving sharp? A slice is a slice, isn't it? Hopefully, somebody can explain why there seems to be a more effective cut from the double bevel than the single bevel. I have no experience with the single edge broadheads, so this thread fascinates me. I'll stay with my Magnus and Razorheads.

That’s a valid point. It’s basically a factor of a couple of things, but one of them is the acuity of the angle of sharpening. So a shaving sharp axe isn’t going to slice quite like a scalpel, but both are sharp.  And any deer shot in vital areas should die, I’ve shot so many deer with 3 blade, expanding heads, 2 blade, single bevel....the way the single bevel twist and cork screw through, in addition to the acuity of the sharpening angle, might help explain why there seems to be some difference...I don’t know if anything could really definitively test any of these theories on living animals, but Ashby’s penetration tests have been the most comprehensive testing we have to reference at this point to my knowledge.   I just have happened to have used the 2 blade Griz single bevels since I started with longbows in like ‘91 other than the ones I’ve killed with wheels... one other thing is that to keep durability of the angle and the head, the steel needs to be able to handle the highly acute sharpening angle without dulling or breaking. My personal experience is that everything got better after I read Ashby’s results and implemented his sharpening recommendations. 
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Horsehide on November 11, 2020, 11:15:47 AM
Reading this post made me realize most of my bow kills were done with single-bevel heads. The others were brought down with 190gr Ribteks modified to have a Hill profile in the way Tom Mussatto showed me.
Not sure of the angle on these heads, but all were extremely sharp. Blood trails were seldom impressive, but most game either dropped in sight or only went under a hundred yard. My limited experience does not point to single-bevel being much better, as long as I do my part with proper shot placement.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 11, 2020, 07:38:21 PM
I've been thinking about this a lot since I posted and have concluded that maybe you should play the odds based on the type of shot you most frequently make on deer.

For example if you are an excellent shot and maybe tend to hit a little forwards maybe a smaller single bevel would be your choice.

On the other hand if you're somewhat of an average shot and tend to hit a little farther back maybe a 3 blade or wide 2 blade would be a better choice.

And perhaps maybe a middle ground between the two would be a durable 3 blade like a VPA.

I myself am somewhat of an average shooter. I've made good shots and plenty of bad ones too. And I get the dudes that say "well if you'd just make a good shot none of this matters".
None of us are trying to make "bad" shots, which was what I said in my original post that I thought the shots my father and I had made this year were good or at least decent and the outcomes were bad so I think it's natural to put some blame on the head we were using whether that's fair or not.

I really enjoyed everyone's responses.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Joeabowhunter on November 11, 2020, 08:15:18 PM
It's all too common to hear how great the broadhead is when successful and how bad the broadhead is when unsuccessful.  You can read thread after thread on this topic here and on other archery sites.  I have had great blood trails with every head you've mentioned and I've also had poor blood trails with the same heads.  A perfect double lung with a low exit will leave you a great blood trail every time.  Unfortunately, it's impossible to be perfect every time.  Choose the broadhead that you are confident in, make it sharp and go hunting.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: dragonheart on November 11, 2020, 08:22:32 PM
I went back to VPA 3 blade broadheads and I have encountered the great results I got in the past.  I cannot sharpen the single bevel broadhead to a satisfaction level I like, that is the key to any broadhead.  I shoot glue on VPA with an adaptor, no screw in for me.  Shoot thru's and great-great trails.
I never got that with single bevel broadheads, but I was also shooting wood arrows and got less penetration due to the arrow shaft breaking in the animal with single bevels.  Get them sharp no matter what design...and avoid anything mechanical.     
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: tracker12 on November 11, 2020, 08:46:51 PM
Really had to blame/judge the  performance of a BH on a deer that was not recovered.  Only fair on recoveries where the hit is documented and internal damage can be determined.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 11, 2020, 10:12:29 PM
Really had to blame/judge the  performance of a BH on a deer that was not recovered.  Only fair on recoveries where the hit is documented and internal damage can be determined.
I'd say there were plenty of replies about recovered animals with poor blood trails as well. 
There are also plenty of pics and stories every season where well shot animals not only survived but were shot and killed the second time a hunter got the opportunity.  So just because an animal wasn't recovered doesn't necessarily mean a bad shot.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: hessian on November 13, 2020, 01:22:53 PM
Take heed that I’ve only shot one animal with a single bevel Grizzly and that was yesterday...but for what it’s worth, it was a double lung (from the ground) arrow penetrated to the fletching and broke as he ran. Minimal blood trail but he died in about 40-50 yards.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Overspined on November 13, 2020, 04:33:12 PM
I don’t know how everyone else is doing it, but I’ve resorted to using a Paper sharpening wheel Which also comes with The strop wheel. I basically practiced on an old head or two until I get the hang of it, now when I’m done sharpening those heads they’re devastatingly sharp, and my blood trails show it. I used to use the file techniques and never had even close to the same results. I have hit high double lung where the blood trail was hard to follow because it was like a sprinkler out both sides, It would get confusing on which way the deer was actually going there was so much blood. A few years ago I hit one high in the loin and had no trouble tracking it almost half mile, it just took a bit to pick up the initial blood trail And I ended up catching up to it and seeing it was not going to die from that wound so far as I could tell. The first many deer I shot with grizzlies had poor blood trails but they were also not nearly as sharp as I get them now. I shot a deer with a four blade stinger the other day double bevel right through the heart and it was not an easy blood trail to follow, not really easy and not really hard. So I don’t know I think sharpness is the biggest factor, and I’ve had such great luck with grizzlies I just keep using them unless I need some thing where a grizzly won’t fit the weight or whatever exactly I’m looking for at the time or I don’t have any sharp ones laying around.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Overspined on November 13, 2020, 04:36:38 PM
All that being said, when somebody is either new or not experienced in sharpening, I always get them into stingers or replaceable blade broadheads of some sort and I don’t even bring up the fact that they exist LOL I think they take a lot of time to get right and I’d rather see people use sharp heads than get frustrated
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 13, 2020, 05:41:33 PM
The wheels do an awesome job.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: David Phillips on November 13, 2020, 09:12:07 PM
I’ve been on many blood trails two, three and four blades the number one defining difference in blood on the ground was sharpness not number of blades. I think everyone has a different interpretation of sharp or scary sharp. Kinda like when your buddy  says his bow is whisper quiet and when you watch him shoot it sounds like someone slammed a car door? A lot of people get their broadheads sharp enough to shave a little and call it good some take it to the next level with a strop etc. Some start with a sharp head but fail to maintain the edge through the season. I shot this doe this evening with a Grizzly file sharpened then wet stoned then a leather strop. Sharp enough to make you pay attention when you handle it. And I check and retouch the edges frequently.
    The blood trail pics are about average this doe went 50 yards had blood like this every few feet all the way to her.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Overspined on November 14, 2020, 09:38:48 AM
Very nice David. I agree with sharpness being the key. It seems to be the most important thing in actual blood on the ground. There are a lot of crappy broadheads that are sharp, and work, but they just don’t lay down the blood. I have tracked so many deer over the years and the heads that slice the best seem to make them bleed the best.

I shot under a cow elk a few years back and the griz nicked the back of her calf on the front leg. 1/2 a day later I picked up that blood trail a mile from where that happened.  She went down the mountain, across, and back up. I happened across a trail she took..still leaving blood. Sucked but definitely slices and dices.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Kevin Dill on November 15, 2020, 03:27:30 PM
This is what I like about the SBBs I hunt with:

Two days ago I killed this buck. He was following other deer but cutting a somewhat erratic path through the timber toward my stand. He veered away, then slanted back toward my position. As he walked broadside in front of me at 8 or 9 yards I brought the arrow back and JUST as I reached anchor...he did a combination sidestep and left angle. It was too late as my brain had just seen the lights go green and the shot was gone. The arrow slammed into his upper back and severed the spinal cord, then entered the upper chest. He went down like he'd been pole-axed and laid still just long enough for me to administer the coup de grace for insurance.

(https://i.imgur.com/ZDlCaKEl.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/BjjGKu6l.jpg)

This was with a 55# longbow and Victory shaft carrying lots of weight up front. You can guess the weight like I did, but I'll assure you he's well north of 225# and built like a brick. The broadhead came out undamaged and will get redeployed for its third deer eventually.That's another deer that had the best of all bloodtrails....the one you don't need.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Zwickey-Fever on November 15, 2020, 04:43:38 PM
 "In my experience", I tried single bevel broadheads in 2015. I learned how to sharpen them in the Spring time and started practicing after work on a daily basis. I was truly amazed how accurate they was. Fast forward to opening day here in Iowa. I decided to take a big mature doe as she made her way towards me. She came completely broadside at 12 yards, I drew back, hit my anchor, picked a spot and released. My arrow hit exactly where I was aiming. I watched the doe take a few leaps and bounds, then walk off as if nothing. I watched her through my binos make her way down to the creek bottom and lay down. I sat there watching her for about 10-12 minutes before I lost sight of her. I got down after a hour and made my way to my arrow that was stuck in the ground covered in blood. I was curious about what kind of blood trail would await me as I started making my way in the direction the doe took. And besides at the point of impact, I could not find a spec of blood to save my life! I really searched. I found her prints but no blood. I made my way to where I seen her bed down, and there I seen a small amount of blood but not her. I went down across the creek and found her up on the other side piled up about 90-100 yards away from where I shot her. I was really careful when I was gutting her because I wanted to check out what the damage the single bevel broadhead has done. there was plenty of blood in the chest cavity. I went through both lungs just behind the heart but there was no "S" wound channeling like I heard so much about.
  About a week later, I arrowed a heavy antler ten pointer that I never recovered due to the lack of blood on the ground. I hit him quartering away from a deer stand that was 14 feet off the ground. found my arrow about 20 yards from where I shot him, covered in blood. I found very very little blood out to about 150 yards to where it trickled off. I took off a day of work and really looked along with several friends without luck.
  After that experience, I went back to my Zwickey Deltas. The very next buck I shot was a eight pointer that field dressed out at 235lbs. Shot him at 18 yards and he only made it about 28-30 yards before dropping. The blood trail was unreal. So for me, the single bevel is only a gimmick. I will never use them again. I shoot the biggest broadhead Zwickey offers. Keep it simple, bigger the hole, the more blood on the ground.
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 15, 2020, 05:35:35 PM
That's a good buck Kevin.  But I'm pretty sure the type of bevel on the broadhead had less to do with the length and amount of blood to track than a fortune circumstance. 😉
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: buckeyebowhunter on November 15, 2020, 10:17:27 PM
Great buck Kevin  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Orion on November 16, 2020, 03:00:53 PM
I've only killed a few deer with single bevel heads -- Abowyer Wapitis -- and can't say the blood trail was any less than any other well hit deer I've taken.  Certainly they were sufficient to lead me to tghe deer quite easily. 

I agree with Ryan. If the broadhead is truly sharp, the biggest determinator of blood trail on a good hit is the size of the head, with multiple blades an additive factor.  Of course, a dull head or poor hit, and all bets are off.

I got to wondering though.  If the single bevels truly do cut an S shape wound, kind of making a circle or two as it goes through the animal, might that make it easier for internal tissue to block the wound channel and reduce the blood escaping the wound.  Don't know. It's one plausible explanation.

I still think the biggest reason for poor blood trails are poor hits and dull broadheads.   
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Bisch on November 16, 2020, 03:13:31 PM
I can’t explain what makes a critter not bleed out well? Last month, I shot this doe with a 1.5” wide, sharp enough to easily shave hair, German Kinetic broadhead.

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

You can see the placement and shot angle in the pic. The deer made it about 100yds, and there was not a visible spot of blood anywhere from shot site to the place where she expired! There was massive blood on the ground where she died. I expected to follow a crimson path to my deer, and ended up doing circle patterns till I found her. I have no explanation?????

Bisch
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: Ryan Rothhaar on November 16, 2020, 04:03:32 PM
Bisch, I think someone else mentioned it earlier, I've had heart shot deer not leave a good blood trail, seems like if you do massive damage to the heart the ticker can shut off and stop pumping. Had this happen a couple of times with big Snuffers.

R
Title: Re: Initial impression of single bevel heads
Post by: GCook on November 16, 2020, 05:37:49 PM
Buddy shot an oryx the other day.  300 grain Tuffhead.  Went in straight up and down between two ribs.  Came out up and down between two ribs. 
It must not have gotten the memo about that.
The gimmick stuff is something I don't count on.  But razor slick sharp heads are deadly.  That's what I should control.