Trad Gang
Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Ray Lyon on December 26, 2019, 03:16:48 PM
-
I have worn contacts for years however they are a pain sometimes to deal with. I am wondering about going to a pair of eyeglasses for hunting only. My every day glasses are transition lens because they are bifocals. They also have a larger lens and even with a 58 inch recurve they bump the string because they stick out below the eye and are larger than my old glasses which are smaller but still transitions, however the transition points are closer together and require tilting head to find sweat spot. I’m wondering if anyone wears a bifocal normally and hunts with lens in a single prescription configuration?? I can’t see far away Without correction so I am thinking of having these eyeglasses only correct my distance vision and forgo the close-up which I don’t need for hunting. Anyone else in this situation??? If so how did you solve? Is there a brand of frames that you recommend, and did you have a problem with fogging up glasses if they are tight fitting to the face like a goggle ?
-
I have always hunted with bifocals.A single distance lens would be great I am sure.
Heres what I got that you might think about.
I wear Liberty sports/athletic glasses that are bifocal.I highly recommend these frames and glasses for hunting,fishing,biking,snowmobiling,sking and all sporting activities.
Their a wrap around frame that's very sporty and nice looking.Thier extremely strong.I have the transition lens so their great indoors or outdoors in any condition.I got scratch proof coating.Thier glare resistant.They have a strap that's easily adjustable and nose padd.Thier not too heavy.The wrap around frame is good for vision overall and peripheral vision is good.The part for close up vision is very small on the inside corner of the frame.So it does not get in the way really of my distance vision at all.I never notice it.Unless I need it.
I would recommend this style of frame with these features.I have had these glasses for years and basically wear them all the time.No problems at all.Very durable!!!very comfortable.
Whether you decide on the bifocal or not is your choice.The bifocal works for me perfectly and is more versatile overall.The distance only lens would be great as well I am sure.
-
I wear glasses but definitely not when shooting the bow. I have had the string hit them several times, and it SMARTS! Fortunately my vision is still good enough that I can shoot without glasses.
-
Eric, great comments. I have my annual eye exam in a week and I am trying to get all the ‘field advice’ to speak with my eye doctor with when I’m in for my check up. Their office does handle the Liberty line of glasses so that’s good information.
-
I have both. I Haven’t figured out how to shoot with the bifocals. They drive me crazy to wear them anyway. I shoot/hunt in single vision lenses. I have never had an issue with the glasses getting in the way but I’ve worn glasses for 40 years or so and have always been used to them. I do typically wear smaller frame.
-
59 yrs old here. Technically need transitions. Hated them. Went w single script for hunting. Many options even less than $50 on internet. I carry fold up readers just in case. They fold up 4 ways- so they are the size of a small stack of silver dollars. Lift glasses or look under bottom when blood trailing. Works for now
-
Ray, get a pair of larger rimless frames then the edges of the frame won't interfere with your site picture, Also get bi-focal not progressive so you don't get distortion in your side vision. Get the anti- reflective coating, helps with scratching. I don't have to wear glasses for hunting any longer, cataract surgery, amazing. good luck. Dan
-
Ray set the bi-focal as low on the lens that you feel comfortable with.
-
I've been wearing glasses for a long time and haven't had any problem with distortion or contact with the string. My glasses are rimless and relatively small progressive lenses. Yes, if you try to look sideways out of them, there will be some distortion. I consider that a plus. If I get distortion, it tells me I'm looking across the arrow rather than over/down it, and I reposition my head more toward the target as a result, getting a clear picture and eliminating left right misses (except for when I pluck :cheesy:)
One disadvantage, I can't wear a face mask over my nose, or even over my mouth, without fogging the glasses in cold weather. Otherwise, fogging isn't a problem.
-
I have shot with bifocal glasses in large plastic frames and wire frame as well with no negatives.
-
I wore glasses from age 11 until I was 58. I shot bow, rifle, shotgun and pistol wearing them. As my eyes aged I needed bifocals so I got a pair. First I darned near fell down the stairs then my arrows went every which way. I went back and got a pair for distance only. I got the “grandpa” wire frames. I was back on target, actually shot better.
-
I have worn glasses since 2002 (I am 72). They were no-line bifocal in the smaller lense size. I shoot 3 under and gun barrel the arrow. Never had any trouble except for occasional fogging when wearing a face mask but found a way to get around that. I also shot without the glasses some and it worked ok. I did have a pair of large lense rimless glasses made with the bifocal placed very low in the lense and the focal area enlarged and they worked fine for me.
I have had cataract surgery in the last two months and dont need glasses except for very fine reading so I guess I am good to go.
-
I just started wearing glasses full time in August. My first pair was single prescription with no bifocal. It drove me nuts having to switch between those and the readers every time I looked at something close or far away. I went back and got a 2nd pair with bifocals, and had them put the bifocal part as low as possible. I like that so much, I took my first pair back and had the bifocal added to them!!!!! And the bifocal part being real low does not get in the way of my shooting a bow at all!
Bisch
PS-Mine are the old fashioned lined bifocals
-
You might think you only need a single script for hunting, until something goes wrong with your equipment on stand that needs a close-up set of eyeballs on the job. I hunt with my everyday glasses (Varilux blended bifocal lenses) Took a while to adjust to them but would not go back to a single script lens.
-
Very high humidity in Florida pretty much year round. I use an anti fog treatment on my glasses regularly.
Reminds me...they're do for a re-treatment.
-
Have worn glasses since I was a kid in 4th grade. Have no issues with them at all, and do wear bifocals now.
-
Ok I don't shoot with my glasses on I too was having trouble with my bifocal I hated them but then my next pair I asked if they could put the reader part of my glasses below the centerline of my lenses this helped out a lot.
-
Hi Ray
I have been hunting with tri-vocals for a few years. You can adapt to most anything if you really try.
-
Eye doctor here, you’ll not find anything that performs like contacts will. Fogging, sliding, bifocal out of position, string catching the edge and throwing them 50yds away, lack of peripheral vision...just a myriad of disaster waiting to happen.
That said, there are good bifocal contact lenses out there that might be a good thing to try.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I have worn glasses for several years now, having to go to bi-focal within the last 4-5 years, I have progressive lenses. My issue is seeing up close. The last couple years I have been playing around with wearing them when I shoot, as the nock is a bit fuzzy when I'm putting it on the string. Depending on the bow I'm shooting I shoot either shoot split or three under and have no trouble with my frames hitting the string, I have medium sized framed glasses. I shoot ok with them on, but haven't yet dedicated myself to wearing them while hunting, I use binoculars a lot so it's a pain wearing them for hunting. I don't seem to have a problem with the progressive when shooting at targets, my problem is with my nose piece as I look at the target, but turning my head a bit takes care of that. Good luck.
Jason
-
Eye doctor here, you’ll not find anything that performs like contacts will. Fogging, sliding, bifocal out of position, string catching the edge and throwing them 50yds away, lack of peripheral vision...just a myriad of disaster waiting to happen.
That said, there are good bifocal contact lenses out there that might be a good thing to try.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since we have a professional on board I’ll expand my problem. I’m right eye dominant. With glasses on, the best I can correct my vision is 20/50 (L/R). The reason is that I have keratoconus. Essentially my right cornea has mountain ranges which distorts my vision. With hard lenses I can see 15/25, but I struggle with them being in for more than 3 to 4 hours. I’ve been using a newer style lense that has a hard lense encapsulated in a soft lense for my right eye. It doesn’t correct my vision as well and I’ve struggled with comfort (particles getting under them and tearing the edges of the lenses getting them out). With my left eye I can wear a simple disposable soft lense with no problems and perfect vision. The hard curve of the hard lense of a contact creates a smooth, undistorted surface to my right eye which allows me to see 15/25.
Medical description:
Because eyeglasses and soft contact lenses often cannot provide adequate visual acuity in cases of keratoconus, gas permeable contact lenses usually are the preferred treatment.
Back to my original question (and I will discuss all of this including any contact lense improvements which may have happened in the last year). I can shoot ‘accurately’ even with my distorted right eye in glasses. It’s not as good at longer distances as it is with my contacts but I can shoot to 20 yards well with glasses even though I bump my current ones with the string. I’m thinking the ease and comfort of glasses will be nicer that dealing with contacts for my right eye (wouldn’t even be discussing if I had two left eyes).
So there’s my full dilemma.
-
Here’s the problem. Keratoconus is just difficult. Strictly speaking, you don’t just need a rigid lens, you need a speciality rigid like a Rose-k (a design that’s old as dirt) or scleral lens that are steep enough that it actually vaults the top of the cone.
Hybrid lenses are way more comfortable, but as you’ve seen, the soft skirts are garbage.
If they’re uncomfortable, it’s most likely because the there’s too much bearing (the lens is putting pressure on the top of the cone). A good scleral lens is your best bet
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
👌
-
I've had glasses since about 10 (71 now) and bifocals for more than 20 yrs and shot fine with them, however I do have 2 pr 1 transition and 1 normal. I hunt with the normal because they give me clearer, better vision at first and last light and when there's snow on the ground everything is redder in color with transition lenses. I tried squirrel hunting in the winter and couldn't pick out squirrels lying tight to the limbs because of the color. Every one blended in to the trees.
-
I went away from glasses three years ago, had Lasic done specifically for an Elk hunt. Shot my best 3D score at that time, four days after surgery. Scott.
-
Surgery is not an option because of the Disease, however the doctor who specializes in it says my case is not so bad that I need a corneal transplant. So it’s a matter of finding the best correction that’s comfortable.
-
Surgery is not an option because of the Disease, however the doctor who specializes in it says my case is not so bad that I need a corneal transplant. So it’s a matter of finding the best correction that’s comfortable.
Corneal transplants are the “easiest” of the transplants, but you really want to wait until you’re uncorrectable. I’ve seen a few “textbook” transplants that still end up with graft rejection and that’s no bueno and even without that, the visual recovery is a slow process.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I ran into the same problem years ago. I wear progressives normally but have a pair of older, larger aviator frames and I had my optician insert single vision lenses in them. At the very bottom, I had him put in the old style reading circles (like your father or grandpa used to have). Only way to go. You can now read, see your tree steps, bow's nocking point..... There is absolutely no blurry interference with your shooting. It's the only way to go. Trust me.
-
Ray.... Are you wearing 2 week extended contacts ???
-
Terry, in my left eye I wear a simple disposable contact. That eye has super easy slight correction and no kerataconus or stigmatism. My right eye is a hot mess with both stigmatized and kerataconus that I have been told takes the lenses as Maddog2020 describes to fix. I went to the skirted lense two years ago thinking that was going to be a great opportunity for more comfort and still correcting vision over my gas permeable versions. I think the sclera lense Maddog describes us newer technology and I will discuss with my optometrist about. As far as extended wear I’ve never used them and don’t know if they are an option that would work for my right eye (and I do a lot of computer work that tends to create less blinking and dries out lenses).
The bottom line is I’m going to discuss all the above at my appointment this Monday and try to get the best/most comfortable vision I can for 2020 (every pun intended!!😉)
-
As a side note I spoke with my wife’s cousin who’s a traditional archer and a rep for an eyeglass lab and has been in the business for many years. He indicated that progressive lenses may be the better way to go if the point of my arrow is used in my shooting process at all. Again, lots to consider and I sincerely appreciate all the suggestions here. I just saw an old picture of me and a friend elk hunting in the early 80’s in Crested Butte Colorado. I was shooting my 69” 86# Howard Hill longbow with no worries about string interference or glasses. It was in my mid twenties when attending Michigan State University that I noticed I couldn’t read stuff on the projector screen unless I sat in front of the room. Vision has gone downhill since. (And so have my draw weights!!😆)
-
Terry, in my left eye I wear a simple disposable contact. That eye has super easy slight correction and no kerataconus or stigmatism. My right eye is a hot mess with both stigmatized and kerataconus that I have been told takes the lenses as Maddog2020 describes to fix. I went to the skirted lense two years ago thinking that was going to be a great opportunity for more comfort and still correcting vision over my gas permeable versions. I think the sclera lense Maddog describes us newer technology and I will discuss with my optometrist about. As far as extended wear I’ve never used them and don’t know if they are an option that would work for my right eye (and I do a lot of computer work that tends to create less blinking and dries out lenses).
The bottom line is I’m going to discuss all the above at my appointment this Monday and try to get the best/most comfortable vision I can for 2020 (every pun intended!!
)
This is kind of long, but this is to give folks an understanding of what these guys are dealing with:
Not a lot of doctors fit scleral lenses, it’s kind of a specialty thing. Just wanted to warn you.
The really frustrating thing about Keratoconus is that when the cornea gets to the “hot mess” stage, glasses just aren’t that useful and getting a good prescription is sort of a process after contacts are fit.
For those that don’t have it, keratoconus is a progressive disease of the cornea where there is an isolated area of thinning which causes the pressure behind the cornea to push that area out (like pushing a balloon with your finger from the inside) with the result being an elevated “cone” on the front of the eye that both distorts the vision, creates some irregular astigmatism AND makes glasses largely useless.
The process is that you do the eye exam which gets you a ballpark prescription (sometimes it‘a a tee ball size park, sometimes it’s Wrigley Field) and the curvature of the eye. Someone equipped to manage it will utilize a corneal topographer that makes a detailed elevation map of the front of the eye that measures all of the irregularity and most importantly, the elevation of the “cone” that keratoconus causes and then a lab custom designs a lens based on that map.
After the lens comes in, it’s put on the eye and evaluated for how it fits (if it pushes too much on that cone, it’ll actually make it worse) and then you do another prescription with the contact on which might be totally different and you then add those numbers to the original contact lens! You generally go through a few lenses as you refine the fit and prescription.
How the lenses work (and why soft ones don’t work) is that the rigid lens sits making very light contact with the tip of the cone “vaulting” the rest of the cornea. Tears fill in that space between the lens and the cornea creating a much more regular optical surface and allows the image that usually hits the cornea and just scatters to focus more precisely and therefore correctable.
Most middle aged or older keratoconus patients wear both those expensive contacts AND glasses over them because once you make the eye correctable, you then have to deal with the normal “over 40’s” issue of not being able to read close any longer. Most of the time, I’ll end up with those custom lenses AND a pair of progressive lenses. It’s an expensive proposition no matter how you slice it, but damn it, a man HAS to be able to see!
Really everything involved in the process is a hot mess. The cornea, the vision, the process, the cost involved...the works.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Wow....thx for the education Maddog!!!
-
I read this thread as I struggle with glasses both at work and hunting. But after reading this thread I've learned my "struggles" aren't really struggles at all but slight inconveniences. Good luck with finding something that works for you! Wishing you the best.
-
Wow....thx for the education Maddog!!!
No problemo. It’s a complicated condition both to have as a patient and to manage as a doctor, so I figured it might be helpful to folks wanting to offer suggestions. Hard to offer useful input if you don’t understand!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I read this thread as I struggle with glasses both at work and hunting. But after reading this thread I've learned my "struggles" aren't really struggles at all but slight inconveniences. Good luck with finding something that works for you! Wishing you the best.
I’m glad you said that. It’s a great lesson in the old “I lamented not having any shoes until I met a man with no feet” saying! I suppose the same can be said for those with keratoconus because I deal on a daily basis with people that are truly functionally blind, so I guess there’s a silver lining everywhere.
One of my biggest resolutions for 2020 is to be more grateful. Grateful for my job, my family, my health (whatever the state of it), grateful for having archery and friends here to share it with...a lot of stuff that always seems to take a backseat to whatever I feel like I DON’T have.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Thank you for the reply, your professional advice is welcome and appreciated. Yes I have experienced the squishing of the cone with the hard lenses. Of course I can see better with the gas permeable hard lens that fits properly. The optometrist I visit is a large practice and they do have the topography technology and they also have a MD that specializes in Kerataconus . After she assessed my condition she referred me to one of the optometrist for fitting and annual care. My old optometrist (retired) who was actually very good and discovered my condition years before it was In most optometrist radars sent me to a large practice 200 miles away in the big city to have the topography done and confirmed his suspicions. The current medical doctor compared to topographies over the years and determined that it is pretty slow growing right now. So at this point I am just trying to find the best and most comfortable solution. I’ve understood for a long time but this is not an easy fix for The professionals. Thus I am patient and understanding. I’ll report back what I find and what solution I try.
-
Thank you for the reply, your professional advice is welcome and appreciated. Yes I have experienced the squishing of the cone with the hard lenses. Of course I can see better with the gas permeable hard lens that fits properly. The optometrist I visit is a large practice and they do have the topography technology and they also have a MD that specializes in Kerataconus . After she assessed my condition she referred me to one of the optometrist for fitting and annual care. My old optometrist (retired) who was actually very good and discovered my condition years before it was In most optometrist radars sent me to a large practice 200 miles away in the big city to have the topography done and confirmed his suspicions. The current medical doctor compared to topographies over the years and determined that it is pretty slow growing right now. So at this point I am just trying to find the best and most comfortable solution. I’ve understood for a long time but this is not an easy fix for The professionals. Thus I am patient and understanding. I’ll report back what I find and what solution I try.
Best of luck!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Phase 1 complete.
1) getting a pair of glasses (Nike) with single script and very small bifocal section down low. These will be for shooting sessions and other sporting activity. My current guy is having me see another in his practice that specializes in Sclera contacts (he specializes in gas permeable/hybrid). My fallback will be gas permeable if Sclera doesn’t feel good. He did say in my case if Sclera works for me it would give best results. One of the most gracious medical professionals I’ve worked with for sure.
-
And as a side note there has been no changes in my topography in the last 3 years so that’s bee very stable. 🙏🙏👍👍
-
Phase 1 complete.
1) getting a pair of glasses (Nike) with single script and very small bifocal section down low. These will be for shooting sessions and other sporting activity. My current guy is having me see another in his practice that specializes in Sclera contacts (he specializes in gas permeable/hybrid). My fallback will be gas permeable if Sclera doesn’t feel good. He did say in my case if Sclera works for me it would give best results. One of the most gracious medical professionals I’ve worked with for sure.
That guy sounds great! I agree with him that if you can find a comfortable scleral, your vision will be better than a garden variety gas permeable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I"ll only wear single vision glasses for distance while hunting. If I could wear contacts I would use them for hunting especially when its cold.
-
Well the process is moving forward. A few days ago the first try at the Sclera lens came in. I got the lens in (which is tricky because it is like a big ol saucer. I had to wait in the interim waiting room with view of outside woods for twenty minutes while my eye settled in with the new lens. Even from the start the world looked different (my glasses were off so my left eye was not corrected but it’s a pretty mild and straight forward correction). I was seeing details of tree branches instead of shapes of trees. When I went back in exam room the doctor was pretty pleased with fit but she wanted a remake so it would fit a little better. She said that would probably correct my vision even more and provide a little more comfort (and it was already very comfortable). The best news—-I was already at 20/30 with the first tryin lense. I wore it today cross country skiing and then with readers to play cribbage and then after 6 hours in down to the indoor shooting range. My first shot at ten yards was 5 inches to the right (right eye dominance and that’s the bad eye). It’s crazy to think that’s how much ‘off’ I am because of the 20/80 vision I have with the best glasses can correct me. Then I was getting this
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Still slightly right but my shot was more natural feeling and quicker because I was not playing games with my sight picture. I get 90 days no additional cost for lenses from lab until doctor feels it is right. So if nothing else I already have a free backup. This is such an amazing feeling and doctor feels I should get up to 16 hours of comfort wear per day, so a long hunting day is no longer an issue.
I really need to thank Maddog20/20 for his advice and encouragement as I’m so pleased I went down this trail. And of course my other doctor in the practice came out while I was in interim waiting area and talked with me and asked how it was feeling so far. Genuinely interested in getting best vision and he gave me two thumbs up when I was leaving and heard the good news. With practice I’m sure the insertion will go smoothly but other than that little nuance I’m pleased as punch.