Trad Gang

Main Boards => The Bowyer's Bench => Topic started by: joebuck on July 27, 2018, 09:58:29 AM

Title: Bow Physics revisited.....Bow Finished!
Post by: joebuck on July 27, 2018, 09:58:29 AM
In 1988....I read instinctive shooting.... G Fred explained the mystery for me on how to shoot a trad Bow.....Split finger, burn a hole, follow through. I was off to the races for many years shooting a similar style..............................2018...either Jason W writings  and/or that "pushpod segment"".........I am a Crawl convert....not looking back... Mr . Quillian if still alive would scold the HELL out of me...but... this system works for me...cant wait to shoot a critter out of my Guido saddle!

enough for my background..........Since 1992...my basic TD recurve bow building has been locate the center of riser then go 1.5" up and cut my radius  shelf....Now i am gripping the string , 3 fingers, low wrist  and the arrow is 1" above my fingers for 'crawl" or "walk".......................

So long winded.....are any of you setting your risers and or limbs up different for the crawl?  I know archers have been string walking since maurice and will but now center of bow is 3.5" above nocked arrow.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: joebuck on July 27, 2018, 12:31:38 PM
Too much heavy thinking on design  :dunno: when i should be solving on tiller board. Just focus with tiller on board so both limbs are timed together with new grip and shooting setup
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: Mark Smeltzer on July 27, 2018, 01:49:28 PM
I'll be watching this one. I don't string walk or crawl..lol but have always pondered the the relationship between bow center, shelf placement and hand placement on the string. I build my bows with the shelf at 1.250  above center.
When I think about this stuff i throw in tiller also just to further confuse the issue. Even tiller or positive. On primitive bows some guys make the bottom limb shorter too. :dunno:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: kennym on July 27, 2018, 01:51:54 PM
"" now center of bow is 3.5" above nocked arrow ""



That seems like the bow center would be way too high? :dunno:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: joebuck on July 27, 2018, 01:57:47 PM
correction....The arrow nock is about that ...3 to 3.5" high of where my pressure is on the grip ( base of thumb)

Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: joebuck on July 27, 2018, 02:13:25 PM
i think on this bow i am going to attach riser to tiller board holder to exactly the place my grip pressure is by base of my thumb would be ( not center of throat of grip), then attach pulley rope to exactly where top of my index finger for three under would be................then tiller limbs accordingly....not jack with making one limb short or riser catawambpus...etc........................

Kenny, you up to making lams out of all this persimmon?  big boards are 2x12x8' :biglaugh:

Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: Bvas on July 27, 2018, 02:39:06 PM
You want to attach the rope where center of your middle finger would be. This should be the focal point of your drawing hand.

Tillering for string walking, I’d imagine that you would want to attach slightly lower than that. Just guessing??
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: kennym on July 27, 2018, 03:37:57 PM
i think on this bow i am going to attach riser to tiller board holder to exactly the place my grip pressure is by base of my thumb would be ( not center of throat of grip), then attach pulley rope to exactly where top of my index finger for three under would be................then tiller limbs accordingly....not jack with making one limb short or riser catawambpus...etc........................

Kenny, you up to making lams out of all this persimmon?  big boards are 2x12x8' :biglaugh:

Any number!!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: Roy from Pa on July 27, 2018, 04:57:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z3TIPS4zg4
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: stickmonkey on July 29, 2018, 09:17:06 AM
I would first try just tillering the limbs to the fixed crawl so the bow appears like the one in Roys pic.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: EwokArcher on July 29, 2018, 02:41:45 PM
Nice rowing machine you have there Roy, I am sure your  PT would be glad to see that vid too lol.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: Roy from Pa on July 29, 2018, 08:29:32 PM
LOL

That's not me.

I have hair..

 :laughing:

Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: kennym on July 29, 2018, 09:24:25 PM
I wuz gonna say somethin but I figgered I just be quiet.... :bigsmyl:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: Roy from Pa on July 30, 2018, 04:34:41 AM
Yer getting mellow there ole timer.
 :laughing:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....what are your thoughts?
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 09:04:15 AM
Here’s the real question.   Why do we set up our riser (TD) typically with the center of riser typically in the throat of the grip when the proper grip pressure point is base of thumb which is 1" +lower?   In picture , i am showing the Blue dot is relative position of that base thumb with horizontal stick showing typical center ( mathematical center of my riser)   

I am thinking if I  lengthen the lower riser to make blue dot exact center of bow ( where now the throat of grip is the center) This would line up all three.....mathmatical center of the bow with the pressure point of correct grip and in line with my three fingers under?
 


Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: EwokArcher on August 01, 2018, 09:44:25 AM
The lower position of the thumb rotates the hand and forearm into a more pronated position. This straightens out the bow arm and makes it more in line with the arrow which is more beneficial for instinctive shooting. A trad hill style handle would have your thumb high and heel of the hand planted in the bow. I've been shooting with a straight wrist and have been making my handles with the lower thumb and higher palm swell to encourage this. This puts the pressure in the webbing of the hand at the center of the bow.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 10:59:08 AM
I am wondering if Olympic re curves lower limbs are longer than top limbs?
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: EwokArcher on August 01, 2018, 12:04:26 PM
I don't know about Olympic bows. But from making wood bows you learn a lot more about tiller that tends to get bypassed with glass bows.  I think the limb length isn't as critical as even stress between the limbs. I made a hand full of asym osage bows and other than being more trouble they shot no better than a normal properly tillered design. When making wood bows I would use a mirror or camera and draw the bow by hand to more exactly replicate the proper pressure through the limbs to fine tune tiller. I am no expert I'm sure someone has less anecdotal input.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mark Smeltzer on August 01, 2018, 12:13:25 PM
(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k100/Bowmakr/Yumi_zpsa27sf5bs.jpeg) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/Bowmakr/media/Yumi_zpsa27sf5bs.jpeg.html)

I guess they build the Yumi bow the way it is for a reason. If you figure it out let me know. :biglaugh:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 12:16:10 PM
Now that pic gave me a headache    :banghead:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: EwokArcher on August 01, 2018, 12:40:58 PM
I'm pretty sure yumis were for horse back archery correct? I may be missing the mark but that is a good example mark. When I was about 16 I tried to make an osage Yumi. 76 inches long about an inch wide more hand shock than a jack hammer lol I think I missed the whole limb timing weight distribution thing on that one.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 01:51:20 PM
Jim Thorne Has conducted a lot of experiments in relation to grip position to  center or below centerline of the bow. Jim found for split finger being slightly below center preformed best and for 3 under having the center of the grip on the center of the riser worked well. Keep in mind too that Jim like most of us also dynamic tillers the limbs no mater the position of the grip. Having the limbs balanced and timed at draw is more important than grip position IMHO.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 02:10:35 PM
Jim wrote

I suggest that you build your bows as symmetrical as possible coming off the form, tiller them as a perfectly balanced bow out to about 20″ draw (pushing at center and pulling at center), then adjust the bow pivot position and string pulling position to match the intended shooter, and then finish tillering the bow out to full draw so the tips pull to the same distance. I think you’ll find that sliding the bow pivot up or down during the tillering process will result in a more balanced bow and limbs that are closer together in strength. What you end up is essentially a bow with equal length limbs and an asymmetrical riser. It works for compound and target bow manufacturers

Wow!!!!!!!  Jim's webpage answered all my questions..........i hope he is right  :bigsmyl:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 02:32:27 PM
Am i reading this right.....he says in this example....right side is upper limb. Last sentence says that making lower limb ( left limb) stronger would even tiller this bow out?  seems backwards

 :dunno:


Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 02:43:35 PM
Now this scenario seems exactly what i was asking...

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]  
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 03:59:55 PM
Am i reading this right.....he says in this example....right side is upper limb. Last sentence says that making lower limb ( left limb) stronger would even tiller this bow out?  seems backwards

 :dunno:




Yes that is correct.  More stress is placed on the lower limb as you move your hand down down the riser so keeping the left side 1/8" positive will aid it. A single point string drawing will not put the same forces on the string as the hand does however it does well enough that unless you want to go through the trouble to make a griping device that will mimic the pressures the fingers apply a little better. I made one a few years ago and still use it but again the gains from using it are very small. That said I am of the mindset of adding up all the little small performance eeks will eventually show bigger gains. I do those thing strictly for my own OCD.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 04:07:26 PM
Now this scenario seems exactly what i was asking...




No surprise here. Its an asymmetrical design with both the grip and pull point being 1" Below the center of the string and bow. I am understanding that your asking about tilling to a crawl which is above the center by a few inches. The thing is you dont know the crawl till you tiller and shoot the bow so in the end its just a guess on tillering but if you dynamic tiller as we have suggested based on the drawing method it may help you make the bow quieter. in the end it may just be a wash on whats gained vs longevity of the bow.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 04:13:01 PM
Not really,   i place my hand on string for crawl exactly same place i have always for three under.  what i did move was the arrow up to under my eye   ...

I use to shoot 3 under with arrow right under my eye.......just never felt i had a solid anchor......moving to the crawl and placing my index in corner of my mouth while keeping the arrow still under my eye.............has been Awesome


Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 04:17:05 PM
So If I have two bows you are saying you will put your hand on the same place for both on your crawl? If that is so then your Crawl is not accurate unless both bows and the arrows are the exact same. If you build a new bow or tiller the limbs you have on an existing bow the limbs will lose poundage which will translate to a small loss of FPS. 

How high above the normal nocking point on the string is your new nocking point/Crawl?
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 04:25:37 PM
Not sure SM if i understand your question.......but my project is for my new bow i am building...havent built one in 5 years and/or since i have changed shooting styles. ..........i shot for 20 years high wrist and split instinctive..  The last 10 i have basically shot three under and sighted down arrow like a shotgun.........

Crawl "tick" bit me months ago and have decided to build a new bow and go to thinking about tiller and set up....my style has changed to low wrist, three under and dam carbon arrows!!  ...........

the bow i am currently shooting i made 15 years ago and adjusted 10 years ago to even tiller....i moved string knock up to accommodate crawl  and not really really shooting bullet holes in paper...I love the crawl setup so got to thinking......i want to set up my new bow to be a tack driver shooting the crawl technique
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 04:28:55 PM
I moved knock up about 1.25"....my arrow is right under my eye and my index is in corner of my mouth

Jim Thorne Fig. 11 and explanation is Exactly how my bow is set up now.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 04:33:17 PM
Not sure SM if i understand your question.......but my project is for my new bow i am building...havent built one in 5 years and/or since i have changed shooting styles. ..........i shot for 20 years high wrist and split instinctive..  The last 10 i have basically shot three under and sighted down arrow like a shotgun.........

Crawl "tick" bit me months ago and have decided to build a new bow and go to thinking about tiller and set up....my style has changed to low wrist, three under and dam carbon arrows!!  ...........

the bow i am currently shooting i made 15 years ago and adjusted 10 years ago to even tiller....i moved string knock up to accommodate crawl  and not really really shooting bullet holes in paper...I love the crawl setup so got to thinking......i want to set up my new bow to be a tack driver shooting the crawl technique

When you say crawl I think of a fixed crawl but that is a mistake on my end as you are not fixed?

I have been building all my bows for three under with even tiller and even center on the riser , center shot and using carbon arrows , micro dia  ta boot :) finding its quieter than tillered for split. Both are tillered in the same way Jim said so they are balanced at draw and timed to the gripping pressure on the riser.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 01, 2018, 04:35:37 PM
I moved knock up about 1.25"....my arrow is right under my eye and my index is in corner of my mouth

Jim Thorne Fig. 11 and explanation is Exactly how my bow is set up now.

In Jims fig 11 BOTH the grip center and string nocking point have been move down, not up. If you reverse that and move them both up then the top limb will need a little more strength to it to time correctly
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 01, 2018, 04:40:11 PM
Figure 11 , the grip and where he grabs the "String" have been moved down....my arrow is above where he grabs the string...so fine tuning will probably include the arrow shaft  since there is a slight download pressure on the string stroke to the nock :dunno:
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Bvas on August 01, 2018, 09:20:48 PM
Am i reading this right.....he says in this example....right side is upper limb. Last sentence says that making lower limb ( left limb) stronger would even tiller this bow out?  seems backwards

 :dunno:



The right limb is not bending more. The bow is tipping in the cradle towards the stronger limb.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 02, 2018, 09:07:24 AM
It appears that but......he used just a heavy parallel ( no riser) to better show the effects of his experiment
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: TradBowyer on August 02, 2018, 04:45:26 PM
My take is you have to separate glass bows and self bows. They are two different animals. Self bows are more critical of tillering and hand placement than glass bows are. For my glass bows I compromise by measuring center of the riser and routing out my hand placement under that point which puts my arrow a little above center. This is the best of all worlds for me. For selfbows I don't mess with fixed crawl or string walking. Most of mine end up being point on around 22-25 yards shooting 3 under anyway. And keep in mind bowlers have to make a bow to fit the masses. People complain now about prices can you imagine what they would cost if each bow was perfectly matched and tillered to each buyer? Lol
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Bowjunkie on August 02, 2018, 05:07:46 PM
Matching bows to archers' idioms isn't too difficult. I tiller selfbows, backed bows, glass bows, character bows, bows with one straight limb and one reflexed limb, all of em... all the same way, they're all dynamically balanced, and I expect the first arrow from each of them to shoot wonderfully. Truly dynamically balanced bows are inherently tuned... all you should have to worry about is arrow spine.

Bvas is absolutely correct. His bow/heavy parallel is tipping on the tree. Compare just the 'handle area' of both pics. It's tipping, I promise. Ya gotta be super careful and understanding of this, or your assessments surrounding dynamic balance will be wrong, usually completely converse of the truth, and any following efforts, misdirected.

If a bow on the tree is allowed to tip without resistance, the STRONGER limb(relative to the shooter's holds) will come down farther... and the hook on the string(string hand fulcrum) will generally always follow a plumb line straight down the wall. The key to this method is to adjust relative limb strength so that the bow isn't tipping at full draw.

On the other hand, if a bow on the tree is clamped or otherwise held so that the handle area stays level, the WEAKER limb will come down farther(relatively speaking again), and the string hand fulcrum will drift off of the plumb line, toward the stronger limb. The key with this method is to adjust relative limb strength so the hook follows the plumb line.

So long as this is understood, either method will work to dynamically balance a bow, assuming all else is properly set up... i.e. you are in fact holding and pulling from the proper places... as the archer will.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: hightop_hunter on August 05, 2018, 12:05:19 AM
I was just getting on here to Add a question about moving the shelf/center of the bow up or down, and why it matters but its like the forum read my mind. thanks for all the useful information. I'm sure I will have to reread this post a few times but im still not sure I understand why you move the shelf up 1"  if the limbs are timed properly  wouldn't that change the timing of the limbs if you are no longer anchoring in the dead centre of the bow?
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Roy from Pa on August 06, 2018, 01:40:18 PM
No, you define the arrow shelf and grip first, then place the trees pull rope where the middle finger of your drawing hand will be when shooting the bow and time the limbs to that..
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: styksnstryngs on August 06, 2018, 08:04:25 PM
I don't know how you grip your bow, but for me, the throat of the grip is where the majority of the pressure is. And in regards to Olympic bows, the top and bottom limbs are the same length.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Roy from Pa on August 06, 2018, 09:35:33 PM
Yup, it depends on the hand grip also.

Low, medium, or a high grip and grip shape determines how your trees cradle is setup.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: hightop_hunter on August 06, 2018, 09:38:41 PM
Hmm iv always done the tiller then did the grip. But i like this I think ill give it a try on the bow I'm currently working on. are there any books or literature you can suggest for tillering a glass bow. ?

Thanks Roy  for the tips
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 07, 2018, 09:24:33 AM
In Jim Thorne article on his web page. He achieved even tiller out to 20" with tiller board grip dead center and rope dead center regardless of what ever style of shooting..............Then final tillering, he adjusted tiller board grip to center of grip pressure to however the archer holds the bow,(low, med, high) and rope pull on string  to center of archer finger pull ( depends on style he used, three finger or split) and tiller the bow out to his draw length. He stated at his draw length he like limbs even tiller for three under and split was a 1/8 to 1/4
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 08, 2018, 10:26:19 AM
My original question was how to build a bow favorable for this "crawl" epidemic i pick up!!!  We have bounced around ideas and suggestions on bow design.... thanks for the input and i have learned a couple things.......................so................my new bow project is getting close to rubber meeting the road ( riser glued up, lams are ground, etc.) ..............
As of last night of shooting my current bow i have set up....with a light smell of Silver patron present....here are my dedutions

1. My current 58" curve.....just doesnt like a "crawl" set up...Arrows fly erractic.
2. The high string angle on the nock really pushes down on back of  arrow at release to cause a low nock at impact.
3. Crawl it seems is for longer bows 64" 68" ( less string angle)
4. All my deciphering on where the balance center vs true center of the riser vs low grip..yada yada....doesnt matter  my bow is too short. No tiller adjustment will lesson the string angle of a 52" string braced to 29.5"
5. Split finger still casts the prettiest arrow i can throw out of any bow... But Been too long on the dark side to go back. Three under it is
6. my future/  make this current project as usual design as my 58" but 2" longer on limbs
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 08, 2018, 10:50:33 AM
2 “ longer limbs will only  change a few degrees of string angle however if you designing a recurve or a static tip then you can time the tips to remain at 88-90 degrees for the best string angles possible for a particular bow. You will do that by tillering/timming the limbs to do so at draw.

Recurves are not as stable as deep core hybrid or longbows so using an existing bow that was not tillered/timed for how your shooting it adds to the instability of the limb causing erratic flight and oscillation. I have a 56” extreme hybrid that has a higher shelf , 2.5”, than my normal 1”. I simply tillered the limbs to where I am drawing from and it shoots just like the others set at neutral.

If you want a recurve you may consider a deep core recurve limb or an extreme hybrid but I think as long as you time the limbs from where your drawing it on the string you will be fine.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 08, 2018, 11:36:17 AM
Stick ...on your hybrid.......what is your shooting style?  Raising the shelf ,only increases my string angle. I shoot a 1/2" shelf now built up with JB Weld under leather

Nuts and bolts of my deductions...the Crawl is for longer bows, period..

I only went to the crawl because i love the solid anchor in corner of my mouth yet my arrow is right under my eye like a shotgun...so deadly a system at 20 and in.. it's like pointing a shotgun at deer at 18 yards..

i have an unlimited supply of grizzly sticks :bigsmyl:   well almost......going to try different spines
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: stickmonkey on August 08, 2018, 12:08:56 PM
The customer wanted 3 under for that hybrid.

The shape of the shooter face plays an important role in choosing a style and anchor that’s often overlooked. Three under puts the nock under my dominat eye but I have to push hard and deeply into the corner of my mouth to get the same with split finger. When I started 30 years ago I shot split finger as it kept the arrow inline under my dominant eye but as I matured and gained weight in my face my anchor had to change to keep the same alignment.

The crawl is nothing new and the bows length doesn’t matter if it’s tillered to where your drawing on the string. Yes The higher you go on the string the steeper the angle but that angle doesn’t cause an torsional instability to be induced reguardless of the bows length. The erratic light is a product of the limbs not being timed to the where your drawing on the string.

Time to build it and see.
Title: Re: Bow Physics revisited.....New Question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: joebuck on August 23, 2018, 09:58:42 AM
Well............bow is finished except for spraying and shot a hundred arrows out of it tunning to a bareshaft. Very very pleased with accuracy. It's Bareshaft grouping a golf ball size group at 18 yards 320 TDT  New Grizzly Sticks Victory with a 175pt.  ....Very pleased with my handle and torque is diminished. Fooled with side plate thickness by adding leather to get the shaft a slight fade at point with string lined up dead center. Bow tillered out to my sweet spot at 29" . Came out at 50# 29 which feels like a dream for a guy thats 56 and been shooting 68# for 25 plus years.  feel like i am cheating now. :goldtooth:
Tillering for the Fixed Crawl...to the nuts and bolts.......I tillered the bow by placing the fulgram of handle on pulley board wall exactly where pressure is for my heel/base thumb. Then i hooked up pull down hook on string exactly where my middle finger ( center) of my 3 under grip. I then tillered the limbs at 30" to Even tiller on the wall graph. Interesting point here is .........this bow upper limb is 1/8" negative tiller at brace.!   Since it is shooting like a lazer with bareshafts...........I am cool with a slightly stronger upper limb at brace.   not sure of the physics or what but second set of limbs will be in works soon to get more data.


Right Now for my Data and stats to build a bow for fixed crawl
60" T/D recurve ( 27 " limbs and 16" riser)
50# at 29"
1/8" negative tiller at brace upper
Even tiller at 30"
590 gr arrow 171fps at 29"at 50#
500 gr arrow at 50# at 29"  190fps at 10gr/per pound