Trad Gang
Main Boards => The Bowyer's Bench => Topic started by: mwosborn on July 20, 2017, 08:28:00 PM
-
Would there be much difference in performance using a single parallel lamination twice the thickness of 2 separate laminations?
For example in these two stacks.
2 - .04" glass
1 - .120" taper .003
2 - .06" parallel
2 - .04" glass
1 - .120" taper .003
1 = .120" parallel
-
I've never tested this theory but I think more lams will be stronger just like hi grade plywood. So maybe a couple lbs extra with same stack.
-
Thanks Kenny.
-
2x Kenny... I don't have personal experience with that but what Kenny says makes sense and an old experienced bowyer told me the more lams the better...
-
If the 2 lams were from the same piece of wood cut one right after the other vs one lam from same piece of wood I doubt there wood be any difference. There is basically no way to prove a or b since the wood is gone. There are several bowyers that use the 2 lam style. Bama bows for one.
-
Al... Here is something for you to ponder... Get a 2x4 and rip 4- 1/4" thick pieces and 8- 1/8" pieces... Take the 1/4" pieces and glue them up in a 24" dia. half circle... Do the same with the 1/8" pieces... Now see which one has less spring-back...
In a bow it may or may not make that much a difference... It depends on the bow, the radius of the limbs, length of the limbs, thickness of the limbs and how thick the lams will have to be... On a lightweight bow you could get by with 2 core lams... With a thicker limb bow more lams would be a wiser choice... However on a straight limbed 70# Hill style bow you could get by with one core lam... But its be proven that a laminated wood with the grains somewhat crossing will be consistently stronger than a solid piece of wood...
-
On a one piece bow with typical riser design... you will have to use the two 060 laminations because it would be very hard to get a .120 lamination to run up the typical riser fade without a gap between the riser fade and lamination.. even with 60 psi in the air hose. I prefer those lams to be 070 or less.
-
I don't disagree with more lams, but are we saying a self bow, basically one lam, is junk?
-
More lams less spring back = stiffer and a bit more power stroke. Enuff to worry about ? every little bit helps. :D
-
Originally posted by Al Dean:
I don't disagree with more lams, but are we saying a self bow, basically one lam, is junk?
I don't think anyone is saying they are junk. Merely that a single piece is going to be weaker and more prone to failure.
-
2x Crooked...
-
Originally posted by Robertfishes:
On a one piece bow with typical riser design... you will have to use the two 060 laminations because it would be very hard to get a .120 lamination to run up the typical riser fade without a gap between the riser fade and lamination.. even with 60 psi in the air hose. I prefer those lams to be 070 or less.
That is a very good point Robert... But there is a trick to that... Unless your ramp design absolutely aesthetically calls for that curve, if you flatten out the last 3/4" of the ramp I'll bet you those thicker lams will lay down nicely... Provided you do not have an extreme curve , of course...
-
Originally posted by Al Dean:
I don't disagree with more lams, but are we saying a self bow, basically one lam, is junk?
This is just a curiosity question for selfbow guys: more growth rings or bigger ones for better performance ?
I don't know much about them, maybe someday when things slow down a bit.....
-
Reply With Quote
I don't disagree with more lams, but are we saying a self bow, basically one lam, is junk?
I dont even think you are comparing apples to apples
. They are both bows. One with modern composites one with natural wood crafted to bend with good tiller.
Not junk if done right.
-
My thought question was if a selfie has tighter rings, is it a better performer(usually)?
Wouldn't this be like more laminations except no glass?
-
Good point on the rings Kenny. In essence a self bow properly made is some what similar to a lam bow.
-
Without experience I would think tighter rings would be stronger, therefore stiffer with less thickness? Just thinkin out loud....
-
Or does the ratio of light to dark wood (early/late rings)have an effect on performance? :confused:
-
I was just trying to research that with Douglas fir... Do any of you guys have experience with DF?? Would you want smaller tighter rings or have them spread out..??