Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: JC on December 22, 2007, 12:07:00 PM

Title: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 22, 2007, 12:07:00 PM
I can't count the # of emails and pm's that I've gotten asking, "Now that you have both, which one is better?, What do they look like? How do they shoot? Which is faster? etc.etc."

Those are all difficult questions to answer...and you may be surprised by the final conclusion...or conclusions   ;)   I have come to. The testing sure has been an eye opener and more than a lot of fun.   :readit:  

The specs:

A&H ACS/CX , 62", Zebrawood/phenolic riser, 57#@27"
Morrison Shawnee/foam core/carbon back Dakota longbow limbs, 56", Zebrawood/midnight dymondwood riser, 59#@27"

Intro pics:

A&H
   (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture071.jpg)

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture068.jpg)

Morrison
  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/Morrison/Picture062.jpg)

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/Morrison/Picture063.jpg)

Fit and finish on both bows was pretty much perfect. The A&H uses a finish reminescent of the blackwidow I once owned: very hard with a slight texture, a very slight but pleasing sheen. The Morrison has a flat clear finish, seemingly not as hard as the A&H. I could find no visible flaws in either bow.

Over the next few days, I'll post some updates, more pics, some subjective and objective data...sorry, not trying to stall, just a busy time of the year.   :campfire:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: vermonster13 on December 22, 2007, 12:18:00 PM
That is one sweet set of risers JC.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: sticshooter on December 22, 2007, 12:23:00 PM
:eek:      :eek:      :eek:      :eek:   WOWZERS! BOTH OF THEM ARE SWEET.<><
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Looper on December 22, 2007, 12:30:00 PM
Is the Morrison 56" or 66"?  You typed 56, but I'm guessing you meant 66.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 22, 2007, 12:30:00 PM
Ok, now what was your findings beyond the finish??? They are both very beautiful. I am curious about what arrows you are shooting out of both, fps, etc.  Come on "show and tell" time.  lol
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Gene Roberts on December 22, 2007, 01:18:00 PM
Both beautiful,and Both probably shoot just as good.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: vermonster13 on December 22, 2007, 01:26:00 PM
With JC I'd say 56" is right.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Aggie1993 on December 22, 2007, 01:31:00 PM
Title of the thread sounds like a Heavy Weight Title Boxing Match!  Sweeeeeeet looking bows!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: sswv on December 22, 2007, 01:35:00 PM
sweet bows...looks like they came off the same mold.   :archer:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: deertraks on December 22, 2007, 01:52:00 PM
Very nice! This one thread I'm going to watch.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: ronda on December 22, 2007, 09:15:00 PM
fantastic looking bows. I'm on the list for a acs cx and very interested in hearing more about them. Todd
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 23, 2007, 09:48:00 AM
Looper, nope, 56" is correct for the Morrison. I only draw 27" so don't need anything longer.

I hope to have the chrono #'s as soon as the weather clears...we've had rain (THANK GOD!) for the last 3 days off and on and not enough good sunshine for accurate readings.

More visual aspects:

I really like the trim A&H riser; it's width is as minimal as I think it can be made, gives the 62" bow a very "svelte" sexy profile from any angle. The riser has an unusual curve at the window, very unique look for a wood riser.

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture073.jpg)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture077.jpg)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture074.jpg)

The grip is very good. Although it's a bit higher than I normally like on longbows, it is very easy to get consistent hand placement. My only complaint is a very slight ridge at the web area. Now, if you shoot high wrist, for some reason you don't feel it, but I like my whole hand pressure on a longbow and I'll take some sandpaper to it if it stays. Just a preference, not a design flaw or issue at all.

The tips of the A&H are a bit beefier than the previous Adcock built bows I've seen. One issue I personally have had with other ACS bows was the stability of the limb tips, I have a few friends on this board who own or have owned ACS bows that unstrung themselves if bumped hard on the limb tip, and some even if not layed down flat carefully. This is not the case with this A&H model I have. I don't think the bow would unstring unless you puprosefully meant to. I was really glad to see this change.

I wish my camera could capture the subtleties of the the Adcock Cross Section....again, very unique. Obviously an ingenious, effective design.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 23, 2007, 10:54:00 AM
Waiting for the rain to clear...............................Both have their plusses without minuses. I don't have any foam cores so this will be enlightening. But wait! Are foam cores trad? Has anybody checked to see if the mods may pull this thread? Oh no!!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 23, 2007, 11:07:00 AM
Bjorn, I'm not sure what boards you typically frequent, but you will get very little arguement on what material makes a trad bow on this one...and certainly not from this moderator.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: robtattoo on December 23, 2007, 12:33:00 PM
Waiting with baited breath Joe.....I'm gonna be ordering either a Morrison or an ACS next year. I'm leaning toward the Morrison at the moment, but I'm still on the fence.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 23, 2007, 12:53:00 PM
Why I normally hang out here JC, Thanks, LOL!
Rob, I have both-no foam-of course;  you have to spend some time with each. In my mind at this level it is purely subjective-a few fps aside-some prefer blondes and others redheads but then again it is still 'Raining in Georgia'.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 23, 2007, 06:28:00 PM
Rob, I agree with Bjorn; no matter what, I'd shoot both before I plunked down my hard earned cash. But, that said, you won't be sorry with either one.

It cleared, but not before wrestling practice was over tonight, maybe tomorrow. And yes, I think most of the preferences folks have between these two bows, are just that....preferences.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: rastaman on December 24, 2007, 10:49:00 AM
JC,
you are killing me...please,please, quit teasing us.
Randy
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 24, 2007, 12:28:00 PM
Well according to NOAA the weather in most of Georgia is pretty good right about now!
JC come out and play!! LOL!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: foudarme on December 24, 2007, 01:58:00 PM
hurry up...we are all waiting for the tests !!!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 03:32:00 PM
Yer right, it's a beautiful day today! Whole family is here so we had to play a marathon monopoly game this morning....but just got back in from shooting    :readit:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 24, 2007, 03:47:00 PM
Wow! Those speeds are so close looking at the the gr/# results. Were you 10' away from the front of the chrono?-Or is that a typo?
Very good test Joe, your detail is really well covered.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 03:49:00 PM
After shooting for chrono #'s, I spent a little time shooting for fun, from 10yards to....way back there.

A&H ACS really liked the 542gr arrow: Beman ICS Hunter 340's, 28 3/4" BOP, 50gr brass insert, 200gr head, 4x4" low profile nanners, no dip/crown. I need to do a bit more tuning to get this one perfect but it's real close. I still have difficulty with the bow shooting too the right, even with arrows that are slightly stiff. I'm sure I could cure that with a bit of grip sanding or simply shooting this bow exclusively for a while:

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/AH%20ACS-CX/Picture053.jpg)

Shawnee/Dakota liked the 575gr arrow best: Carbon Express Terminator Hunter 60/75, 29 1/8 BOP, standard aluminum insert, 200gr head, 4x4" low profile nanners with small dip/crown. This one bareshafted perfectly out to....well...I'm not gonna tell you...but this one was a "fer poke" as my granpap would say:

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/Morrison/Picture059.jpg)
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 03:53:00 PM
Bjorn, we just went and remeasured...from my feet to the start window was 10'....looks about roughly 8' from front of riser. Edited above.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: robtattoo on December 24, 2007, 03:57:00 PM
That Morrison is getting prettier by the post!

Great speeds from both bows, you ain't making this any easier, are ya?!  :D  :D
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 04:02:00 PM
I told ya Rob, these are the two best longbows I've ever had in my hands. I might even stretch and say, they are the two best bows period, I've ever had in my hands. Those who know me, may be asking if I fell and hit my head    :eek:  

Oh yeah, and here's the special Eagle's Flight quiver Don & Karen Ward built for me just a few days ago; black leather, black stitching and black SHARKSKIN....ooooooh sooo coool lookin!

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/recurvhuntr/Morrison/Picture067.jpg)

Anyone notice anything unusual from this and the other pics about the mounting of this quiver?   :saywhat:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 24, 2007, 05:03:00 PM
That quiver is definitely Luciferous-made by Mr. and Mrs. Bowdoc?
How is that held on anyway? The riser is still completely flush to the limb, and I don't imagine you drilled the side of that gorgeous riser.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Shaun on December 24, 2007, 05:05:00 PM
JC good stuff and well documented. Looks like that Eagles Flight is mounted to bushings in the riser, good plan. Bob should be proud of any longbow that can get you to say such sweet things about it.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 05:17:00 PM
Bjorn, sorry for the confusion, Don Ward of Eagle's flight archery in NC....not "The Real Bowdoc" Don Ward....though I'm sure if he decided to make a quiver it would be one finely crafted one.

Shaun, the bow is deserving of every word. And thank you for your insinuation, it means a lot coming from someone who is as seasoned as you.

I'm using limb bolts that are drilled and tapped internally, a-la habu for those of you who have owned one. The limb bolt screws in, then the bolt on quiver screws down into the recess of limb bolt. My only, and I do emphasize only, complaint about the shawnee is the limbs that screw in from the rear...not as easy to mount a quiver as the standard front riser mount bolts.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Tique on December 24, 2007, 06:40:00 PM
JC, was wondering if you used special limb bolts to mount that quiver; now I know. Nice shooting BTW; realy enjoying this thread!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 24, 2007, 07:04:00 PM
Glad to see the Cheyenne held up pretty well against those speed demons.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 24, 2007, 07:49:00 PM
Snag, prior to these two bows, this particular Cheyenne was the fastest bow I've shot. Bob says the new foam core/fiberglass Cheyenne limbs will match these new longbow limbs. I'll hopefully be able to see that for myself in a few more months.

I prefer to think of these two as "speed angels" cause nothing this sweet and fine could be called a "demon"   ;)
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Guru on December 24, 2007, 08:35:00 PM
good stuff there bud...good luck with them both.

Merry Christmas!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Hooked on December 24, 2007, 09:45:00 PM
Thanks, for sharing all that!  Now if I can ever afford one of the two, I will have a tough choice to make!!!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: ronda on December 24, 2007, 10:10:00 PM
I've got a acs cx on the way, the wife is going to kill me when I tell her I need a Morrison also.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Seeking Trad Deer on December 24, 2007, 10:13:00 PM
JC...
Any idea how many fps you would pick up with the foam core limbs over the regular actionboo Cheyenne limbs?  Any noise difference in the regular cheyenne limbs verses a foam coare limb?
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: mooseman76 on December 24, 2007, 10:36:00 PM
JC...Those bows are sweet.  Is the morrison carbon on the belly and back?  Do you have any pics from the front and back of the Morrison.  Not trying to make the ACS jealous by only asking about the Morrison, but I already owned an ACS...Mike
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: buckster on December 24, 2007, 10:40:00 PM
Will anxiously await your results JC.  Man them are some sweeties.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Crooked Stic on December 24, 2007, 11:02:00 PM
A body cant complain about those numbers.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Alex.B on December 24, 2007, 11:05:00 PM
Joe
Thanks, I love that chrono analysis stuff!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Rod Jenkins on December 24, 2007, 11:21:00 PM
JC...try building the sideplate out to .200 or so on the CX, I bet you will see the left arrows go away...dont double the velcro to get the thickness...it will only compress during paradox, and leave you with less than you need.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 25, 2007, 12:31:00 AM
JC, I like that..."speed angels"! Much better description. Once I got the ACS-CX figured out it chrono'd to about 185-187fps. In my book that is fast!  It took awhile to figure out the grip and arrow combo. It loved the 80-84# POC tapered arrows I made today!    I am really looking forward to seeing how the Cheyenne shoots. Should have the limbs late this week.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: smiley on December 25, 2007, 07:27:00 AM
thanks for the test now I have to same money again
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Jeremy on December 25, 2007, 07:27:00 AM
Dang.  Nice looking and FAST bows!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Tater on December 25, 2007, 08:35:00 AM
JC,
  Thank's for the info, tic...tock...tic...tock now I just have to wait till my new Shawnee gets here.

                Tater
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 25, 2007, 02:14:00 PM
Mike, Bob says the new foam core Cheyenne limbs will equal the performance of the foam/carbon longbow limbs...so that should be about 3-5fps conservatively over the boo cores. But check with Bob, I could be incorrect on that.

Mike, I'll post some more pics of the Morrison for you. The carbon is on the back, foam core, black fiberglass belly.

Thanks Rod, yep, already started fiddlin with the strike plate and a piece of leather lacing behind the velcro...but the rain has set in again so I can't tell if it was enough/too much.

Thanks for the compliments fellers...now I just gotta figure out how I'm gonna keep both of em!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Arrowslinger on December 25, 2007, 02:38:00 PM
JC, I love both of those bows.  Maybe I will get a look at them at some of the shoots.    :thumbsup:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: beachbowhunter on December 25, 2007, 04:01:00 PM
JC, I'll be your Wing Man. You just let me know which one is second fiddle and send her over  :biglaugh:  

Merry Christmas to you and yours. Please do me a favor and give old Cosmic Ray a hug. I think he could use one right now..
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: kawika b on December 25, 2007, 05:48:00 PM
CX has the edge in speed,,,Morrison walks away in the looks department,,, and JC is getting the envy from everyone! Sweet stick ya got there JC,,, could never go wrong with either one of em.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 25, 2007, 06:15:00 PM
I got my new Cheyenne yesterday, with the foam core limbs. It is 46#@26.5". I snuck it out today to the dog park, and shot a few arras. The first thing I put over the shelf was a bareshaft 2016, which plunked in straight and center-punched the target at 13 or so yards.

Will I chrono it? Someday, maybe. I don't worry about 5 fps here or there. I can only say right now that the bow pulls smoothly, and packs a wallop for its weight. Hmm. I haven't put it on a scale to see if it pulls the same weight that is on the limbs. Aw, Bob wouldn't put an untruth on there, so I won't bother checking.

I am still wondering when/if I should tell Mockingbird about my new bow..  :rolleyes:  
Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: vermonster13 on December 25, 2007, 06:31:00 PM
We need pictures Killie
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 25, 2007, 06:42:00 PM
I was halfway down the steps when I remembered I forgot my camera. This pic is the one that Bob had on his website, before the half pinecone got put on.

  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/7218Cheyenne.jpg)

Or, do you mean you need a pic of the bareshaft in the target? I coulda faked that though.

Killdeer   :bigsmyl:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Bjorn on December 25, 2007, 06:46:00 PM
Well, that certainly is a beauty of a riser-didja' get limbs too?
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: The Whittler on December 25, 2007, 06:50:00 PM
Oh Kill D. that is one very fine looking riser, love the wood combo.

Congrats on everyones new bow they got for Christmas.

Alan
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: DesertDude on December 25, 2007, 06:52:00 PM
The wood combo on that riser is Stunning. The grain by the grip area is hard to put in words. Enjoy and thank you for sharing.

Mark
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 25, 2007, 07:05:00 PM
Bjorn, scroll up and read my previous post.  :archer:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: mooseman76 on December 25, 2007, 10:31:00 PM
Sweet looking riser Killdeer.  Macassar ebony and bocote?  I'd like a look at your bow with the limbs as well.  Are these recurve limbs with foam cores?  Same setup as JC carbon on the back/foam core/black glass belly?  Man, you all are gonna get me shot when I tell the wife I NEED one of these as well...Mike
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 25, 2007, 10:47:00 PM
You're killing me Killdeer! That's a real beauty. Glad to hear it shoots as good as it looks. When did you order it? I am still waiting, with the holiday shipping, for my limbs. That Macassar, IMHO, is the prettiest wood out there.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 25, 2007, 10:48:00 PM
No carbon, there wasn't enough gain to make it worthwhile on the recurves. Seems to be the ticket for a longbow, though.

Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: vermonster13 on December 25, 2007, 10:48:00 PM
Nice bow Killie!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 25, 2007, 10:50:00 PM
Snag, when I saw your riser, I had second thoughts. That has a quiet, reserved beauty that hits me dead center!

Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Seeking Trad Deer on December 26, 2007, 09:20:00 PM
If I could afford to I would decorate my house with Morrison Risers...they are artwork   :thumbsup:    :)
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 26, 2007, 10:30:00 PM
I can see it now...Panelling by Morrison. Bob waltzing out in a white coat and Panama hat, or a beret, with a sidekick carrying his portfolio. Pao ferro feng shui, Tex-Tite lava lamps...

I am going to have nightmares, I just know it.
Killdeer   :help:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 27, 2007, 07:30:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Killdeer:
I can see it now...Panelling by Morrison. Bob waltzing out in a white coat and Panama hat, or a beret, with a sidekick carrying his portfolio. Pao ferro feng shui, Tex-Tite lava lamps...

I am going to have nightmares, I just know it.
Killdeer    :help:  
Now that's funny right there...  :biglaugh:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: DEAN on December 27, 2007, 07:56:00 AM
That riser is beautiful!!!Now how about some differant angles with the limbs?????
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Doc Nock on December 27, 2007, 08:51:00 AM
See what you started, JC!   "[dntthnk]"    :rolleyes:  

Now it will be a show'n tell to make the rest of us turn a bilious shade of green!   :D
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Rick James on December 27, 2007, 09:46:00 AM
Ya'll help a slightly ignorant Central Georgia redneck out--What exactly is a "Foam Core"??thanks, Rick
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: JC on December 27, 2007, 09:55:00 AM
Rick, it's literally a piece of foam instead of bamboo that goes in the core of the limb. Not sure how he does it, but Bob turns it into a heck of a longbow limb!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Rod Jenkins on December 27, 2007, 10:30:00 AM
Syntactic foam is simply glass microballoons in an epoxy matrix. Earl Hoyt Jr first used Syntactic Foam cores in his target recurve limbs back in the late 70's...good stuff, very consistant !
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 27, 2007, 12:59:00 PM
Sounds like something old made new again...kind of a resurrected idea.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Tater 2 on December 27, 2007, 01:40:00 PM
Syntactic foam is simply glass microballoons in an epoxy matrix.

    Yea that's what it is! Looks like it works whatever it is.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: MountainTool21 on December 27, 2007, 07:30:00 PM
JC
That morrison has to be THE cleanest looking bow I have seen yet from Bob.  I just got my ACS CX last week 66" 57# @28" alum riser. It's a damn rocket, dead in the hand, and wisper quite too. My neighbors complimented me on it then asked what the hell it was! Happy New Year    Andrew
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 27, 2007, 10:35:00 PM
Syntactic?
Is that the MO used when doing something you shouldn't?

Here are today's pics;

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/Img_5144_Edit.jpg)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/Img_5149.jpg)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/Img_5148.jpg)

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/Img_5141.jpg)

I really like this bow.   :bigsmyl:  
Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Rod Jenkins on December 27, 2007, 11:09:00 PM
naw...I think thats something else that ends in TIC  :D  

Sweet looking bow, you have there Killy !
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: mooseman76 on December 28, 2007, 12:21:00 AM
Very nice Killdeer.  1 more question I hear about half pinecones and full pinecones on Morrisons.  Anyone care to explain what the difference is?  Thanks...Mike
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 28, 2007, 05:04:00 AM
He puts another pine cone on. Poor sap, ya really gotta needle him to do it.

Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 28, 2007, 09:48:00 AM
That quiver matches up nicely with the bow! You know you are killing me! Still waiting on limbs. Can you post a picture of the limb fronts? Kind of a quarter to the bow shot. Where did you get that tab? I don't think I have seen one like that. Beautiful setup Killdeer!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 28, 2007, 02:15:00 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/Killdeer/TG%20Uploads/Archery%20Equipment/Img_5146.jpg)

The limbs are just a plain satin black. The tab is an old one, I picked ip up from a vendor at Baltimore my first year out there. It is stretched-out and the sealskin has lost its hair in the critical parts, but it shoots like my bare fingers. I will replace the bit of sealskin shortly. It is built the same as a cheap calfskin tab with no spacer.

The quiver was made by our friend in archery, Mike G., of Mike's Archery Leather. I don't like back quivers...but I like this one.
   :bigsmyl:  

Killdeer
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: k. sisco on December 28, 2007, 08:02:00 PM
JC,
I also have the foam core limbs.
Mine are:53#@26"
My arrows were 528gr- 191fps.
I really like these limbs.
I will post pics.of this bow tommorrow.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: tukudu on December 28, 2007, 08:20:00 PM
Killdeer,
   I don't know how you put all that information together from the last request but you hit the nail right on the head. tom
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: highcountry on December 28, 2007, 10:46:00 PM
Wow! that is beautiful.  I mean the green grass.  Forgot what green grass looked like. Just been freezing my ^%#* off lately.  I would like some of those bows to decorate this cabin. I have one of the newer A&H Kingwood, really a sweet shooter.  But I just got lucky and bought my old Adcock back.  That old bow is something else.  Maybe it is just Rod's string doing the magic. The riser is a little larger which I like better.  We are so lucky to have so many great artist making bows now.
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Killdeer on December 29, 2007, 05:50:00 AM
Highcountry, these ARE the good old days!

Killdeer  :bigsmyl:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: snag on December 29, 2007, 09:08:00 AM
Amen, to that sister!
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Randy Morin on December 29, 2007, 09:29:00 AM
Thanks JC, I was really lookin forward to the results.  Your Bows and Killies are just beautiful...dang Morrisons are somethin-else.  I've been buiding some 3-piece Hybrids and from the get-go Bob's bows have always been a huge source of design inspiration and motivation ta-boot.  

Thanks Again...now if I could just shoot-em myself.    :pray:
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: RRock on December 29, 2007, 11:20:00 AM
does anyone know a source for this syntactic foam?
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: slayer1 on January 11, 2008, 10:01:00 AM
TTT
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: jerome ciclet on May 22, 2008, 09:53:00 AM
Thanks for the test
Title: Re: A&H ACS/CX vs. Morrison Shawnee/Dakota Foam/Carbon...chrono #'s added pg2
Post by: Orion on May 22, 2008, 11:33:00 AM
Goinig back to your original numbers, J.C., looks like the A&H does a little better with heavier arrows, the Morrison with lighter arrows.  Differences aren't great though.  Both are quite impressive.