Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Yolla Bolly on December 08, 2007, 07:44:00 AM

Title: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Yolla Bolly on December 08, 2007, 07:44:00 AM
I need to make a decision regarding arrow shafts.
I shoot a longbow---56 # draw @ 27 in.
My present arrow are CE 100's---cut to 27 7/8 inch  with 3 grain/inch weight tubes.  The charts say they are underspined, but a trial of stiffer shaft was unsuccessful.  These bareshaft well with 200 grains heads, and broadheads of the same weight fly well and hit to same point of impact.  The complete arrow weighs 498 gr: that works out to 8.9 gr per # draw.
The balance point is 8 3/8 in. behind the point and 19 1/2 in front of the nock throat.
Wanting a heavier arrow, I bought some 8 gr. /in. weight tubes to try, and they increased the weight of the bare shafts by 130 gr.  I thought they were stiffer than the 3 gr tubes,  and rigged a field expedient spine tester to prove they were, so I figured I would need to increase the head weight.  Instead I found that I had to drop to 150 gr to get good bareshaft flight. ( I can only hypothesize that the additional mass in the front of the shaft overshadows any effect on spine by the stiffer weight tube).
So the net effect is a total arrow weight 583 gr = 10.4 gr/#draw.
I think I can work with that, but the balance point is moved exactly 2 inches aft:  now 10 3/8 in is in front--17 1/2 is in back.

Sooo--- will the loss of FOC negate any penetration gain from such a minimal increase (17 %) in total weight?

Or do I give up and spring for Grizzly Sticks and see if I can load up enough mass in the front to get them fly?
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Killdeer on December 08, 2007, 07:53:00 AM
Too complicated for me...  :confused:  
Try some ash shafts.  :)  

Killdeer  :biglaugh:
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Yolla Bolly on December 08, 2007, 08:03:00 AM
Thanks Killdeer---I tried that long time ago---made a lot of kindling---I live on volcano
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Pete W on December 08, 2007, 08:06:00 AM
If they shoot good, Put away the calculator.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Yolla Bolly on December 08, 2007, 08:39:00 AM
I hear ya Pete---I haven't stopped shooting----just don't want to mess up on an elk, if given an opportunity.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: fxe on December 08, 2007, 08:44:00 AM
At 56# draw with a sharpe broadhead in the right spot an elk will be in trouble!At almost 9gr. an in. I would go with what was flyin right and not worry.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: flatlander37 on December 08, 2007, 12:33:00 PM
There are alot of guys on here that shoot 8-9 gpp with no adverse affect.  I also trust what Pete says.  As long as you have good flight don't worry.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: bearhair on December 08, 2007, 04:37:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Yolla Bolly:
 from such a minimal increase (17 %) in total weight?
I wish I could convince my boss that a 17% increase in my pay was minimal  :p    :D    :p
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: killinstuff on December 08, 2007, 04:48:00 PM
Dude, you read to much. Remember, it's called traditional archery, a stick and a string. Try to keep it simple, you'll enjoy it more.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Yolla Bolly on December 08, 2007, 11:08:00 PM
Thanks folks---obsessive thought patterns are commom in my profession----just needed to know I am doing right by the game I hunt.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Shawn Leonard on December 08, 2007, 11:24:00 PM
I shot through 4 deer this yaer with about 8.7 gpp. so do not think too much, jus go kill sumthin'! Shawn
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Otto on December 08, 2007, 11:42:00 PM
Yolla

I don't think you've hurt a thing.  Your FOC is still around 12% so I don't see any issue with your set up.
Title: Re: An arrow quandry---Help please
Post by: Yolla Bolly on December 10, 2007, 01:29:00 AM
Thank you, Otto.  Sure glad I can calculate drug doses better than FOC's!!