Trad Gang

Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: Tom I. on May 12, 2009, 05:49:00 PM

Title: I thought Polar's were supposed to be economical
Post by: Tom I. on May 12, 2009, 05:49:00 PM

290314479704

Anyone here get this one?  Pretty bow that I thought would good for about $150-$175.....
Tom I.

Title: Re: I thought Polar's were supposed to be economical
Post by: ckruse on May 12, 2009, 05:52:00 PM

That's a 62 in the less common ladies version (63" length, weighed at 24"). I sold a set right handed for a good chunk of change a couple of years ago. It all depends on who wants it! CKruse

Title: Re: I thought Polar's were supposed to be economical
Post by: jcar315 on May 12, 2009, 07:17:00 PM

Tom, There are times when bows on **** just go for WAY more than I think they will. In my case I chalk it up to my lack of knowledge. I watch alot of bows and I too am drawn to the LH ones. You just never know what someone else is thinking.

Title: Re: I thought Polar's were supposed to be economical
Post by: richbat on May 13, 2009, 07:16:00 AM

heck,i just traded a real nice 1955 polar to bwhntr11 over on archerytalk,for some leather goods.it was 62'' or 64'' at 48# the bow was bought off mike shaw on here.probably would have got a nice price for it on that other site,but try and steer clear of it.rich in pa.