Trad Gang

Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: Mobear on April 02, 2009, 07:30:00 PM

Title: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 02, 2009, 07:30:00 PM: I have a few questions. Pulled my fatheres old recurve out last month and started shooting it. Everything was fine till last week when I heard cracking on drawing the bow. Laminations seperated. I was bummed to say the least.
It was a 56# 60" ad my draw length is about 30". I was wondering if I could attribute it breaking because of a 30" draw length? In any case, I was set on getting a new bow not to have to worry about it breaking and was looking at the Martin Hunter (62"). I like a one piece also. Anyway I saw a '55 Kodiak on **** that was 64" and 55#'s . I should be getting it on Monday. I'm assuming that I would need a 60" Dacron string? Also I was wondering what the reccomended brace height was for this bow? My last question is - Am I chasing a dream thinking that I can get by frequently shooting this old bow, or should I just go and get a modern recurve for shooting? I know that's a lot, but I'm re-addicted after a long traditional bow layoff. THANKS
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: TRAP on April 02, 2009, 07:53:00 PM: I shoot my 55 Kodiak quite often. If it's sound, shoot it.

Trap
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 02, 2009, 08:28:00 PM: Hopefully, that's the plan!
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 06, 2009, 09:39:00 PM: Here are a few (not too good) pictures of the dammage....
(http:// [IMG]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04021.jpg )[/IMG]

(http:// [IMG]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04032.jpg )[/IMG]

The bow on top is the bow that I thought was going to be a Kodiak. I'll have tho get some pictures of it. It has a serial Number of ME67 and is 64" and 55#. More redish color glass than my kobiak and the limbs are a "semi recurve?". No string grooves. Polar or Cub, I'm not sure. I would like to sell it.
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 06, 2009, 09:43:00 PM: Oops

(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04032.jpg)

(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04021.jpg)

(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04033.jpg)
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Wade Phillips on April 06, 2009, 09:47:00 PM: Mobear - Glad you see you got the images posted...

You actually could have just edited the previous post by clicking on the pencil with the pad icon.
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: d. ward on April 06, 2009, 09:55:00 PM: wow MB looks like she danced her last dance.Thats a bad one there.bowdoc
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 06, 2009, 09:59:00 PM: I'm learning
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 06, 2009, 10:04:00 PM: Kinda thought it was bad...but ya never know. My wife is thinking I'm realy crazy, I going through withdrawals without a bow.
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Jeremy on April 07, 2009, 08:08:00 AM: The top bow is a '55 Polar. Nice bows and that's a good weight. Trade ya a '56 Kodiak (64" 50#)for it (Kodiak needs a little TLC) ;)

The problem with going by the marked length on the old 50's Bears is that they aren't necessarily correct or consistent. The bow length can vary by almost an inch (same model, same year, same marked length). At least the ones I've had.
Title: Re: 1955 Kodiak
Post by: Mobear on April 10, 2009, 01:38:00 PM: Here are sone photos of the Polar. Excuse the picture quality....
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04051.jpg)
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04048.jpg)
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04048.jpg)
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04046.jpg)
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04052.jpg)
(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww294/mobear_2009/DSC04053.jpg)
It looks like any marks on it could be cleaned off, I faven't touched it yet. The black manrks are from black tape that was wraped aroung it to hold a bow quiver