Trad Gang

Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: MJB on January 30, 2008, 09:29:00 AM

Title: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: MJB on January 30, 2008, 09:29:00 AM
Anyone know the year # 10CF22 . The second pic, are these stress cracks and can they be fixed. Wood type ? Brazilian Rosewood handle ?
Thanks
 (http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j297/treeyelpr/FSCN0325.jpg)
 (http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j297/treeyelpr/DSCN0332.jpg)
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on January 30, 2008, 09:41:00 AM
1964 Bear Kodiak mag,rosewood and bubinga.The stressers will really not hurt anything and will not affect the proformance of the bow.But yes they could be fixed with some super glue......bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: MJB on January 30, 2008, 09:44:00 AM
Doc,
Would they still be visible ? This could be a patient for you   :thumbsup:  

Thanks,
Mike
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on January 30, 2008, 09:52:00 AM
Hi Mike yes you may very well still see those cracks,but once glued they will not ever get any worse....I gotta tell ya too.I think thats one of the best looking bows Bear ever built.Never ever figured out why they never made a Kodiak that looked the same.If that were a 1965 it would be the same bow,but the serial number would have started with a 5....so there is no difference in the 64-65 mag...bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: bearmagtd on January 30, 2008, 10:57:00 AM
K mag in 64 catalog list it as Brazillian rosewood and bubinga , bow pictured in catalog is serial number 14bj434. The 70 K hunter is listed as Pau ferro and African bubinga for riser wood.
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: kurtbel5 on January 30, 2008, 01:31:00 PM
OK,OK, now I am truly confused (Again) I thought in the 60's it was safe to date 'em by the 1st # in the series.That would make that kmag a '61 (I am not questioning B.D.'s or anyone else's answer)reason I ask, I have one that must of come out of the form that same week, 4lbs lighter, last 2 digit different is all and I thought it was a '61 and does that mean my Polar is not a '63 it starts with a 3 but now I have no idea what year it is. dang it.
            Kurt
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on January 30, 2008, 03:04:00 PM
Hi Kurt not until 1965,then Bear used the last number of the year as the first number of the serial number.From 1965 until 1969 that dateing works.But that was the only time Bear Archery used the numbers that way.bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: Horney Toad on January 30, 2008, 08:31:00 PM
According to the bear catalogs, the 1970 mag uses pau ferro and bubinga, where the 1971 and 1972 use bubinga and shedua. The 1964 model with rosewood and bubinga and curved stripe is my favorite year, followed by the 1965 and 1966. Very nice looking bow.
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on January 31, 2008, 07:49:00 AM
Hi Bill your pics look like a 1970 Kodiak Hunter?Upper silk screen on the back of the bow? and no stabilizer bushing? Bear went with the straight stripe in the riser,rather then the curved.I was wondering if pau ferro? is like a fancy name for shedua?? Like African rosewood is bubinga? bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on February 01, 2008, 10:06:00 AM
Hey,I may make even you wait for the book.Actuly how many different 1961 Kodiaks were there???????? Ohh about 13 types.checks this out,bubinga 1 pc.bubinga 2 pc.bubinga 3 pc.bubinga wt purple heart.walnut 1 pc.walnut 2 pc.& 3 pc.butternut 1,2,3 pc.risers...walnut and butter nut...walnut and butter nut,wt purple heart ibeams.whoooooooo where are we so far.....bowdoc PS pack all this stuff about 10 good collecters knows into one book...
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: alaskabowhunter on February 01, 2008, 12:00:00 PM
Wade is working on a book "Fred Bear's Most Collectible Bows" , that is the only resource I know of at this time beside the knowledge you guys are sharing here,... my '61 Kodiak is walnut, butternut with a purple heart I beam... cool bow. It is the top bow on this rack.

 (http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d197/biggriz61/minnesota075.jpg)
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: MJB on February 01, 2008, 12:57:00 PM
Nice Collection   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on February 01, 2008, 09:23:00 PM
Tooooo many big heads in that group for the old bowdoc (low key baby).And besides without everyones notes what would the book read like ??? I think it would be best if it were something like Fred Bear's Favorite oddities...or Let's Keep those bows-a-rollen,Rawhide ........... bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: jim bowie on May 02, 2008, 02:15:00 AM
I have a 1969 KM looks just like the one your looking at except the rosewood is alot darker,
ser#9BM35 Flat gold coin. jim
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on May 02, 2008, 09:20:00 AM
Hey Jim can you load a pic...I actually think your bow is a 1964-1965 k mag rather then a 1969......bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: Horney Toad on May 04, 2008, 11:42:00 PM
I believe the 1964 and 1965 kodiak mags have different color glass right?
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: d. ward on May 05, 2008, 05:33:00 AM
Toad nope same bow different serial numbers....196's started with 9's 8's 7's 18's and 19's first digets??? along with others.... 1965 started with a 5 as the first diget.But nope they are the same bows.....bowdoc
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: Earl E. Nov...mber on May 05, 2008, 06:40:00 AM
Toad,, you ain't thinking of the 66-67 KM curved stripes are you?? ..'66 is brown,, 67 back to green.
One of these days I am going to find someone with a 64-65 that I can get along with. ":^)
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: Horney Toad on May 05, 2008, 06:51:00 PM
No, what I am sayin is the 1964 and 1965 risers are the same and the 1964 has gray glass, while the 1965 has green glass. Actually the catalog says "olive gray". The 1964 says "bark gray".
With th 1964 bark gray being pure gray while the 1965 being greenish gray.
Title: Re: Bear K Mag Year
Post by: PAPALAPIN on May 05, 2008, 08:29:00 PM
'63 Artic Grey, '66 Brown.

However, seems to me that the '65 & '66 have the same riser design while the '64 is fifferent.  Also the woods in the risers are different.

Now for something important... Any ever notice that the gal in the Tomohawk Long bow ad at the top of the page looks like Jennifer Anniston?  Dumb move Brad!  You're the Pitts!