Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Haydenj7 on June 11, 2016, 11:48:00 PM

Title: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Haydenj7 on June 11, 2016, 11:48:00 PM
I am interested in people's opinions on this. My question is.....should I have expected better?

I purchased 2 packs of Grizzlystik Monarch 2 blade 200gr broadheads. They cost $120 for a 3 pack....so about $40 each. Grizzlystik's entire marketing strategy is based around ashby research, superior penetration and the superior quality of their products.

My broadheads all have machining grooves from tip to tail, running at 90degrees to the direction of travel on both sides. Therefore totally working against penetration.

I have no doubt they will the the job in any case.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: elkken on June 11, 2016, 11:51:00 PM
Maybe you should shoot something with them before you judge them
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Haydenj7 on June 12, 2016, 12:00:00 AM
As I said I am sure they will do the job. The question is at $40 per head would you expect them to have a better finish to maximise penetration?
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: pdk25 on June 12, 2016, 12:11:00 AM
My opinion is that such a tiny groove will have basically no affect on penetration, so in that regard, I don't think you should expect more.  Then again, just because something cost more doesn't mean it will do a better job than a less expensive alternative.  Good luck with them.  I hope you plan on running them through  something big and tough .
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Captain*Kirk on June 12, 2016, 12:14:00 AM
Can you post a photo so we can see the grooves?
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: pdk25 on June 12, 2016, 01:09:00 AM
http://www.alaskabowhunting.com/Monarch-200-Single-Bevel-Broadheads-3-Pack-P375C71.aspx
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Captain*Kirk on June 12, 2016, 01:15:00 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by pdk25:
 http://www.alaskabowhunting.com/Monarch-200-Single-Bevel-Broadheads-3-Pack-P375C71.aspx  
Can't see any grooves in the link photo....
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Captain*Kirk on June 12, 2016, 01:17:00 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by Haydenj7:
As I said I am sure they will do the job. The question is at $40 per head would you expect them to have a better finish to maximise penetration?
For that price I would expect them to be polished and flawless.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Haydenj7 on June 12, 2016, 01:42:00 AM
Here is a pic. Note the grooves extend to the cutting blade also, so if you pass it through the single bevel touch up sharpener it makes a mess of the edge. I have ended up resharpening them all with a spyderco sharpener so that the cutting edge is not cerated.

 (http://i.imgur.com/DSmMH3f.jpg)
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Ray Lyon on June 12, 2016, 05:25:00 AM
That does not look like a long 3to1 blade profile  advocated by Ashby
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: katman on June 12, 2016, 07:23:00 AM
If you are not happy with the product for the price you paid then return it. At that premium price I would expect a more finished product.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: shatto54 on June 12, 2016, 07:26:00 AM
This is for Hyedenj7, please don't mistake this for being judgmental, but what is the theory behind $40 a pc broadhead when $5  a pc broadheads will kill as quickly and every bit as dead. And then modifying them,I'm baffled.I have used many, many different broadheads and have gone with what works best for the set up that was being shot.I appreciate you want the best equip to do the best job possible, I applaud that. But how much of this is advertisement hype. Are the archery companies playing us for fools??
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: damascusdave on June 12, 2016, 07:51:00 AM
Those machine marks certainly look to me like they are part of the design, very uniform...did you contact the company to ask about that?

DDave
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: damascusdave on June 12, 2016, 07:57:00 AM
On what do you base your contention that the machined grooves would work against penetration...seems to me that they reduce the effective surface friction area and might very well aid penetration...from the pictures they look like a top quality product to me, just a bit different that we might be used to

DDave
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Haydenj7 on June 12, 2016, 08:08:00 AM
i also use other broadheads that are significantly cheaper....and they work great. I just thought I would give these a try and was surprised at the grooves.

Will the grooves reduce friction? Good point....maybe they do?

With regards to modding them. I shot a couple quite a bit to see how they flew. Then thought I best touch them up prior to a hunt, when touching up I used the small tool they sell for touch ups to single bevels from grizstik and found that it didn't agree with the cerated edge. Hence my resharpening. Just to explain.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: WESTBROOK on June 12, 2016, 08:15:00 AM
This should not happen for $40/ea !!


http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h101/tradtusker/305239_10150374197094389_642889388_8429639_1696978763_n_zps9fb00d8c.jpg
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: WESTBROOK on June 12, 2016, 08:18:00 AM
ooops
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Roger Norris on June 12, 2016, 10:31:00 AM
Wow...that is an expensive broadhead.

I think those ribs are probably there on purpose, possibly strengthening the ferrule. I hear your point though, about friction. I agree with you.

It's puzzling to me though.....I have a friend who is a big advocate of those heads. He was showing me how my Ace heads wouldn't work because of a few seams in them....   :knothead:
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: pdk25 on June 12, 2016, 11:25:00 AM
I couldn't see them before.  It is hard to understand why the cutting edge isn't polished, but as far as the ferrule, I really can't see that having any meaningful effect on penetration. Really think the blade should have a polished surface like the stuff heads.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Doug_K on June 12, 2016, 12:27:00 PM
The grooves on the ferrule are leftover from the machining process, unpolished. The edge is a rough grind. Sure wouldn't pay $40 for that.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: M60gunner on June 12, 2016, 12:54:00 PM
I would have expected those heads to at least be "ready to hunt". Laser marks on the cutting edge shows me lack of attention to detail. At $40 a pop I would not mind a piece of that action.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: woodchucker on June 12, 2016, 02:44:00 PM
You could have bought a 6 pack of Zwickeys for $40..... Just Sayin'     :readit:
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: newhouse114 on June 12, 2016, 03:14:00 PM
WESTBROOK, What did those hit? If steel, then I'm ok with it, if bone, there is a serious problem. I bought a bunch of over tempered heads from them one time for dirt cheap that work great in critters but are brittle when hitting small rocks in the dirt.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: D.Sheppard on June 12, 2016, 03:31:00 PM
Sometimes ya get what ya pay for ....... not so much this time !
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Shadowhnter on June 12, 2016, 05:08:00 PM
Personally,  I would be a WHOLE lot more concerned with the vents in the blades, and lack of 3:1 working advantage that would inhibit penetration for certain according to Ashbys findings, WAY before id be concerned about machining marks.

As for them heads for the money....it would be a cold day in hades before id spend that amount on a broadhead, when so many great broadheads that conform to Ashbys descriptions are out there for SOOOO much less. These heads do not even fit his description......just sayin. I would send em back in a heart beat and get something like Abowyer's Brown bear, Grizzlys, or Tuff heads. JMO.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: WESTBROOK on June 12, 2016, 05:58:00 PM
QuoteOriginally posted by newhouse114:
WESTBROOK, What did those hit? If steel, then I'm ok with it, if bone, there is a serious problem. I bought a bunch of over tempered heads from them one time for dirt cheap that work great in critters but are brittle when hitting small rocks in the dirt.
Those were failures in Buffalo, pic is from Andy Ivy while was guiding in Australia. The only heads that haven't failed are VPA, Widowmaker & Tuffhead.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: pdk25 on June 12, 2016, 07:46:00 PM
Lots big info about the  Ashby heads and brown bears failing from a bad temper.  I would assume the monarchsbhad that link worked out, but those vents are not ideal but I think the OP knee that going in, in addition to the fact it is not a 3:1 ratio head.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Sam McMichael on June 12, 2016, 07:53:00 PM
I would never spend $40 for any broadhead, but, if I did, I would want the blade to be highly polished.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: LongStick64 on June 12, 2016, 08:05:00 PM
I would of expected a broadhead at that price to be razor sharp out of the box ready to shave hair and draw blood. That is a lot of money to not get that.For less than one broadhead I could get 3 Scary Sharp Tuskers from Braveheart Archery.
http://braveheartarchery.us/tusker_broadheads.htm
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Orion on June 12, 2016, 09:50:00 PM
The little ridges on the ferrule aren't an issue, but at that price, I would expect them to be hunt ready, i.e., shaving sharp.  Can't really tell from these pix whether they are or not.

I'm not averse to spending money for quality gear, but $40 for a broad head is exorbitant.  I've spent $20 per head.  Really not any better than heads I can buy for a quarter the price.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: Captain*Kirk on June 12, 2016, 11:48:00 PM
Build a better mousetrap...and everyone will want one whether it works or not.
I watched a You Tube video of some guy doing his utmost to destroy a Zwickey Eskimo, including point-blank at a 55gal. steel drum (in and out both sides) and 1/4" steel plate. He did succeed in turning the tip once or twice, but direct hits on a dried whitetail skull punched right through.
I think we tend to overthink the process sometimes.
Sometimes, the old mousetrap works very well.
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: BenBow on June 13, 2016, 08:18:00 AM
They got through QC and you should sen them back!!!
Title: Re: Should I have expected better?
Post by: David Mitchell on June 13, 2016, 09:26:00 AM
$40 a head!!! No way no how. I'll stay with the old mouse trap.    :biglaugh: